Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:3.1.31.1 (micrococcal nuclease)
 2,818 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

We have investigated the differential effects of ultraviolet light(UV) and ionizing radiation (IR) on human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV) and c-jun expression in HIVcat/HeLa cells. This cell line harbors integrated copies of the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (cat) gene under control of the HIV promoter. Both UV and IR increased the binding of nuclear proteins to an oligonucleotide spanning the HIV enhancer region nuclear factor kappa B sites, but only UV increased HIVcat steady-state mRNA and CAT activity. By comparison, transcription of the cellular c-jun gene increased after both types of radiation, but UV was at least 5-fold more effective than IR despite the fact that protein binding to an activator protein 1 oligonucleotide increased similarly after both UV and IR. The lack of HIVcat transcriptional response after IR does not appear to be the result of the repressor binding to upstream promoter elements since cells stably transfected with different HIV promoter deletions showed a lack of response to IR distinguishable from that of the intact promoter. While our findings indicate no correlation between increased binding of transcription factors to upstream promoter elements and increased expression of these genes after radiation, we did observe major differences in how UV and IR affected chromatin structure. UV produced extensive global chromatin decondensation, whereas IR did not, as seen in the microscope and determined by the increased susceptibility of chromatin to micrococcal nuclease digestion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Ionizing radiation activates nuclear factor kappa B but fails to produce an increase in human immunodeficiency virus gene expression in stably transfected human cells. 749 8

Genomic footprinting, in vitro footprinting and mobility shift assays were used to investigate the molecular basis for expression of mouse alpha A-crystallin, a major structural protein of the transparent lens of vertebrates. The putative control region of the mouse alpha A-crystallin gene was footprinted by DNase I digestion in nuclear extracts, by dimethylsulfate treatment in cultured cells, and by micrococcal nuclease digestion in isolated nuclei. The resulting digestion patterns were compared between alpha TN4-1 lens cells, which express alpha A-crystallin, and L929 fibroblasts, which do not express alpha A-crystallin. Four regions of DNA were found occupied in both cell types. These included positions -111 to -97 (DE-1 region), positions -75 to -55 (alpha A-CRYBP1 region), positions -35 to -12 (TATA box and PE-1 region), and positions +23 to +43 (an AP-1 consensus sequence). The DNase I footprints of the DE-1 and alpha A-CRYBP1 regions, previously implicated as functional control elements, were substantially more pronounced using nuclear extract from the alpha TN4-1 cells than from the L929 fibroblasts, suggesting more stable protein binding with the former than with the latter. Numerous in vivo binding variations were noted between the two cell types in all four of the footprinted regions examined. Finally, two complexes (A and B) were formed specifically with nuclear extracts from the alpha TN4-1 cells and a synthetic deoxyoligonucleotide comprising the alpha A-CRYBP1 region. These data indicate that specific differences in protein-DNA interactions with putative control regions are associated with tissue-preferred expression of the mouse alpha A-crystallin gene.
 ...
PMID:Protein-DNA interactions of the mouse alpha A-crystallin control regions. Differences between expressing and non-expressing cells. 846 58