Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound   Target Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound

---

Query: EC:3.1.3.16 (calcineurin)
17,112 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The introduction of new immunosuppressive agents and protocols has improved outcomes for renal transplant recipients by decreasing the risk of rejection and by increasing the function and lifespan of the allograft. This article reviews the major changes in the combinations of therapies used: calcineurin inhibitors, target of rapamycin inhibitors, mycophenolate mofetil, non-depleting monoclonal versus depleting monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies for induction and increasing emphasis on protocols for reduction or avoidance of steroids and calcineurin inhibitors. The new agents with novel immunological targets such as anti-CD40 ligand, LEA29Y, FTY720, anti-CD20 (rituximab, Rituxan, Mabthera) and anti-CH52 (alemtuzumab, Campath), which are under development but have yet to survive the rigors of clinical trials are also discussed. In the presence of low early rejection rates, immunosuppressive therapy is setting new goals such as better graft function (glomerular filtration rates), reduction in adverse effects such as hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and drug toxicity and, above all, the prevention of late graft deterioration.
...
PMID:New developments in immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplantation. 1207 85

Type 1 diabetes mellitus affects about 1 in 300 people in North America and Europe. Epidemiological studies indicate that the incidence and thus prevalence of type 1 diabetes is rising worldwide. Intervention in autoimmune type 1a diabetes could occur at the time of diagnosis or, preferably, prior to clinical presentation during the 'prediabetic' period (e.g. prevention). Prediabetes is best recognised by the detection of islet autoantibodies in the serum. Promising intervention strategies include monoclonal antibody therapies (e.g. anti-CD3, anti-CD25, anti-CD52 or anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies), immunosuppression (e.g. calcineurin inhibitors, B7 blockade, glucocorticoids, sirolimus (rapamycin), azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil), immunomodulatory therapies (e.g. plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, cytokine administration, adoptive cellular gene therapy) and tolerisation interventions (e.g. autoantigen administration or avoidance, altered peptide ligand or peptide-based therapies). To date, islet and pancreas transplantation have essentially been reserved for patients with long-standing diabetes who have complications and are also in need of a concurrent kidney transplant. None of the therapies attempted to date has produced long-term remissions in new-onset type 1 diabetes patients and no therapies have been shown to prevent the disease. Nevertheless, with advances in our understanding of basic immunology and the cellular and molecular mechanisms of tolerance induction and maintenance, successful intervention therapies will be developed. The balance between safety and efficacy is critical. Higher rates of adverse events might be more tolerable in new-onset type 1 diabetes patients if the therapy is extremely effective at inducing a permanent remission. However, therapies must not harm the beta-cells themselves or any organ system that is a potential target of diabetes complications, such as the nervous system, retina, cardiovascular system or kidney. In the treatment of prediabetes, successful therapies should provide a level of safety similar to that of currently used vaccines and a high level of efficacy.
...
PMID:Prevention strategies for type 1 diabetes mellitus: current status and future directions. 1253 19

A decade of spectacular innovation in maintenance immunosuppression drugs has resulted in dramatic reductions in acute rejection and improvement in short and long term outcome after renal transplantation. However the new drugs continue to lack specificity, many require frequent therapeutic drug monitoring and all are associated with acute and chronic toxicities. The new biologic agents, monoclonal antibodies (chimeric, humanized, and fully human) and receptor-fusion proteins, lack immunogenicity, have long half-life and prolonged biologic effects, require intermittent administration and have minimal toxicity. The specificity and selectively of the targets of the new biologic agents render them less toxic than the oral maintenance drugs and thus could possibly replace the maintenance drugs most associated with long-term toxicity such as the corticosteroids and the calcineurin inhibitors. The recently introduced anti-interleukin 2 receptor (IL-2R) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are the prototype of future biologic agents; selective, safe, and inducing prolonged biologic effects. The IL-2R mAbs have been used with a variety of maintenance immunosuppression regimens double therapy with cyclosporine and prednisone, triple therapy with cyclosporine, azathioprine and prednisone and with newer regimens such as cyclosporine or tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and prednisone, and most recently with sirolimus, MMF and prednisone. The major thrust of the new biologics in clinical development is to block the co-stimulatory pathway. The first attempt at blockade of the CD40-CD154 with anti-CD154 mAbs was disappointing. Anti-CD 154 therapy was associated with thromboembolic events and acute rejection. Attempts at blocking the CD28-B7s (CD80-CD86) pathway are currently underway with the receptor fusion protein, LEA29Y a second generation CTL4Aig, and humanized mAbs to CD 80 and CD86. LFA1, an adhesion molecule that also participates in the co-stimulatory pathway, has also been targeted with a mAb that binds to the CD11a chain of LFA1. Efalizumab, a humanized anti-CD11a mAb, was shown in a phase I trial to be potentially effective in renal transplantation. A humanized anti-CD45 RB mAb is currently in pre-clinical studies and will likely be tested in a phase I trial of renal transplantation within 1 year. While excellent results with anti-CD45 RB mAbs have been published in experimental transplantation, the mechanism of action of anti-CD45 RB mAbs remains to be determined. Several antibodies that are currently approved for non-transplant indications are currently used in single center clinical trials in renal transplantation including Campath 1 H, a humanized anti-CD52 mAb, Rituxamab, an anti-CD20 chimeric mAb, and Infliximab an anti-TNFa chimeric mAb. In addition, several humanized mutagenized anti-CD3 mAbs, huOKT3g1, aglycosyl CD3 and HuM291 have been used in limited trials in renal transplantation but have yet to have a formal clinical development. Humanized mAbs and receptor fusion proteins offer the potential of providing renal transplant recipients with a novel algorithm for immunosuppression that relies on chronic intermittent intravenous administration of safe, non-toxic agents replacing oral drug therapy maintenance.
...
PMID:New monoclonal antibodies in renal transplantation. 1277 67

Campath-1H is a humanized, monoclonal antibody directed against CD52 determinants on the surface of human B- and T-cells and monocytes. Reports of Campath-1H use as induction in adult renal transplantation have been encouraging with low rejection rates and minimal adverse events. We report four high risk pediatric kidney transplant patients who received Campath-1H for unique indications with variable results. Children ranged in age from 20 months to 16 years. Immunosuppression regimens varied. Three of four patients experienced acute rejection, two of which were C4d positive. Serial flow cytometry was performed on all four patients. The patient who received only Campath-1H has an absolute lymphocyte count that remains less than 50% of baseline at 12-months post-transplant. In addition, in this patient CD3, CD4, CD8 and CD20 remain less than 50% of baseline. From this initial experience using Campath-1H in pediatric renal transplantation we conclude that; (1) the use of Campath-1H does not prevent recurrence of FSGS, (2) as seen in adults, lack of calcineurin inhibition when using Campath-1H may increase the risk of antibody-mediated rejection and (3) prolonged lymphocyte depletion remains even after a single dose of Campath-1H in children.
...
PMID:Campath-1H use in pediatric renal transplantation. 1588 71

Transplantation is a suitable option for patients with end-stage organ failure. Many immunosuppressive agents are available, and this may pose difficulty in choosing an appropriate combination for maintenance therapy, treating episodes of acute rejection of varying severities, and tailoring therapies for specific patients. Induction therapy strategies are accomplished either by relatively high doses of conventional immunosuppressants or by using poly- or monoclonal antibodies. These antibodies are an integral part of transplant medicine today. The rationale for antibody therapy aims at augmenting immunosuppression, ensuring that delayed introduction of calcineurin inhibitors is safe, encouraging steroid withdrawal, and facilitating treatment of patients sensitized to human leukocytic antigens in addition to its crucial role in immunologic conditioning either by tolerance induction or alternatively minimizing the immunosuppressive drugs. Different trends in induction therapy initially consisted of anti-thymocyte globulin, then anti- CD3 Orthoclone, and finally anti-CD20, 25, and 52 agents. Induction therapy is associated with beneficial short- and long-term outcomes when increased risk of adverse effects related to immune system suppression are an issue, especially from cytomegalovirus and lymphomas.
...
PMID:Induction therapy. 1598 77

Remarkable advances in understanding the mechanisms of immune recognition and allograft rejection have been made in the past few years, leading to the development of innovative immunosuppressive strategies in the field of renal transplantation. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have emerged as a new class of immunosuppressive agents, which appear to be effective (in both the treatment and the prevention of acute rejection) and well-tolerated in renal transplant recipients. The highly specific effects of these drugs make them less toxic than the oral long-term maintenance agents such as corticosteroids and the calcineurin inhibitors. Some of these mAbs have already confirmed their efficacy in preventing acute rejection in clinical phase III studies, and are now part of the well-established immunosuppressive regimens; these are the anti-CD25 mAbs (basiliximab and daclizumab). Other recently developed mAbs, like anti-CD52 (Campath-1H), anti-CD20 (rituximab), anti-LFA-1, anti-ICAM-1 and anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha (infliximab), are currently being tested, and show encouraging immunosuppressive potential. Blocking either the binding of cell-surface molecules or intracellular signal transduction, these mAbs could become an effective method to promote the holy grail of solid-organ transplantation, antigen-specific tolerance.
...
PMID:New immunosuppressive therapies in renal transplantation: monoclonal antibodies. 1629 78

Since the last years the better knowledge of immunologic mechanisms underlying autoimmune phenomena and rejection of allotransplants has been accompanied by an impressive production of new drugs: new inhibitors of purine and pyrimidine synthesis, as mycophenolate mofetil and leflunomide respectively, new inhibitors of calcineurin, such as tacrolimus, and target of rapamycine, such as sirolimus. Moreover, the tremendous advance in the methodology of producing monoclonal antibodies and the genetic engineering of proteins has led to a wide variety of biological agents, many of them have been approved as important new therapies for autoimmune diseases and against graft rejection. Monoclonal antibodies targeting IL-2 cytokine receptor have been shown to be useful in decrease the incidence of rejection. Moreover, monoclonal antibodies are available which target inflammatory cytokines, such as TNFalpha and IL-1, while other monoclonal antibodies may cause immune cell depletion, such as anti CD20 rituximab, or cause disruption of co-stimuli, like CTLA4Ig abatacept in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and anti CD11 efalizumab in the treatment of psoriasis. The new biologic agents have induced salutary clinical effects and extended the therapeutic option of patients not responding to existing treatments. The future looks brighter than ever as the recorded success fuels efforts to optimize the use of the biologic agents and extend their use in other diseases.
...
PMID:[Perspectives in clinical immunology]. 1725 38

Given the severe shortage of deceased-donor organs in Japan, the use of living-donor kidney transplantation (LKT) strategies, such as ABO-incompatible living-donor kidney transplantation, has expanded rapidly. ABO-incompatible LKT was initially performed following splenectomy and antibody removal; however, immunosuppressive protocols for ABO-incompatible LKT have changed markedly over recent years in Japan. Mycophenolate mofetil, calcineurin inhibitors and corticosteroids are now used to achieve desensitization before transplantation, and thereby suppress acute antibody-mediated rejection. In addition, many institutions now use anti-CD20 antibody (rituximab) instead of splenectomy, which seems to have markedly reduced the incidence of acute antibody-mediated rejection. ABO-incompatible LKT recipients in Japan typically undergo 2-4 sessions of plasma exchange or double-filtration plasmapheresis before transplantation to remove anti-ABO antibodies. In contrast to many Western countries, antibody removal is not routinely performed after kidney transplantation in Japan. Among 1,012 ABO-incompatible LKTs carried out at 92 Japanese institutions during the period 1989-2006, 1-year, 3-year, 5-year and 10-year patient survival rates were 95%, 93%, 91% and 87%, respectively, and the corresponding graft survival rates were 90%, 86%, 80% and 63%, respectively. These data indicate that the outcomes of ABO-incompatible LKT are comparable to those of ABO-compatible LKT. This Review summarizes Japan's experience with ABO-incompatible LKT.
...
PMID:Japan's experience with living-donor kidney transplantation across ABO barriers. 1894 30

Renal transplantation is the treatment of choice of end stage renal failure. It both improves the quality and the quantity of life compared to other techniques, such as hemodialysis. These results are partly related to the use of immunosuppressive therapy more effective and whose handling has improved over time. Advances in understanding the mechanisms of lymphocyte activation and the phenomena of rejection have in fact better defined the use of these treatments and their associations. Treatments can be broadly classified according to their characteristics (biological or chemical). Among chemical treatments, steroids are widely used, although the question of their avoidance or spearing is still a matter of debate. The cornerstone of immunosuppressive regimens remains the calcineurin inhibitors, characterized by a narrow therapeutic index and the need for therapeutic drug monitoring. Inhibitors of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) have interesting antiproliferative effects that could be important against chronic allograft dysfunction and/or carcinogenesis. However, their safety profile makes them difficult to handle. Inhibitors of purine synthesis are largely based on inhibitors of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH). Their effectiveness makes them privileged partners of other therapeutic classes. Among biological treatments, it is possible to separate the depleting and non depleting antibodies. Among the former, antithymocyte globulins are mainly active in T cells, whereas rituximab, a monoclonal anti-CD20, is active in B cells involved in the phenomena of humoral rejection. The non depleting antibodies are represented by anti-CD25, directed against the receptor for interleukin-2. In the near future it is likely that the belatacept, a costimulation blockade fusion protein will be used to allow calcineurin inhibitors sparing. Other immunosuppressive agents, acting at different levels of the immune response are being evaluated. In addition, advances in pharmacology offered hope of a better individualization of immunosuppressive therapies and better definition of therapeutic strategies used.
...
PMID:[Immunosuppressive treatments: mechanisms of action and clinical use]. 2127 49

Liver transplantation is nowadays the recognized treatment of many liver diseases and liver-based metabolic disorders in childhood. The indications are congenital cholestatic diseases, mainly biliary atresia, metabolic disorders and fulminant hepatic failure. Potential candidates have to be evaluated early in a specialized center, as the survival rate is worse if the child is transplanted with end-stage liver failure. The graft is in most cases partial, either a split liver from a deceased donor (the other part going to an adult recipient), or the left lobe or left liver from a living donor. The patient's survival rate is about 80-90% at 1 year, 70-80% at 10 years, and the graft survival rate 60-70% at 10 years. Immuno-suppression depends on a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporin or tacrolimus), and either steroids or an induction with a monoclonal antibody against IL2-receptor. Early surgical complications are a non-function of the graft (rare), arterial or portal thrombosis, biliary problems (more frequent with partial grafts), bleeding. Infections with bacteria and fungi are frequent and often severe. CMV infection is prevented, or screened and preemptively treated. EBV infection is frequent and may induce a posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease, that can develop into a lymphoma. Early stages are treated with reduction of immuno-suppression and monoclonal antibodies against CD20. Acute rejection is frequent but usually easily controlled. Chronic rejection may be due to poor compliance. Late graft loss is due to chronic rejection or long-standing biliary complications. Long-term complications are progressive graft fibrosis, renal failure due to drug toxicity (mainly calcineurin inhibitors), and cancers (skin and lymphoma).
...
PMID:Liver transplantation and liver cell transplantation. 2254 Oct 63


1 2 3 Next >>

---