Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound   Target Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound

---

Query: EC:2.7.7.49 (reverse transcriptase)
31,746 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

One of the hallmarks of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection is the decline in CD4+ T lymphocytes which precedes the progression from an asymptomatic state to AIDS. Apoptosis (programmed cell death) is one of the mechanisms proposed to mediate this depletion. Infectious and inactivated preparations of HIV-1LAI were compared for their potential to induce apoptosis. Analysis with fluorescence-activated cell sorting using the DNA intercalative compound propidium iodide demonstrated that apoptosis occurred only with infectious HIV-1, implying that cell surface binding and signalling by the virus alone were insufficient to trigger apoptosis. Apoptosis was further confirmed by the presence of characteristic digestion of host cell DNA and morphologically by nuclear condensation observed by transmission electron microscopy. HIV infection of CD4+ T cell lines generated an accumulation of the cells in G2/M phase of the cell cycle and cells undergoing apoptosis appeared to originate from the pool of cells in the G1 phase. Inhibitors of HIV replication were used to identify the point in the virus replicative cycle at which apoptosis is induced. The reverse transcriptase inhibitor, ddI, or the HIV protease inhibitor, RO31-8959 (Saquinavir), were added either 2 h before or 6 h after HIV inoculation. Only ddI inhibited HIV-induced apoptosis when added before inoculation; however, neither treatment was effective in preventing HIV-induced apoptosis when applied 6 h after inoculation. These data indicate that apoptosis requires a single round of reverse transcription and the expression of virion proteins, but not the maturation of progeny virions. Two agents which compete with HIV for binding to CD4+ T cells, dextran sulphate and the anti-CD4 MAb Leu3a, were effective at preventing apoptosis when added 6 h after infection, implying that a subsequent gp120-CD4 interaction at the surface of an infected cell was required to complete the apoptotic process.
...
PMID:Productive infection and subsequent interaction of CD4-gp120 at the cellular membrane is required for HIV-induced apoptosis of CD4+ T cells. 789 56

Monotherapy with (-)2',3'-dideoxy-3'-thiacytidine (3TC) leads to the appearance of a drug-resistant variant of human immunodeficiency virus-type 1 (HIV-1) with the methionine-184 --> valine (M184V) substitution in the reverse transcriptase (RT). Despite resulting drug resistance, treatment for more than 48 weeks is associated with a lower plasma viral burden than that at baseline. Studies to investigate this apparent contradiction revealed the following. (i) Titers of HIV-neutralizing antibodies remained stable in 3TC-treated individuals in contrast to rapid declines in those treated with azidothymidine (AZT). (ii) Unlike wild-type HIV, growth of M184V HIV in cell culture in the presence of d4T, AZT, Nevirapine, Delavirdine, or Saquinavir did not select for variants displaying drug resistance. (iii) There was an increase in fidelity of nucleotide insertion by the M184V mutant compared with wild-type enzyme.
...
PMID:Enhanced fidelity of 3TC-selected mutant HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. 899 51

Saquinavir is a peptide derivative which inhibits the HIV protease enzyme, preventing post-translational processing of viral polyproteins. It was the first agent of its class to become available for the treatment of HIV infection. Well controlled studies have assessed the effects of saquinavir, when used alone or in combination with reverse transcriptase inhibitors, in patients with advanced HIV infection. Analysis of CD4+ cell counts and measures of viral load in the ACTG 229 study suggest that triple therapy with saquinavir, zidovudine and zalcitabine is more effective than double therapy with saquinavir plus zidovudine or zidovudine plus zalcitabine in patients who have previously received long term treatment with zidovudine. Similar assessments from a small study in previously untreated patients suggest that double therapy with saquinavir plus zidovudine is more effective than monotherapy with either agent. Combination therapy with saquinavir and zalcitabine significantly reduced the time to the first AIDS-defining event or death, and the time to death, compared with zalcitabine alone, according to data from a large, long term study (NV 14256) in patients with advanced HIV infection who had previously received zidovudine. Saquinavir is generally well tolerated, either as monotherapy or in combination with reverse transcriptase inhibitors; no change in tolerability profile was reported when saquinavir was added to treatment with nucleoside analogues. In vitro and clinical studies have documented the emergence of saquinavir-resistant HIV strains. Although the possible impact of resistance on the clinical efficacy of saquinavir has yet to be fully characterised, genotypic and phenotypic resistance appear to develop slowly during treatment with saquinavir, and the drug does not appear to have a significant effect on the incidence of mutations associated with cross-resistance to other protease inhibitors. Thus, laboratory and clinical results suggest that saquinavir in combination with reverse transcriptase inhibitors is effective in the treatment of advanced HIV infection. Initial data on the effects of saquinavir on disease progression and mortality are promising, and the apparent absence of mutations conferring cross-resistance to other protease inhibitors is a potentially valuable clinical feature. Additional data on disease progression, mortality and viral resistance, together with information on relative efficacy (in comparison with other protease inhibitors), will need to be assessed before the clinical value of saquinavir can be fully determined. Nevertheless, saquinavir represents a valuable new pharmacological option for the treatment of HIV infection and is likely to be a useful component of combined therapy with reverse transcriptase inhibitors and/or other protease inhibitors.
...
PMID:Saquinavir. A review of its pharmacology and clinical potential in the management of HIV infection. 879 87

The enormous resources spent on developing inhibitors of the HIV proteinase is finally proving worth while. The FDA in the USA approved saquinavir (Invirase, Roche) for treatment of AIDS in December 1995, and the presumably even more useful inhibitors, ritonavir (Norvir, Abbott) and indinavir (Crixivan, Merck) in March 1996. The clinical trials indicate that these substances are more efficient antiviral agents than the well known reverse transcriptase inhibitors (e.g., AZT or ddC). In the present article, the function of the HIV proteinase will be discussed, as well as the drug design strategies leading to the success. We believe that the combination of biotechnology and computer modelling is a potent tool for designing drugs, and that these proteinase inhibitors not only signal optimism in the treatment of AIDS, but also a new era in the development of therapeutics.
...
PMID:[The HIV proteinase--a target for antiviral agents]. 897 9

HIV-infected individuals, who received 3TC monotherapy over one year, generally had lower plasma viral burden than at base-line. This was in spite of high-level resistance to this compound and the appearance of the M184V substitution in the HIV reverse transcriptase (RT) gene, responsible for diminished sensitivity to 3TC. This apparent contradiction is explained by an increase in the fidelity of the HIV RT, conferred by the M184V mutation, on the basis of the following observations. First, titers of viral neutralizing antibodies, as measured against sequential autologous HIV isolates, remained stable in this population in contrast to rapid declines in patients treated with other drugs. This suggests that increased fidelity of M184V RT may limit variability in the HIV env gene and result in protracted effectiveness of anti-viral immune responsiveness. Second, recombinant HIV, that contained the M184V substitution in RT, could not replicate in the presence of d4T, AZT, Nevirapine, Delavirdine or Saquinavir, using previously described protocols for the generation of drug resistance in vitro.
...
PMID:Increased fidelity of drug-selected M184V mutated HIV-1 reverse transcriptase as the basis for the effectiveness of 3TC in HIV clinical trials. 920 7

To combat infection and inhibit viral replication of HIV in the brain, antiretroviral agents must cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB). An in vitro BBB model consisting of bovine brain microvessel endothelial cells grown on porous filters was used to study and compare the transport of nevirapine, a potent and selective nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, with other HIV antiretroviral agents currently in use for the treatment of HIV infection. These included nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (didanosine, stavudine, zalcitabine, zidovudine), a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase (delaviridine), and protease inhibitors (indinavir, saquinavir, VX-478). Nevirapine was the most permeable antiretroviral agent studied in the BBB model. The order of in vitro BBB permeability was nevirapine >> VX-478 > didanosine, stavudine, zalcitabine, zidovudine > indinavir > saquinavir. There was an apparent bell-shaped relationship between in vitro BBB permeability and octanol/phosphate-buffered saline distribution coefficient (D) where all lipophilic (log D > 2.5) as well as hydrophilic (log D < -0.5) antiretrovirals were less permeable than nevirapine (log D = 1.8). There were no significant effects on the in vitro BBB permeability of nevirapine in combination with other antiretroviral agents. Saquinavir was the only drug shown to have an affinity for the P-glycoprotein efflux pump, which may have contributed to its very low permeability. The apparent ability of nevirapine to readily permeate the BBB and enter the brain, where it may inhibit replication of HIV, potentially increases its therapeutic value.
...
PMID:In vitro blood-brain barrier permeability of nevirapine compared to other HIV antiretroviral agents. 952 83

Saquinavir is an HIV protease inhibitor which, formulated as a hard-gel capsule (HGC), was the first drug of its class to become available for the treatment of patients with HIV infection. Despite the beneficial effects that saquinavir HGC-containing combination regimens have shown in the treatment of patients with HIV infection, the HGC formulation has limited oral bioavailability and has shown only modest antiviral activity in vivo. To overcome this limitation (with the aim of improving antiviral efficacy), a soft-gel capsule (SGC) formulation of the drug has been developed. At the recommended dosage of 1200 mg 3 times daily, the SGC formulation of saquinavir achieves plasma concentrations > 8 times higher than those in patients receiving saquinavir HGC 600 mg 3 times daily. Initial results of trials evaluating the therapeutic efficacy of saquinavir SGC-containing combination therapy in patients with moderate to advanced HIV infection are promising. In patients who were previously antiretroviral therapy-naive or -experienced, short term (< or = 36 weeks) treatment with saquinavir SGC in combination with > or = 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), or nelfinavir, or 2 NRTIs plus nelfinavir led to marked improvements in virological and immunological markers of HIV disease. In comparative trials, saquinavir SGC showed improved antiviral activity compared with the HGC formulation in terms of reducing viral load. Furthermore, saquinavir SGC in combination with 2 NRTIs was as effective as indinavir plus 2 NRTIs in antiretroviral-naive or -experienced patients. Available data suggest that saquinavir SGC-containing combination therapy may be of greatest benefit in patients naive to previous antiretroviral therapy. The SGC formulation of saquinavir appears to be generally well tolerated by adults with HIV infection. Gastrointestinal adverse events, notably diarrhoea, abdominal discomfort, nausea and dyspepsia, are the most common adverse events occurring during treatment with the drug. Initial results of several trials that used surrogate markers to assess treatment efficacy indicate that the SGC formulation of saquinavir, administered in combination with other antiretroviral drugs, is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with moderate or advanced HIV infection. Although further data are required before definitive conclusions can be drawn regarding the comparative efficacy and tolerability of the SGC and HGC formulations, it appears likely that the SGC formulation will replace the conventional formulation as a component of combination regimens for the treatment of patients with HIV infection.
...
PMID:Saquinavir soft-gel capsule formulation. A review of its use in patients with HIV infection. 953 May 49

Saquinavir is an HIV protease inhibitor with no, or limited, effect on the activity of other structurally related human aspartic proteinases. As with other HIV protease inhibitors, saquinavir inhibits the cleavage of the gag-pol protein substrate leading to the release of structurally defective and functionally inactive viral particles. It is active on both HIV-1 and HIV-2, and also has activity on chronically infected cells and HIV strains resistant to reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Synergy of action has been observed with other antiretroviral drugs. Saquinavir is characterised by a low bioavailability which is further reduced in the fasting state. Metabolism is mainly hepatic through cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, but intestinal metabolism through the same system has also been reported. To achieve higher drug plasma concentrations and increase the antiviral effect, a new formulation of saquinavir with a higher bioavailability has recently been introduced. Higher plasma drug concentrations may also be obtained by combining the drug with CYP blockers, such as ritonavir or ketoconazole. Because of its metabolic interference with the CYP system, saquinavir cannot be coadministered with astemizole, terfenadine or cisapride. Rifampicin (rifampin) is also contraindicated because coadministration can lead to decreases in saquinavir concentrations. Interactions have also been reported with other drugs metabolised through the same system, including non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and HIV protease inhibitors. Resistance has been observed after both in vitro and in vivo drug exposure, with a relatively specific mutation profile compared with other protease inhibitors. Saquinavir is generally well tolerated, with mild gastrointestinal symptoms representing the most commonly observed adverse effects. Although characterized by low bioavailability, in phase III trials saquinavir has been shown to have clinical efficacy in terms of survival and progression rate. As with the other protease inhibitors, saquinavir should be used in combination with other antiretroviral drugs. Current therapeutic guidelines, however, recommend the selection of an initial treatment regimen with other protease inhibitors with higher in vivo activity in terms of RNA and CD4 response. The results of ongoing studies will clarify to what extent a new saquinavir formulation, recently introduced, is superior to the previous one in terms of antiviral activity and to provide comparisons with other protease inhibitors. Further studies are also needed to define the best place of saquinavir within treatment strategies based on protease inhibitors, particularly in respect to the optimal sequence for its use with other protease inhibitors, and the dynamics of cross-resistance and its role within regimens based on the combination of protease inhibitors.
...
PMID:Saquinavir. Clinical pharmacology and efficacy. 953 81

Therapeutic options are limited for patients refractory to triple therapy with two reverse transcriptase inhibitors and one protease inhibitor. Preliminary results showing favorable effects of protease inhibitor combination therapy with nelfinavir and saquinavir due to inhibition of metabolism by cytochrome P450 (CYP450) prompted us to study this combination. - Thirteen patients with incomplete suppression of plasma HIV-RNA were enrolled and treatment was started with nelfinavir 750 mg tid and saquinavir 400 mg bid. Saquinavir-dosage was escalated in weekly intervals to 400 mg tid and 600 mg tid, respectively. All doses were given with food, and plasma levels of saquinavir and nelfinavir were assessed 4 hours post-dosing after 1, 2, 3, 4 and 8 weeks. Treatment was considered virologically efficacious if HIV-viral load was reduced by at least 0.5 log10 from baseline. - Double protease inhibitor-treatment with nelfinavir and saquinavir was virologically efficacious in 5/13 (39%) patients after 4 weeks but only in 4/13 (31%) patients after 8 and 1/13 (8%) after 16 and 24 weeks, respectively. No statistical difference in plasma concentrations was observed when saquinavir was administered in increasing doses of 400 mg bid, 400 mg tid or 600 mg tid in combination with nelfinavir. 5/13 (39%) patients developed diarrhea (>4/d), no other serious side-effects were observed. By eight weeks, the mean CD4 count for all patients was significantly higher when compared to baseline. - In patients refractory to standard triple therapy the combination of nelfinavir and saquinavir showed significant elevation of CD4-count, but only short term virological efficacy in a minority of patients. Plasma concentrations of saquinavir could not be increased by weekly dose escalation of the drug from 400 mg bid to 600 mg tid. Saquinavir drug concentrations of 600 mg saquinavir tid and nelfinavir showed rather non-significant lower values when compared to historical controls treated with a double-dose 1200 mg saquinavir tid regimen alone. We conclude that in these patients the combination of nelfinavir plus saquinavir has no advantage in terms of increasing bioavailibility of saquinavir or virological efficacy. During short observation time a beneficial effect on CD4-count was observed.
...
PMID:Virological efficacy and plasma drug concentrations of nelfinavir plus saquinavir as salvage therapy in HIV-infected patients refractory to standard triple therapy. 1006 40

(1) Recent consensus recommendations agree that first-line treatment of HIV infection should consist of a three-drug regimen combining a protease inhibitor and two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Some recommendations specifically advise against using the current formulation of saquinavir, but none express a preference for one of the other three protease inhibitors currently marketed in France (indinavir, nelfinavir and ritonavir). (2) These HIV protease inhibitors have established efficacy on viral load and the CD4+ lymphocyte count. Saquinavir may have lower virological efficacy. (3) The clinical efficacy of three-drug regimens containing indinavir or saquinavir is well demonstrated in patients at an advanced stage of HIV disease. (4) The risk of viral resistance is not currently a factor in choosing a HIV protease inhibitors. (5) Several epidemiological studies have compared the risk of adverse effects on three-drug regimens including indinavir, ritonavir or saquinavir. In these studies saquinavir was the best-tolerated drug and ritonavir the worst-tolerated. (6) Ritonavir interacts with many drugs. The poor bioavailability of the current saquinavir formulation also leads to risk of interactions. (7) Treatment constraints differ from one protease inhibitor to another, and these must be taken into account case by case. (8) The daily cost of treatment is not currently an important factor in choosing among the various preparations. (9) Taking into account efficacy, adverse effects, interactions and treatment constraints, the combination of indinavir with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors currently seems to be the best choice for the largest number of patients. (10) If problems of compliance arise, nelfinavir can be an alternative to indinavir. (11) In patients at an advanced stage of HIV disease who comply well with their treatment, saquinavir can also be an alternative to indinavir.
...
PMID:The choice of HIV protease inhibitor: indinavir is currently the best option. 1084 67


1 2 3 4 5 Next >>

---