Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:2.7.11.8 (FAST)
 758 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In a group of 242 community-dwelling patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), a longitudinal comparison was made of two caregiver-administered instruments for assessment of behavioral disturbance; the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) and the CERAD Behavioral Rating Scale for Dementia (BRSD). We examined records of the 206 patients with baseline and 12-month follow-up data for the CMAI and the BRSD who also had tests of cognitive (Mini-mental State; MMSE) and global function (Clinical Dementia Rating; CDR and Functional Assessment Staging; FAST). Among 114 AD subjects, the correlation between total CMAI at baseline and 1 month readministration was 0.83 (p < 0.0001). In the same subjects, stratified into 5 groups by MMSE scores, the correlations between BRSD baseline and 1-month scores ranged from 0.70-0.89 (p < 0.0001). There was high correlation between total scores of both instruments at baseline and 12 months. In addition, all CMAI subscales except Verbally Aggressive correlated significantly with total BRSD score at both time points. At baseline, BRSD subscales for irritability/aggression, behavioral dysregulation and psychotic symptoms and at 12 months, irritability/aggression and behavioral dysregulation correlated with total CMAI scores. Neither scale changed significantly over 1 year, but there was wide individual variation. CMAI and BRSD scores correlated with 1-year change in the FAST, but not with MMSE or CDR (which weighs cognition heavily), suggesting that behavioral disturbance may be more strongly related to ability to manage activities of daily living (executive function) than to other aspects of cognition. The CMAI and BRSD appear to be interchangeable as measures of agitation, with the CMAI possibly more useful for patients who lack language and the BRSD more sensitive to apathy and depression.
 ...
PMID:A comparison of the Cohen-Mansfield agitation inventory with the CERAD behavioral rating scale for dementia in community-dwelling persons with Alzheimer's disease. 984 50

In 2012, the US National Institute of Mental Health launched three clinical trial contracts under a new FAST initiative. The overall goal for these contracts (Fast-Fail Trials) was to focus early-stage trials, testing novel pharmacologic agents that target the central nervous system, on pharmacologic-based designs to objectively identify doses that produce central nervous system effects. The three contracts targeted different psychiatric populations: psychotic (FAST-PS), mood and anxiety (FAST-MAS), and autism spectrum disorders (FAST-AS). The FAST initiative was a first attempt for the National Institute of Mental Health to adapt an experimental medicine approach to its clinical trial portfolio. As the Fast-Fail trials implemented this new approach for the field, we present the rationale for each trial, design considerations, results, and how each one contributed new knowledge to the field of psychopharmacology; important lessons for pharma and biotech. Under the FAST initiative, the National Institute of Mental Health assembled research teams with a broad range of expertise, who developed and validated the outcome measures and study protocol, and conducted multi-site clinical trials, testing candidate compounds. In the FAST-PS contract, the team validated an imaging-based pharmacodynamic biomarker of the effect of ketamine in the brain that could be utilized in subsequent clinical trials. The initial FAST-AS study was an important first step in the design of early-stage target-engagement trials in autism spectrum disorder, suggesting that a resting electroencephalogram can be used as a pharmacodynamic measure in future studies. The FAST-MAS study showed that blocking the kappa-opioid receptor significantly affects functional magnetic resonance imaging ventral striatal activation in the monetary incentive delay task in anticipation of gain. Together, the outcomes of the FAST-FAIL trials demonstrated the importance of rigorously designed and informative central nervous system trials, including the value of pharmacodynamic measures in early-stage trials. Use of these measures furthered our knowledge about the relationship between specific molecular mechanisms, brain effects, and therapeutic effects in patients with mental illnesses.
 ...
PMID:The NIMH 'Fast-Fail Trials' (FAST) Initiative: Rationale, Promise, and Progress. 3270 69