Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:2.7.11.8 (FAST)
 758 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The universal nature of the stimulant or euphoric effect of addictive drugs suggests that it may be an important predictor of a drug's addiction potential. Furthermore, assessment of stimulant sensitivity could be useful for predicting the liability of individuals to drug abuse. The stimulant actions of abused drugs from different pharmacological classes may share a common biological mechanism. We investigated this notion by assessing the drug responses relative to base-line locomotor activity of mice selectively bred for increased (FAST) and reduced (SLOW) sensitivity to ethanol-induced stimulation. FAST mice were more sensitive than SLOW mice to the stimulant effects of methanol (1.5-3.0 g/kg), t-butanol (0.2-0.6 g/kg), n-propanol (0.15-1.2 g/kg), pentobarbital (10-40 mg/kg) and phenobarbital (15-120 mg/kg). FAST and SLOW mice were similarly stimulated by d-amphetamine (1.25-10 mg/kg) and caffeine (2.5-20 mg/kg). The activity of FAST and SLOW mice was equally depressed by nicotine (0.5-2.0 mg/kg) and morphine (4-75 mg/kg). Finally, FAST mice were unaffected, whereas SLOW mice were depressed by diazepam (1-8 mg/kg). Selection for relative sensitivity to stimulation by ethanol has generalized to other alcohols and to barbiturates, but not to several other abused drugs, including amphetamine. The data presented here support a hypothesized common mechanism of stimulant action for alcohols and barbiturates, and suggest that differences in sensitivity to drug stimulant effects can be seen in the absence of dopamine system differences.
 ...
PMID:Acute sensitivity of FAST and SLOW mice to the effects of abused drugs on locomotor activity. 157 69

The effects of 24 hours of food deprivation on the subjective response to 10 mg oral d-amphetamine were studied in 12 healthy normal volunteers. A within-subjects design was used in which subjects ingested amphetamine and placebo capsules in both a fed and a fasting state. Each of the four experimental conditions-FED/DRUG, FED/PLACEBO, FAST/DRUG, FAST/PLACEBO--was enacted twice according to a randomized block design. Three subjective effects questionnaires, the Profile of Mood States, the Addiction Research Center Inventory, and the Visual Analogue Scale, were completed prior to and 1, 3 and 6 hr after the early morning capsule ingestion. Typical elevations in such subjective effects as elation and vigor were obtained after amphetamine ingestion in both feeding conditions, but fasting neither potentiated nor attenuated the drug response. Subjects at the end of the session, however, were more likely in the FAST/DRUG condition than in the FED/DRUG condition to label the capsule they had ingested at the beginning of the session as a stimulant.
 ...
PMID:Effects of food deprivation on subjective responses to d-amphetamine in humans. 262 32

Alcohol-induced locomotor stimulation in mice may provide an animal model of human euphoric responses to moderate alcohol (ethanol) doses. If a common mechanism mediates sensitivity to both drug reward (reinforcement) and drug stimulation, rodent models of drug stimulation would provide powerful tools for investigating drug reinforcement. In addition, stimulant sensitivity might provide a simple marker for susceptibility to ethanol reward, and perhaps addiction (e.g., Newlin and Thomson, 1991). This short report describes the use of three genetic mouse models, (1) FAST and SLOW selectively bred lines, (2) BXD Recombinant Inbred Strains, and (3) a panel of inbred strains of diverse genetic origin, to explore mechanisms mediating ethanol stimulation and reinforcement.
 ...
PMID:Use of genetically distinct mouse populations to explore ethanol reinforcement. 774 38

Ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation has been proposed to be positively correlated with the rewarding effects of ethanol (Wise and Bozarth 1987). The present experiments provided a test of this hypothesis using a genetic model. Three behavioral indices of the motivational effects of ethanol (drinking, taste conditioning, place conditioning) were examined in mice from two independent FAST lines, selectively bred for sensitivity to ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation, and mice from two independent SLOW lines, selectively bred for insensitivity to ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation. In a single-bottle procedure, mice were allowed access to drinking tubes containing ethanol in a concentration (1-12% v/v) that increased over 24 consecutive days. FAST mice consumed greater amounts of ethanol solution. In a two-bottle procedure, mice were allowed access to tubes containing water or various concentrations of ethanol (2-8% v/v) over 6 days. FAST mice generally showed greater preference for ethanol solutions than SLOW mice. In a conditioned taste aversion procedure, mice received access to saccharin solution followed by injection of 2.5 g/kg ethanol (IP). SLOW mice developed aversion to the saccharin flavor more readily than FAST mice. In a series of place conditioning experiments, tactile stimuli were paired with various doses of ethanol (0.8-2.0 g/kg). During conditioning, FAST mice showed locomotor stimulation after 1.0, 1.2 and 2.0 g/kg ethanol while SLOW mice did not. During testing, mice conditioned with 1.2 g/kg and 2.0 g/kg ethanol showed conditioned place preference, but there were no line differences in magnitude of preference. These results indicate that genetic selection for sensitivity to ethanol-stimulated activity has resulted in genetic differences in ethanol drinking and ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion but not ethanol-induced conditioned place preference. Overall, these data provide mixed support for the psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction.
 ...
PMID:Motivational properties of ethanol in mice selectively bred for ethanol-induced locomotor differences. 786 50

Increased recognition of the advantages of genetic animal models has led to heightened interest in their use and development. A replicated bidirectional selective breeding project has produced lines of mice that differ in their locomotor responses to 2.0 g/kg ethanol. FAST-1 and FAST-2 mice are highly stimulated by ethanol (EtOH), whereas SLOW-1 and SLOW-2 mice are either not affected or respond with locomotor depression. Current heritability estimates indicate that approximately 6-8% of the response variance in the FAST lines and 2-10% of the response variance in the SLOW lines is of additive genetic origin. Little systematic response to selection has occurred in recent generations, which implies that the limits of selection have been reached. Analysis of saline activity over 35 generations of selection indicates that baseline activities have not changed during the course of selection in three of the lines, whereas baseline activity of FAST-1 mice has increased slightly. In EtOH dose-response studies (0.5-3.0 g/kg), FAST mice had biphasic dose-response curves, whereas the locomotor activity of SLOW mice was either unaffected or depressed by all doses of EtOH. In addition, FAST mice spent more time in motion, traveled farther per movement, traversed greater distances in the center of the test chamber, and ambulated more quickly than SLOW mice when given EtOH. FAST and SLOW mice differed in EtOH clearance rates; however, the differences were slight relative to the large difference in locomotor response. We encourage the use of FAST and SLOW mice to investigate neurophysiological factors underlying sensitivity to the behavioral effects of EtOH, with a view to further testing of the postulated homology between locomotor stimulant effects and addiction potential of drugs of abuse.
 ...
PMID:Bidirectional selective breeding for ethanol effects on locomotor activity: characterization of FAST and SLOW mice through selection generation 35. 856 Dec 96

Neuroanatomical research suggests that interactions between dopamine and glutamate within the mesolimbic dopamine system are involved in both drug-induced locomotor stimulation and addiction. Therefore, genetically determined differences in the locomotor responses to ethanol and cocaine may be related to differences in the effects of these drugs on this system. To test this, we measured drug-induced changes in dopamine and glutamate within the nucleus accumbens (NAcc), a major target of mesolimbic dopamine neurons, using in vivo microdialysis in selectively bred FAST and SLOW mouse lines, which were bred for extreme sensitivity (FAST) and insensitivity (SLOW) to the locomotor stimulant effects of ethanol. These mice also show a genetically correlated difference in stimulant response to cocaine (FAST > SLOW). Single injections of ethanol (2 g/kg) or cocaine (40 mg/kg) resulted in larger increases in dopamine within the NAcc in FAST compared with SLOW mice. There was no effect of either drug on NAcc glutamate levels. These experiments indicate that response of the mesolimbic dopamine system is genetically correlated with sensitivity to ethanol- and cocaine-induced locomotion. Because increased sensitivity to the stimulating effects of ethanol appears to be associated with greater risk for alcohol abuse, genetically determined differences in the mesolimbic dopamine response to ethanol may represent a critical underlying mechanism for increased genetic risk for alcoholism.
 ...
PMID:Ethanol- and cocaine-induced locomotion are genetically related to increases in accumbal dopamine. 1922 Apr 81

To improve outcomes for people with substance dependence and HIV infection or at risk for HIV infection, patients were enrolled in a primary care-based addiction treatment program from 2008-2012 that included a comprehensive substance use assessment, individual and group counseling, addiction pharmacotherapy and case management. We examined whether predisposing characteristics (depression, housing status, polysubstance use) and an enabling resource (buprenorphine treatment) were associated with engagement in the program and persistent substance dependence at 6 months. At program enrollment 61% were HIV-infected, 53% reported heroin use, 46% reported alcohol use, 37% reported cocaine use, and 28% reported marijuana use in the past 30 days, 72% reported depression, 19% were homeless, and 53% had polysubstance use. Within 6-months 60% had been treated with buprenorphine. Engagement (defined as 2 visits in first 14 days and 2 additional visits in next 30 days) occurred in 64%; 49% had substance dependence at 6-months. Receipt of buprenorphine treatment was associated with engagement (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) 8.32 95% CI: 4.13-16.77). Self-reported depression at baseline was associated with substance dependence at 6-months (AOR 3.30 95% CI: 1.65-6.61). Neither housing status nor polysubstance use was associated with engagement or substance dependence. The FAST PATH program successfully engaged and treated patients in a primary care-based addiction treatment program. Buprenorphine, a partial opioid agonist, was a major driver of addiction treatment engagement. Given depression's association with adverse outcomes in this clinical population, including mental health treatment as part of integrated care holds potential to improve addiction treatment outcomes.
...
PMID:Engagement and Substance Dependence in a Primary Care-Based Addiction Treatment Program for People Infected with HIV and People at High-Risk for HIV Infection. 2629 99