Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound   Target Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound

---

Query: EC:2.7.7.49 (reverse transcriptase)
31,746 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The clinical significance of the reduced in vitro susceptibility of HIV to antiretroviral agents has been difficult to elucidate for nucleoside analogs such as zidovudine. However, the virological significance of resistance to nevirapine and other HIV-1-specific reverse transcriptase inhibitors has been established. With antiretroviral therapy, disease progression is not equivalent to drug failure, which is not equivalent to drug resistance. Clinical disease progression is only indirectly linked to HIV replication. Drug resistance is complex, and combining drugs does not appear to delay emergence of resistant strains of HIV although it may affect the specific amino acid substitutions. Drug resistance does appear to contribute to drug failure. The clinical trial ACTG 116B/117 found that the duration of prior zidovudine therapy was not related to the relative benefit of switching to didanosine. Preliminary results of analysis of resistant strains of HIV isolated from ACTG 116B/117 patients revealed that the relative hazard of progression was about threefold higher for patients with high-level resistance to zidovudine, syncytium-inducing biological phenotype, and an AIDS diagnosis at baseline. This study showed clearly that acquisition of an HIV strain with high-level resistance to zidovudine was a poor prognostic factor. Although nevirapine resistance emerges rapidly, preliminary data suggest that high dosages may be active against HIV even in the presence of resistant HIV strains. At the present time, viral resistance and biological phenotype are not useful in the management of individual patients.
...
PMID:Resistance, drug failure, and disease progression. 781 40

Saquinavir is a peptide derivative which inhibits the HIV protease enzyme, preventing post-translational processing of viral polyproteins. It was the first agent of its class to become available for the treatment of HIV infection. Well controlled studies have assessed the effects of saquinavir, when used alone or in combination with reverse transcriptase inhibitors, in patients with advanced HIV infection. Analysis of CD4+ cell counts and measures of viral load in the ACTG 229 study suggest that triple therapy with saquinavir, zidovudine and zalcitabine is more effective than double therapy with saquinavir plus zidovudine or zidovudine plus zalcitabine in patients who have previously received long term treatment with zidovudine. Similar assessments from a small study in previously untreated patients suggest that double therapy with saquinavir plus zidovudine is more effective than monotherapy with either agent. Combination therapy with saquinavir and zalcitabine significantly reduced the time to the first AIDS-defining event or death, and the time to death, compared with zalcitabine alone, according to data from a large, long term study (NV 14256) in patients with advanced HIV infection who had previously received zidovudine. Saquinavir is generally well tolerated, either as monotherapy or in combination with reverse transcriptase inhibitors; no change in tolerability profile was reported when saquinavir was added to treatment with nucleoside analogues. In vitro and clinical studies have documented the emergence of saquinavir-resistant HIV strains. Although the possible impact of resistance on the clinical efficacy of saquinavir has yet to be fully characterised, genotypic and phenotypic resistance appear to develop slowly during treatment with saquinavir, and the drug does not appear to have a significant effect on the incidence of mutations associated with cross-resistance to other protease inhibitors. Thus, laboratory and clinical results suggest that saquinavir in combination with reverse transcriptase inhibitors is effective in the treatment of advanced HIV infection. Initial data on the effects of saquinavir on disease progression and mortality are promising, and the apparent absence of mutations conferring cross-resistance to other protease inhibitors is a potentially valuable clinical feature. Additional data on disease progression, mortality and viral resistance, together with information on relative efficacy (in comparison with other protease inhibitors), will need to be assessed before the clinical value of saquinavir can be fully determined. Nevertheless, saquinavir represents a valuable new pharmacological option for the treatment of HIV infection and is likely to be a useful component of combined therapy with reverse transcriptase inhibitors and/or other protease inhibitors.
...
PMID:Saquinavir. A review of its pharmacology and clinical potential in the management of HIV infection. 879 87

The safety, tolerability, and antiviral activity of atevirdine (ATV), a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, were studied in a phase I/II clinical trial (ACTG 187) of patients with CD4 counts < or =500/mm3. In all, 34 HIV-1-infected patients were randomized to receive ATV for 12 weeks in doses chosen to achieve one of three serum trough levels: 5 to 13 microM, 14 to 22 microM, or 23 to 31 microM. Rash was the most common adverse event, with a grade 3 or 4 rash occurring in 4 patients. No significant change from baseline in HIV-1 plasma RNA mean copy number was detected at week 4 (+0.09 log10 copies/ml; p = .30). However, some evidence indicated moderate antiviral activity at week 4, based on median changes in CD4 count (+23/mm3; p = .05), and viral peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) titer (-0.68 log10) copies/ml; p = .03). In addition, 2 of 4 patients with detectable baseline serum p24 antigen showed declines of >50%. HIV-1 resistance to ATV was detected in 41% of patients and was most commonly associated with RT mutations K103N and Y181C. In contrast, the Y181C mutation was not detected in ATV-resistant isolates obtained from patients enrolled in ACTG 199, a study of ATV given in combination with zidovudine. Under the conditions of this study, ATV failed to demonstrate significant antiretroviral activity. However, transient in vivo activity might have been obscured by rapid development of resistance coupled with inadequate sampling at early time points following initiation of ATV therapy.
...
PMID:Phase I study of atevirdine mesylate (U-87201E) monotherapy in HIV-1-infected patients. 976 22

Thirteen laboratories evaluated the reproducibility of sequencing methods to detect drug resistance mutations in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT). Blinded, cultured peripheral blood mononuclear cell pellets were distributed to each laboratory. Each laboratory used its preferred method for sequencing proviral DNA. Differences in protocols included: DNA purification; number of PCR amplifications; PCR product purification; sequence/location of PCR/sequencing primers; sequencing template; sequencing reaction label; sequencing polymerase; and use of manual versus automated methods to resolve sequencing reaction products. Five unknowns were evaluated. Thirteen laboratories submitted 39043 nucleotide assignments spanning codons 10-256 of HIV-1 RT. A consensus nucleotide assignment (defined as agreement among > or = 75% of laboratories) could be made in over 99% of nucleotide positions, and was more frequent in the three laboratory isolates. The overall rate of discrepant nucleotide assignments was 0.29%. A consensus nucleotide assignment could not be made at RT codon 41 in the clinical isolate tested. Clonal analysis revealed that this was due to the presence of a mixture of wild-type and mutant genotypes. These observations suggest that sequencing methodologies currently in use in ACTG laboratories to sequence HIV-1 RT yield highly concordant results for laboratory strains; however, more discrepancies among laboratories may occur when clinical isolates are tested.
...
PMID:Interlaboratory concordance of DNA sequence analysis to detect reverse transcriptase mutations in HIV-1 proviral DNA. ACTG Sequencing Working Group. AIDS Clinical Trials Group. 982 May 78

Many amino acid (aa) sites in reverse transcriptase (RT) have been implicated in resistance to nucleoside (NRTI) and nonnucleoside antiretrovirals. Interactions between these in response to combination therapy remain poorly understood. In a trial (ACTG 241) of zidovudine/didanosine (ddI) versus zidovudine/ddI/nevirapine in nucleoside-experienced patients, baseline sequence data from the RT coding region was analyzed from 55 individuals. Sequences were clustered by use of a parsimony method and the virological responses (ratio of baseline viral load to viral load after of therapy) for each cluster were analyzed at week 8 and week 48. Both clusters and genotype at aa 215 were significantly associated with virological response at both time points, whereas viral load showed a stronger association with sequence clusters. Sequence clusters identified one group of patients who never developed high-level resistance to NRTIs despite prior nucleoside exposure and poor suppression of viral replication.
...
PMID:Sequence clusters in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase are associated with subsequent virological response to antiretroviral therapy. 1047 29

Efavirenz (SUSTIVA, DMP 266, EFV) is a novel non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, which shows good inhibitory activity against HIV-1. The pharmacokinetics of efavirenz allow for once daily dosing without regard to meals of normal composition. Efavirenz is a mild inducer of CYP 3A4. Clinically significant drug interactions have been reported with medications that are metabolised via the cytochrome P450 enzymes such as indinavir and saquinavir. Results from the studies collated for submission (003, 006, 020, 024 and ACTG 364) have demonstrated the potency and durability of once daily efavirenz in combination with zidovudine (AZT) + lamivudine (3TC), indinavir (IDV), nelfinavir (NFV), IDV + 2 NRTIs, and NFV + 2 NRTIs. Efavirenz was recently approved for commercial use in the USA and has received marketing authorisation in Europe and Canada.
...
PMID:Clinical history of efavirenz. 1062 35

Indinavir is a protease inhibitor used in the treatment of patients with HIV infection. Combination antiretroviral therapy with indinavir plus 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) is associated with greater reductions in viral load, greater increases in CD4+ cell counts, and reduced morbidity and mortality when compared with 2 NRTIs alone. In the landmark clinical trial ACTG 320, the rate of progression to AIDS or death (primary end-point) among zidovudine-experienced patients treated with indinavir, zidovudine and lamivudine was approximately half that of patients who received only zidovudine plus lamivudine (6 vs 11%; p < 0.001). The durability of an indinavir-containing regimen was demonstrated in Merck protocol 035, an ongoing trial in which a significant proportion of patients had sustained viral suppression for up to 3 years. Merck protocol 039, also an ongoing trial, showed a greater effect on surrogate markers of HIV disease progression with indinavir-based triple therapy than with zidovudine plus lamivudine or indinavir monotherapy in patients with advanced disease (median baseline CD4+ count 15 cells/microL). Numerous additional clinical trials have established the beneficial antiviral and immunological effects of indinavir in both antiretroviral-naive and -experienced patients with HIV infection. Indinavir is associated with various drug class-related adverse events, including gastrointestinal disturbances (e.g. nausea, diarrhoea), headache and asthenia/fatigue. A lipodystrophy syndrome has been commonly reported with indinavir and other protease inhibitors combined with NRTIs, but it has also been reported in many protease inhibitor-naive patients, and a definitive causal link has not been established between the syndrome and protease inhibitors. Nephrolithiasis may develop in about 9% of patients receiving indinavir but does not appear to be associated with other protease inhibitors; <0.5% of patients receiving indinavir discontinue the drug because of nephrolithiasis, which may be the extreme end of a continuum of crystal-related renal syndromes. Additional renal problems (e.g. nephropathy) have been reported in small numbers of patients receiving indinavir. In summary, indinavir is a protease inhibitor with well documented efficacy when used as part of combined therapy in patients with HIV infection. Both US and UK treatment guidelines continue to recommend protease inhibitor-based regimens including indinavir as a first-line option. Indinavir is being studied as a twice daily and once daily regimen with a low dosage of ritonavir as a way to alleviate tolerability, drug interaction and patient compliance/adherence issues. Indinavir-containing triple therapy has demonstrated positive effects not only on surrogate markers of disease progression, but also on clinical end-points of mortality and morbidity in patients with HIV disease. Protease inhibitors are a significant advance in the care of patients with HIV infection, and, in an era of evidence-based medicine, indinavir represents an important component of antiretroviral treatment strategies.
...
PMID:Indinavir: a review of its use in the management of HIV infection. 1065 94

ACTG (AIDS Clinical Trials Group) 384 is designed to evaluate different strategies for antiretroviral treatment in HIV-1-infected individuals with no previous exposure to antiretroviral treatment. The study is a randomized, partially double-blinded, controlled trial with 980 subjects at 81 centers in the United States and Italy. The study has a factorial design that addresses the following scientific questions: (1) Does the best initial choice of therapy include both a protease inhibitor (PI) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) in a four-drug combination with nucleoside analogue (NRTI) drugs, or should these agents be used sequentially in three-drug combinations?; (2) Which sequence is best in a three-drug regimen-PI followed by NNRTI or NNRTI followed by PI ?; (3) Which is the best sequence of dual NRTI combinations-zidovudine plus lamivudine followed by didanosine plus stavudine, or the converse? Subjects in the three-drug combination arms are offered a salvage regimen after failure of their second regimen; subjects in the four-drug combination arm are offered a salvage regimen after failure of their first regimen. The primary endpoint of the study is the time until salvage; secondary endpoints include time to virological failure and time to toxicity-related discontinuation of therapy. A Division of AIDS Data and Safety Monitoring Board will review the trial for safety and efficacy. Control Clin Trials 2001;22:142-159
...
PMID:ACTG (AIDS Clinical Trials Group) 384: a strategy trial comparing consecutive treatments for HIV-1. 1130 52

Results of ACTG 175 and Delta, large multicenter studies comparing combinations of nucleoside antiretroviral drugs with monotherapy, are reported. ACTG 175 enrolled 2,500 HIV-infected patients (1,000 subjects were AZT naive) over a 3-year period and randomized them to one of four drug regimens: AZT plus ddC, AZT plus ddI, AZT alone, or ddI alone. In moderately immunocompromised patients, the best results are obtained with either combination, or with ddI alone. In patients already on AZT, it is better to add or switch to ddI than to continue AZT monotherapy. The Delta trial enrolled 3,300 subjects and studied the same combinations as in ACTG 175 and AZT monotherapy, but did not study ddI monotherapy. Patients receiving combination therapy did better than those receiving AZT alone. AZT-experienced patients, regardless of the treatment received, experienced similar rates of progression to AIDS or death. This study was ceased prematurely due to the high rate of deaths in AZT-naive subjects receiving AZT alone compared to combination therapies. Other drug combination studies, such as AZT combined with 3TC, show superiority to AZT monotherapy in decreasing viral load and increasing CD4 counts, but do not correlate the results with clinical benefit. Other issues discussed include development and use of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, studies involving HIV protease inhibitors, and the development of resistance and cross-resistance to various classes of antiviral agents.
...
PMID:Antiretroviral combination treatment prolongs life in people with HIV/AIDS. 1136 17

At the 36th International Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC), updates on research on non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, protease inhibitors, and newer treatments were presented. Among the research topics reviewed are results from the CAESAR study, guidelines for use of antiretrovirals, and the efficacy of new antiretroviral combinations. Also included are data tables showing the impact of viral load and CD4 count on risk of progression among 2,008 persons in trials of delavirdine; the detection of HIV RNA after 40 to 52 weeks in a trial of nevirapine/ZDV/ddI; viral load and CD4 changes in a phase I/II study of 141W94; viral load changes, principal side effects, and dropouts in a trial of ritonavir plus saquinavir; clinical endpoint results of the CAESAR trial; viral load and CD4 changes after 50 weeks of IL-2 plus indinavir; comparison of regimens for treating CMV retinitis; prevalence of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus antigen in HIV-positive and -negative groups; and rates of MAC bacteremia in ACTG 196/CPCRA 009, a trial comparing clarithromycin, rifabutin, and the combination for prophylaxis.
...
PMID:Piloting the meanders of AIDS research. 1136 56


1 2 Next >>

---