Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: EC:3.1.31.1 (
micrococcal nuclease
)
2,818
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
We have previously used substrate phage display to identify peptide sequences that are efficiently and selectively cleaved by tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) or
urokinase-type plasminogen activator
(
u-PA
). We demonstrate that this information can be used to direct selective proteolysis to new protein targets. Sequences that were labile to selective cleavage by t-PA or
u-PA
when in the context of a peptide were introduced into the 43-52 (or Omega) loop of
staphylococcal nuclease
. Both t-PA and
u-PA
hydrolyze the engineered proteins at the inserted target sequences, and Km values for protein cleavage were reduced up to 200-fold relative to values for cleavage of analogous sequences within 15 residue peptides. Variation of loop size surrounding a target sequence affects the efficiency of t-PA approximately 5-fold more strongly than that of trypsin, suggesting that cleavage by t-PA is more dependent on target site mobility. Cleavage of proteins by t-PA and
u-PA
is sequence selective.
u-PA
is 47-fold more active than t-PA for cleavage of a sequence known to be
u-PA
selective within small peptide substrates, whereas t-PA is 230-fold more active toward a t-PA-selective sequence.
...
PMID:Directing sequence-specific proteolysis to new targets. The influence of loop size and target sequence on selective proteolysis by tissue-type plasminogen activator and urokinase-type plasminogen activator. 946 80
Understanding the regulation of physiological processes requires detailed knowledge of the recognition of substrates by enzymes. One of the most productive model systems for the study of enzyme-substrate interactions is the serine protease family; however, most studies of protease action have used small substrates that contain an activated, non-natural scissile bond. Because few kinetic or structural studies have used protein substrates, the physiologically relevant target of most proteases, it seems likely that important mechanisms of substrate recognition and processing by proteases have not yet been fully elucidated. Consistent with this hypothesis, we have observed that K(m) values for protein substrates are reduced as much as 200-15000-fold relative to those of analogous peptide substrates. Here we examine the thermodynamic consequences of interactions between proteases and their substrates using
staphylococcal nuclease
(SNase) and SNase variants as model protein substrates. We have obtained values for enthalpy, entropy, and K(d) for binding of proteins and peptides by the nonspecific protease trypsin and the highly specific protease
urokinase-type plasminogen activator
(
u-PA
). To avoid cleavage of substrates during these measurements, we used inactive variants of trypsin and
u-PA
whose catalytic serine S195 had been replaced by alanine. Differences in the K(d) values for binding of protein and peptide substrates closely approximate the large differences observed in the corresponding K(m) values. Improved binding of protein substrates is due to decreased enthalpy, and this effect is pronounced for the selective protease
u-PA
. Fundamental differences in recognition of analogous protein and peptide substrates may have influenced the evolution of protease specificity.
...
PMID:Binding of nonphysiological protein and peptide substrates to proteases: differences between urokinase-type plasminogen activator and trypsin and contributions to the evolution of regulated proteolysis. 1273 81
We show the interaction between the enhancer and the minimal promoter of
urokinase-type plasminogen activator
gene during active transcription by coupling
micrococcal nuclease
digestion of cross-linked, sonicated chromatin, and chromatin immunoprecipitation. This approach allowed the precise identification of the interacting genomic fragments, one of which is resistant to
micrococcal nuclease
cleavage. The interacting fragments form a single transcriptional control unit, as indicated by their common protein content. Furthermore, we show that the enhancer-MP interaction persists during the early stages of transcription and is lost upon alpha-amanitin treatment, indicating the requirement for active transcription. Our results support a looping model of interaction between the enhancer and the MP of the
urokinase-type plasminogen activator
gene.
...
PMID:A transcription-dependent micrococcal nuclease-resistant fragment of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator promoter interacts with the enhancer. 1733 42