Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:3.1.31.1 (micrococcal nuclease)
 2,818 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Ligation-mediated polymerase chain reaction (LMPCR) provides adequate sensitivity for nucleotide-level analysis of single-copy genes. Here, we report that chromatin structure can be studied by enzyme treatment of permeabilized cells followed by LMPCR. DNase I treatment of lysolecithin-permeabilized cells was found to give very clear footprints and to show differences between active and inactive X chromosomes (Xa and Xi, respectively) at the human X-linked phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK-1) locus. Beginning 380 bp upstream and continuing 70 bp downstream of the major transcription start site of PGK-1, we analyzed both strands of this promoter and CpG island and discovered the following: (1) The transcriptionally active Xa in permeabilized cells has several upstream regions that are almost completely protected on both strands from DNase I nicking. (2) Nuclei isolated in polyamine-containing buffers lack these footprints, suggesting that data from isolated nuclei can be flawed; other buffers are less disruptive. (3) The Xa has no detectable footprints at the transcription start and HIP1 consensus sequence. (4) The heterochromatic and transcriptionally inactive Xi has no footprints but has two regions showing increased DNase I sensitivity at 10-bp intervals, suggesting that the DNA is wrapped on the surface of a particle; one nucleosome-sized particle seems to be positioned over the transcription start site and another is centered approximately 260 bp upstream. (5) Potassium permanganate and micrococcal nuclease (MNase) studies indicate no melted or otherwise unusual DNA structures in the region analyzed, and MNase, unlike restriction endonuclease MspI, does cut within the positioned particles on the Xi. Results are discussed in the context of X chromosome inactivation and the maintenance of protein and DNA methylation differences between euchromatin and facultative heterochromatin at CpG islands.
 ...
PMID:Chromatin differences between active and inactive X chromosomes revealed by genomic footprinting of permeabilized cells using DNase I and ligation-mediated PCR. 204 57

Nuclease digestion of isolated nuclei was used to test whether differential chromatin structure exists for a dosage-compensated heat shock gene in Drosophila pseudoobscura. No differences were observed in nuclease sensitivity at this locus in males and females, either under heat shock or non-heat shock conditions, using micrococcal nuclease or DNase I. Although the higher level of nuclease sensitivity characterized by the induced state was removed when nuclei were prepared in high salt (0.45 M sodium chloride), this procedure did not reveal covert differences in X-linked chromatin structure between males and females. However, a clear difference was observed in the nuclease sensitivity at low level (uninduced) and high level (heat-induced) expression of the X-linked heat shock gene, suggesting that the same gene transcribed at two steady state rates can have different chromatin structures.
 ...
PMID:Chromatin structure and transcriptional activity of an X-linked heat shock gene in drosophila pseudoobscura. 631 15

Differential chromatin structure is one of the hallmarks distinguishing active and inactive genes. For the X-linked human hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase gene (HPRT), this difference in chromatin structure is evident in the differential general DNase I sensitivity and hypersensitivity of the promoter regions on active versus inactive X chromosomes. Here we characterize the nucleosomal organization responsible for the differential chromatin structure of the active and inactive HPRT promoters. The micrococcal nuclease digestion pattern of chromatin from the active allele in permeabilized cells reveals an ordered array of translationally positioned nucleosomes in the promoter region except over a 350-bp region that is either nucleosome free or contains structurally altered nucleosomes. This 350-bp region includes the entire minimal promoter and all of the multiple transcription initiation sites of the HPRT gene. It also encompasses all of the transcription factor binding sites identified by either dimethyl sulfate or DNase I in vivo footprinting of the active allele. In contrast, analysis of the inactive HPRT promoter reveals no hypersensitivity to either DNase I or a micrococcal nuclease and no translational positioning of nucleosomes. Although nucleosomes on the inactive promoter are not translationally positioned, high-resolution DNase I cleavage analysis of permeabilized cells indicates that nucleosomes are rotationally positioned over a region of at least 210 bp on the inactive promoter, which coincides with the 350-bp nuclease-hypersensitive region on the active allele, including the entire minimal promoter. This rotational positioning of nucleosomes is not observed on the active promoter. These results suggest a model in which the silencing of the HPRT promoter during X chromosome inactivation involves remodeling a transcriptionally competent, translationally positioned nucleosomal array into a transcriptionally repressed architecture consisting of rotationally but not translationally positioned nucleosomal arrays.
 ...
PMID:Nucleosomes are translationally positioned on the active allele and rotationally positioned on the inactive allele of the HPRT promoter. 1160 4