Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:3.1.3.9 (glucose-6-phosphatase)
 3,081 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The effect of chlordecone (CD) on hepatic repair, measured either as recovery of microsomal enzymatic functions or as the induction of cytosolic thymidine kinase (TK) activity, was evaluated in rats given carbon tetrachloride (CCl4). Carbon tetrachloride was administered to CD-potentiated and control animals using doses of this hepatotoxin which produce similar degrees of damage at 24 hours in both groups of animals (6 and 100 microliters CCl4 per 100 g body weight, respectively). Chlordecone had no significant effect on the time course of recovery of microsomal cytochrome P-450 content or glucose-6-phosphatase activity following CCl4 administration. Hepatic TK activity was measured 48 hours after CCl4 administration as a biochemical index of the hepatic regenerative response. Thymidine kinase activity was increased eightfold in CD-treated rats receiving 6 microliters CCl4 per 100 g body weight, whereas in controls a similar induction of TK activity was produced by 100 microliters CCl4 per 100 g body weight. Therefore, the TK response in CD-treated rats receiving CCl4 is appropriate for the amount of damage produced, suggesting that CD does not inhibit the hepatic regenerative response to CCl4-induced injury. The effect of CD on hepatic repair was also examined in rats receiving a two-thirds partial hepatectomy. Pretreatment of animals with CD had no significant effect on the increase in TK activity produced 24 hours after partial hepatectomy. These results offer no support for the idea that CD impairs hepatic repair after either partial hepatectomy or CCl4 administration.
 ...
PMID:Chlordecone does not interfere with hepatic repair after carbon tetrachloride or partial hepatectomy. 246 95

Insulin inhibits transcription of the genes encoding the glucose-6-phosphatase catalytic subunit (G6Pase), phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase, and IGF binding protein-1 through insulin response sequences (IRSs) that share the same core sequence, T(G/A)TTTT(G/T). The transcription factors FOXO1a and FOXO3a have been shown to bind these elements, but there are conflicting reports as to whether this binding correlates with the action of insulin on gene transcription. Some researchers concluded, from overexpression experiments using FOXO1a, that binding correlated with the insulin response, whereas others concluded, mainly from gel retardation competition experiments using FOXO3a, that it did not. We show here that, although these factors can differentially activate gene transcription in a context-dependent manner, these conflicting data are not explained by a difference in FOXO1a and FOXO3a binding specificity. Instead, we find that gel retardation competition and binding experiments give different results; the latter reveal a correlation between FOXO1a/3a binding and the inhibition of basal G6Pase gene transcription by insulin. In addition, these data show that the binding of FOXO1a/3a to two adjacent IRSs in the G6Pase promoter is cooperative and that promoter context alters the specific IRS base requirements for FOXO1a-stimulated fusion gene expression. Surprisingly, an analysis of insulin action mediated through the G6Pase and IGF binding protein-1 IRSs in the context of a heterologous thymidine kinase promoter reveals that signaling through the latter does not support the accepted model for insulin-stimulated FOXO nuclear exclusion.
 ...
PMID:Correlation between FOXO1a (FKHR) and FOXO3a (FKHRL1) binding and the inhibition of basal glucose-6-phosphatase catalytic subunit gene transcription by insulin. 1684 May 35