Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:2.7.7.6 (RNA polymerase)
 34,946 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

We have examined the interactions of lac repressor and RNA polymerase with the DNA of the lac control region, using a method for direct visualization of the regions of DNA protected by proteins from DNAase attack. The repressor protects the operator essentially as reported by Gilbert and Maxam (1) with some small modifications. However, the evidence reported here concerning the binding of RNA polymerase to the DNA of the promoter mutant UV5 indicates that : 1) the RNA polymerase molecule binds asymmetrically to the promoter DNA, 2) RNA polymerase protects DNA sequences to within a few bases of the CAP binding site, suggesting direct interaction between polymerase and the CAP protein at this site, 3) RNA polymerase still binds to the promoter when repressor is bound to the operator, but fails to form the same extensive complex.
 ...
PMID:The interaction of RNA polymerase and lac repressor with the lac control region. 37 Jul 84

cAMP is an ubiquitous compound which is involved in the regulation of many biological processes. In bacteria such as E. coli, cAMP mediates the activation of catabolic operons via the CAP protein. The CAP-cAMP complex, whose tridimensional structure has recently been established, binds to the promoter regions of catabolic operons at a specific site, and activates their transcription by inducing RNA polymerase to bind and initiate transcription at the correct site. Various phenomenons including protein-protein interactions or CAP-induced DNA bending or kinking could be involved in the process of forming the open transcription complex. In eukaryotes, cAMP activates cAMP dependent protein kinases which covalently modify proteins by phosphorylation on serine or threonine residues. The catalytically inactive holoenzyme is generally a tetramer containing two regulatory subunits, each capable of binding two molecules of cAMP, and two catalytic subunits. In mammalian cells, two types of cAMP dependent protein kinases (I and II) can be distinguished on the basis of their regulatory subunits; their relative proportion varies from tissue to tissue. Binding of cAMP to the regulatory subunits induces the dissociation of the holoenzyme and releases the free and active catalytic subunits. Phosphorylation of proteins occurs at sequences containing two basic residues in the vicinity of the phosphorylated serine or threonine. A heat-stable protein, present in most eukaryotic cells, specifically interacts with the catalytic subunit and inhibits its activity. The amino-acid sequence of cAMP dependent protein kinases has recently been determined. It is interesting to note that the domains responsible for cAMP binding by the regulatory subunits of mammalian cAMP dependent protein kinases and CAP share important sequence homologies. The same phenomenon is observed concerning the domain responsible for ATP binding to the catalytic subunit of cAMP dependent protein kinases and that of tyrosine-specific protein kinases from oncoviruses. Other eukaryotic proteins such as S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine (SAH) hydrolase are also capable of binding cAMP. The latter is involved in the regulation of S-adenosyl-L-methionine dependent methylations, and its activity could be affected by cAMP. Besides its role as an effector of enzymatic activity via phosphorylation, such as in the regulation of glycogen metabolism, cAMP has recently been shown to activate the transcription of a number of eukaryotic genes. This process probably also involves protein phosphorylation, but its precise mechanism remains to be understood.
 ...
PMID:[Mode of action of cyclic amp in prokaryotes and eukaryotes, CAP and cAMP-dependent protein kinases]. 241 6

Characterization of ternary complexes containing an Escherichia coli lac promoter DNA fragment, CAP protein and RNA polymerase, separated on non-denaturing polyacrylamide gels and footprinted in the gel slice, reveals a striking stabilization of CAP against dissociation in the open complex, compared to the CAP-DNA complex lacking RNA polymerase. The stabilization is lost when half a helical turn of DNA is inserted between CAP and polymerase sites, but is partially restored with an 11 base-pair insert; stimulation of transcription parallels the stabilization effect. This behavior suggests a direct protein-protein interaction. Comparison of initiation kinetics for wild-type and a mutant in which the P2 promoter has been inactivated shows that CAP both strengthens binding in the closed complex and accelerates isomerization to the open complex; the latter effect accounts for the bulk of the observed transcriptional activation.
 ...
PMID:Synergy between Escherichia coli CAP protein and RNA polymerase in the lac promoter open complex. 264 87

A cyclic AMP-binding protein (CAP protein), cyclic AMP, and RNA polymerase holoenzyme are shown to initiate lac transcription at the lac promoter. Lac repressor appears to control transcription by preventing RNA polymerase and/or CAP protein from binding to the lac promoter. Results support the idea that the lac promoter is composed of two sites that interact with CAP protein and RNA polymerase holoenzyme. The promoter can be altered by mutation so that holoenzyme alone can initiate lac transcription correctly.
 ...
PMID:Mechanism of initiation and repression of in vitro transcription of the lac operon of Escherichia coli. 433 60

In Escherichia coli, subdomains 2.4 and 4.2 of the primary transcription factor sigma 70 are the most highly conserved regions and are responsible for the recognition of -10 and -35 promoter elements respectively. Mutational studies provide evidence to this end and indicate that the side chains of subdomain 4.2 make specific contacts with the nucleotides at -35. Subdomain 4.2 is highly conserved among group-1 sigma factors and is strongly homologous to the classical helix-turn-helix (HTH) motif shared by bacteriophage lembda cl, Cro, the CAP protein and other homeodomain proteins, suggesting that sigma factor also belongs to the HTH class of proteins. In this study, a single point mutation of the conserved hydrophobic residue valine at position 576, in the 4.2 subdomain results in a mutant that is transcriptionally inefficient although conformationally similar to wild-type sigma. The mutant sigma, like wild-type, migrates as a 87 kDa protein on SDS gels and has 50% helicity. However, transcription at "extended -10 promoter' by RNA polymerase containing mutant sigma 70-V576G, synthesized appreciable amount of RNA product, when compared with that generated by sigma 70-W434G, a mutation in -10 DNA binding domain. A model of HTH motif for the conserved 20 residue region of 4.2 domain of E. coli sigma 70 as well as its mutant sigma 70-V576G and sigma 70-V576T were constructed based on five other homologous HTH motifs from DNA-protein complexes for which X-ray or NMR structure is available. A B-DNA structure was designed for -35 region using sequence dependent base pair parameters. The modeled HTH structure was docked into the major groove formed by the -35 hexamer DNA using the DNA-recognition rules and amino acid-nucleotide base contact information of homologous DNA-protein complexes. Analysis of the residue contact information of the model was tested and found to have good agreement with the experimental reports.
 ...
PMID:Recognition of promoter DNA by subdomain 4.2 of Escherichia coli sigma 70: a knowledge based model of -35 hexamer interaction with 4.2 helix-turn-helix motif. 917 41