Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:2.7.7.6 (RNA polymerase)
34,946 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

MelR is a melibiose-triggered transcription activator that belongs to the AraC family of transcription factors. Using purified Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and a cloned DNA fragment carrying the entire melibiose operon intergenic region, we have demonstrated in vitro open complex formation and activation of transcription initiation at the melAB promoter. This activation is dependent on MelR and melibiose. These studies also show that the cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) interacts with the melAB promoter and increases MelR-dependent transcription activation. DNAase I footprinting has been exploited to investigate the location of MelR-and CRP-binding sites at the melAB promoter. We showed previously that MelR binds to two identical 18 bp target sequences centred at position -100.5 (Site 1) and position -62.5 (Site 2). In this work, we show that MelR additionally binds to two other related 18 bp sequences: Site 1', centred at position -120.5, located immediately upstream of Site 1, and Site R, at position -238.5, which overlaps the transcription start site of the divergent melR promoter. MelR can bind to Site 1', Site 1, Site 2 and Site R, in both the absence and the presence of melibiose. However, in the presence of melibiose, MelR also binds to a fifth site (Site 2', centred at position -42.5) located immediately downstream of Site 2, and overlapping the -35 region of the melAB promoter. Additionally, although CRP is unable to bind to the melAB promoter in the absence of MelR, in the presence of MelR, it binds to a site located between MelR binding Site 1 and Site 2. Thus, tandem-bound MelR recruits CRP to the MelR. We propose that expression from the melAB promoter has an absolute requirement for MelR binding to Site 2'. Optimal expression of the melAB promoter requires Sites 1', Site 1, Site 2 and Site 2'; CRP acts as a 'bridge' between MelR bound at Sites 1' and 1 and at Sites 2 and 2', increasing expression from the melAB promoter. In support of this model, we show that improvement of the base sequence of Site 2' removes the requirement for Site 1' and Site 1, and short circuits the effects of CRP.
...
PMID:Transcription activation at the Escherichia coli melAB promoter: the role of MelR and the cyclic AMP receptor protein. 1076 Jan 78

The nucleosome and chromatin fiber provide the common structural framework for transcriptional control in eukaryotes. The folding of DNA within these structures can both promote and impede transcription dependent on structural context. Importantly, neither the nucleosome nor the chromatin fiber is a static structure. Histone dissociation, histone modification, nucleosome mobility, and assorted allosteric transitions contribute to transcriptional control. Chromatin remodeling is associated with gene activation and repression. Energy-dependent processes mediate the assembly of both activating and repressive proteins into the nucleosomal infrastructure. Recent progress allows the structural consequences of these processes to be visualized at the chromosomal level. DNA and RNA polymerase, SWI/SNF complexes, histone deacetylases, and acetyltransferases are targeted by gene-specific regulators to mediate these structural transitions. The mistargeting of these enzymes contributes to human developmental abnormalities and tumorigenesis. These observations illuminate the roles of chromatin and chromosomal structural biology in human disease.
...
PMID:Review: chromatin structural features and targets that regulate transcription. 1080 63

The transcription activator protein NtrC (nitrogen regulatory protein C) can catalyze the transition of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase complexed with the sigma 54 factor (RNAP.sigma(54)) from the closed complex (RNAP.sigma(54) bound at the promoter) to the open complex (melting of the promoter DNA). This process involves phosphorylation of NtrC (NtrC-P), assembly of an octameric NtrC-P complex at the enhancer sequence, interaction of this complex with promoter-bound RNAP.sigma(54) via DNA looping, and hydrolysis of ATP. We have used this system to study the influence of the DNA conformation on the transcription activation rate in single-round transcription experiments with superhelical plasmids as well as linearized templates. Most of the templates had an intrinsically curved DNA sequence between the enhancer and the promoter and differed with respect to the location of the curvature and the distance between the two DNA sites. The following results were obtained: (i) a ten- to 60-fold higher activation rate was observed with the superhelical templates as compared to the linearized conformation; (ii) the presence of an intrinsically curved DNA sequence increased the activation rate of linear templates about five times; (iii) no systematic effect for the presence and/or location of the inserted curved sequence was observed for the superhelical templates. However, the transcription activation rate varied up to a factor of 10 between some of the constructs. (iv) Differences in the distance between enhancer and promoter had little effect for the superhelical templates studied. The results were compared with theoretical calculations for the dependence of the contact probability between enhancer and promoter expressed as the molar local concentration j(M). A correlation of j(M) with the transcription activation rate was observed for values of 10(-8) M<j(M)<10(-6) M and a kinetic model for NtrC-P-catalyzed open complex formation was developed.
...
PMID:The effect of the DNA conformation on the rate of NtrC activated transcription of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase.sigma(54) holoenzyme. 1089 Dec 65

Transcriptional activators are believed to work in part by recruiting general transcription factors, such as TATA-binding protein (TBP) and the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme. Activation domains also contribute to remodeling of chromatin in vivo. To determine whether these two activities represent distinct functions of activation domains, we have examined transcriptional activation and chromatin remodeling accompanying artificial recruitment of TBP in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). We measured transcription of reporter genes with defined chromatin structure by artificial recruitment of TBP and found that a reporter gene whose TATA element was relatively accessible could be activated by artificially recruited TBP, whereas two promoters, GAL10 and CHA1, that have accessible activator binding sites, but nucleosomal TATA elements, could not. A third reporter gene containing the HIS4 promoter could be activated by GAL4-TBP only when a RAP1 binding site was present, although RAP1 alone could not activate the reporter, suggesting that RAP1 was needed to open the chromatin structure to allow activation. Consistent with this interpretation, artificially recruited TBP was unable to perturb nucleosome positioning via a nucleosomal binding site, in contrast to a true activator such as GAL4, or to perturb the TATA-containing nucleosome at the CHA1 promoter. Finally, we show that activation of the GAL10 promoter by GAL4, which requires chromatin remodeling, can occur even in swi gcn5 yeast, implying that remodeling pathways independent of GCN5, the SWI-SNF complex, and TFIID can operate during transcriptional activation in vivo.
...
PMID:Artificially recruited TATA-binding protein fails to remodel chromatin and does not activate three promoters that require chromatin remodeling. 1091 68

Activating Region 1 of Escherichia coli FNR protein is proposed to interact directly with the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit (alphaCTD) during transcription activation at FNR-regulated promoters. Using an alphaCTD alanine scan mutant library, we have identified the residues of alphaCTD that are important for FNR-dependent transcription activation. Residues Asp-305, Gly-315, Arg-317, Leu-318 and Asp-319 are proposed to be the key residues in the contact site on alphaCTD for Activating Region 1 of FNR. In previous work, it had been shown that Activating Region 1 of FNR is a large surface-exposed patch and that the two crucial amino acid residues are Thr-118 and Ser-187. In this work, we have constructed Arg-118 FNR and Arg-187 FNR and shown that both FNR derivatives are defective in transcription activation. However, the activity of FNR carrying Arg-118 can be partially restored by substitutions of Lys-304 in alphaCTD. Similarly, the activity of FNR carrying Arg-187 can be partially restored by substitutions of Arg-317 or Leu-318 in alphaCTD. The specificity of the restoration suggests that, during transcription activation by FNR, the side-chain of residue 118 in Activating Region 1 of FNR is located close to Lys-304 and Asp-305 in alphaCTD. Similarly, the side-chain of residue 187 in Activating Region 1 of FNR is located close to Arg-317 and Leu-318 in alphaCTD. These results can be used to model the interface between Activating Region 1 of FNR and its contact target in alphaCTD, and permit comparison of this interface with the interface between Activating Region 1 of the related transcription activator, CRP and alphaCTD.
...
PMID:Analysis of interactions between Activating Region 1 of Escherichia coli FNR protein and the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit: use of alanine scanning and suppression genetics. 1097 22

Pseudomonas azelaica HBP1 degrades the toxic substance 2-hydroxybiphenyl (2-HBP) by means of three enzymes that are encoded by structural genes hbpC, hbpA, and hbpD. These three genes form a small noncontiguous cluster. Their expression is activated by the product of regulatory gene hbpR, which is located directly upstream of the hbpCAD genes. The HbpR protein is a transcription activator and belongs to the so-called XylR/DmpR subclass within the NtrC family of transcriptional activators. Transcriptional fusions between the different hbp intergenic regions and the luxAB genes of Vibrio harveyi in P. azelaica and in Escherichia coli revealed the existence of two HbpR-regulated promoters; one is located in front of hbpC, and the other one is located in front of hbpD. Northern analysis confirmed that the hbpC and hbpA genes are cotranscribed, whereas the hbpD gene is transcribed separately. No transcripts comprising the entire hbpCAD cluster were detected, indicating that transcription from P(hbpC) is terminated after the hbpA gene. E. coli mutant strains lacking the structural genes for the RNA polymerase sigma(54) subunit or for the integration host factor failed to express bioluminescence from P(hbpC)- and P(hbpD)-luxAB fusions when a functional hbpR gene was provided in trans. This pointed to the active role of sigma(54) and integration host factor in transcriptional activation from these promoters. Primer extension analysis revealed that both P(hbpC) and P(hbpD) contain the typical motifs at position -24 (GG) and -12 (GC) found in sigma(54)-dependent promoters. Analysis of changes in the synthesis of the hbp mRNAs, in activities of the 2-HBP pathway enzymes, and in concentrations of 2-HBP intermediates during the first 4 h after induction of continuously grown P. azelaica cells with 2-HBP demonstrated that the specific transcriptional organization of the hbp genes ensured smooth pathway expression.
...
PMID:Transcriptional organization and dynamic expression of the hbpCAD genes, which encode the first three enzymes for 2-hydroxybiphenyl degradation in Pseudomonas azelaica HBP1. 1111 26

The cAMP response element binding protein (CREB) is a bifunctional transcription activator, exerting its effects through a constitutive activation domain (CAD) and a distinct kinase inducible domain (KID), which requires phosphorylation of Ser-133 for activity. Both CAD and phospho-KID have been proposed to recruit polymerase complexes, but this has not been directly tested. Here, we show that the entire CREB activation domain or the CAD enhanced recruitment of a complex containing TFIID, TFIIB, and RNA polymerase II to a linked promoter. The nuclear extracts used mediated protein kinase A (PKA)-inducible transcription, but phosphorylation of CRG (both of the CREB activation domains fused to the Gal4 DNA binding domain) or KID-G4 did not mediate recruitment of a complex, and mutation of the PKA site in CRG abolished transcription induction by PKA but had no effect upon recruitment. The CREB-binding protein (CBP) was not detected in the recruited complex. Our results support a model for transcription activation in which the interaction between the CREB CAD and hTAFII130 of TFIID promotes the recruitment of a polymerase complex to the promoter.
...
PMID:Recruitment of an RNA polymerase II complex is mediated by the constitutive activation domain in CREB, independently of CREB phosphorylation. 1115 88

In the archaeon Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum, MTH1669 encodes a protein with a sequence related to the N-terminal sequences of the alpha-subunits of eucaryal general transcription factor TFIIE. The recombinant MTH1669 gene product has been purified and shown to stimulate transcription in vitro from M. thermoautotrophicum promoters that were almost inactive or much less active in reaction mixtures that contained only M. thermoautotrophicum RNA polymerase, TATA-binding protein and transcription factor B. As all complete archaeal genome sequences contain an MTH1669 homolog, the protein encoded by this gene is apparently the first characterized example of a transcription activator, here designated TFE, that may be universally present in the Archaea.
...
PMID:TFE, an archaeal transcription factor in Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum related to eucaryal transcription factor TFIIEalpha. 1116 Jan 19

Oocytes from Xenopus laevis have provided a model system for studying the dynamic changes that occur in chromatin during gene activation. We have reconstituted glucocorticoid receptor (GR) induced transcription from the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter by intranuclear injection of an MMTV-driven reporter and cytoplasmic injection of synthetic mRNA(GR) into Xenopus oocytes. Here we investigate the intranuclear distribution of injected DNA, which is assembled into chromatin. We show that this chromatin is organized as an intranuclear fibrous network. Unliganded GR is located in the cytosol and hormone triggers its nuclear translocation and association with the chromatin fibers. Furthermore, we analyze the intranuclear distribution of other factors involved in transcription from the MMTV promoter. Indirect immunofluorescence microscopy on cryostat-sectioned oocytes revealed that BRG1, which is a subunit of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex, as well as RNA polymerase II and recombinantly expressed Xenopus nuclear factor 1-B, are all associated with the endogenous chromosomes and the chromatin fibers formed on injected DNA. This association does not depend on specific DNA binding sites and appears to be nonspecific.
...
PMID:Glucocorticoid hormone-induced receptor localization to the chromatin fibers formed on injected DNA in Xenopus oocytes. 1130 98

Single Rap1p DNA-binding sites are poor activators of transcription of yeast minimal promoters, even when fully occupied in vivo. This low efficiency is due to two independent repression mechanisms as follows: one that requires the presence of histones, and one that requires Hrs1p, a component of the RNA polymerase II mediator complex. Both repression mechanisms were greatly reduced for constructs with tandemly arranged sites. In these constructs, UASrpg sequences (ACACCCATACATTT) activated better than telomere-like sequences (ACACCCACACACCC) in an orientation-dependent manner. Both mutations in the SWI/SNF complex and a deletion of amino acids 597--629 of Rap1p (Tox domain) decreased synergistic effects of contiguous telomeric sites. Conversely, deletion of amino acids 700--798 of Rap1p (Sil domain) made UASrpg and telomeric sites functionally indistinguishable. We propose that the Sil domain masks the main transactivation domain of Rap1p in Rap1p-telomere complexes, where the Tox domain behaves as a secondary activation domain, probably by interacting with chromatin-remodeling complexes. Rap1p DNA-binding sites in ribosomal protein gene promoters are mainly UASrpg-like; their replacement by telomeric sequences in one of these promoters (RPS17B) decreased transcription by two-thirds. The functional differences between UASrpgs and telomeric sequences may thus contribute to the differential expression of Rap1p-regulated promoters in vivo.
...
PMID:Alternative mechanisms of transcriptional activation by Rap1p. 1135 63


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>