Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:3.1.31.1 (micrococcal nuclease)
 2,818 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A number of inbred and congenic resistant strains of mice were immunized with staphylococcal nuclease (Nase). Antibody responses were measured in the sera of the animals by a sensitive method involving inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis of DNA, High responder strains included A/J, DBA/2, BALB/c, AKR/J, C57BR, and SJL/J. DBA/1 and C57BL/6 mice were low responders. The strain distribution of anti-Nase response potential was compatible with the relevant immune response gene(s) being linked to the murine major histocompatibility complex. Linkage of this response to H-2 was demonstrated by the findings that: (a) the congenic C3H/HeJ and C3H.SW mice were respectively high and low responders; (b) the congenic lines B10.A and B10.D2 were high responders, whereas the C57BL/10 strain was a poor responder; and (c) anti-Nase response potential of F(2) progeny from DBA/1 x SJL/J matings correlated with their H-2 type. Three B10.A recombinant lines were used to map this Ir gene within H-2. B10.A(4R) was a high responder to Nase, whereas B10.A(2R) and B10.A(5R) were both low responders. We wish to propose the name Ir-Nase for the gene(s) controlling antibody responsiveness to this immunogen. Our data indicate that Ir-Nase is located within the same chromosomal segment of the H-2 complex as is Ir-IgG.
 ...
PMID:Genetic control of the immune response to staphylococcal nuclease. I. Ir-Nase: control of the antibody response to nuclease by the Ir region of the mouse H-2 complex. 482 43

The genome structure and expression of mdr genes were examined in multidrug-resistant sublines of two different murine (DBA/2J) Friend erythroleukemia cell lines, PC4 and C7D, derived by stepwise exposure to increasing concentrations of adriamycin beginning with 5 ng/ml. The PC4 cell lines selected in higher drug concentrations (80-1280 ng/ml) demonstrated amplification of all three mdr genes with preferential amplification of mdr3. Overexpression of the mdr2 and mdr3 genes accompanied their genomic amplification; however, expression of mdr1 was not seen despite amplification. In the C7D cell lines selected with higher drug concentrations (40-160 ng/ ml), amplification and overexpression of mdr1 and mdr2 without mdr3 was observed. Increased expression of mdr1 occurred prior to gene amplification. The distribution of mdr-specific genes in micrococcal nuclease-generated chromatin fractions differing in transcriptionally active sequences and proteins was different between the parent and drug-resistant sublines. An enrichment (two- to threefold) of mdr3 genes in the H1-depleted mononucleosome fraction enriched for actively transcribed genes (e.g., globin) was detected by Southern analysis of chromatin fractions in PC4-80 cells (selected in 80 ng/ml of adriamycin and overexpressing mdr3), compared to the parental cells. mdr3 enrichment was also detected using a new PCR-based method, which examined mdr3 genes and repetitive sequences. Of note, the H1-depleted chromatin fraction from PC4-20 showed enrichment of the mdr3 gene, although mdr3 expression was not detected in the cell line. These studies showed a different pattern of gene amplification and overexpression in genetically related erythroleukemia cell lines selected for resistance to the same chemotherapeutic agent. A change in chromatin organization of mdr genes preceded overexpression and amplification of the mdr3 gene.
 ...
PMID:Differential changes in genome structure and expression of the mdr gene family in multidrug-resistant murine erythroleukemia cell lines. 926 89