Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:2.7.11.1 (protein kinase)
 81,284 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Prostaglandins (PGs), particularly PGE(2), can stimulate bone resorption and formation and auto-amplify their effects by inducing cyclooxygenase (COX)-2. We examined the role of different PG receptors in stimulating cAMP production and COX-2 expression in murine calvarial osteoblasts. Cells were obtained from PGE(2) receptor (EP2R and EP4R) wild-type and knockout (KO) mice and from mice transgenic for the COX-2 promoter fused to a luciferase reporter. We analyzed effects of selective agonists, EP2A and EP4A, for EP2R and EP4R, which mediate the increase in cAMP in response to PGE(2). We also tested agonists for other PGE(2) receptors (EP1A and EP3A) and for prostacyclin (IPA), prostaglandin D(2) (DPA), thromboxane (TPA), and prostaglandin F(2alpha) (FPA) receptors. PGE(2) and EP2A were the most effective stimulators of cAMP production. EP4A, IPA, and DPA produced smaller responses, and EP1A, EP3A, FPA, and TPA were ineffective. In EP2R KO cells, cAMP responses to PGE(2) were reduced by 80%, and responses to EP2A were abrogated. In EP4R KO cells, cAMP responses to PGE(2) and EP2A showed a small reduction, while the response to EP4A was abrogated. Pretreatment with PGE(2), EP2A, or EP4A down-regulated the subsequent response to the respective ligands. COX-2 induction was measured by increased luciferase activity and mRNA expression. PGE(2) was the most effective agonist; EP2A and another selective EP2R agonist, butaprost, showed similar efficacy, and EP4A was less effective. EP2A and EP4A effects on luciferase activity were additive, and effects of the combination were similar to PGE(2) itself. IPA, TPA, and DPA produced 2- to 6-fold increases in COX-2 expression. FPA was a weak agonist, while EP1A and EP3A were inactive. Treatment with specific inhibitors indicated that PGE(2), EP2A, and EP4A induced COX-2 expression largely through protein kinase A (PKA). We conclude that the PG induction of COX-2 in this system generally paralleled effects on cAMP production and was mediated predominantly via the PKA pathway.
 ...
PMID:Stimulation of cAMP production and cyclooxygenase-2 by prostaglandin E(2) and selective prostaglandin receptor agonists in murine osteoblastic cells. 1512 Oct 14

Of the four prostaglandin (PG) E receptor subtypes (EP1-EP4), EP2 and EP4 have been proposed to mediate the anabolic action of PGE(2) on bone formation but comparative evaluation studies of EPs on bone formation do not necessarily share a common mechanism, implying that their additional features including downstream MAPK pathways may be beneficial to resolve this issue. We systematically assessed the roles of EPs in the rat calvaria (RC) cell culture model by using four selective EP agonists (EPAs). Consistent with relative expression levels of the respective receptors, multiple phenotypic traits of bone formation in vitro, including proliferation of nodule-associated cells, osteoblast marker expression and mineralized nodule formation were upregulated not only by PGE(2) but equally by EP2A and EP4A, but not by EP1A and EP3A. EP2A and EP4A were effective when cells were treated chronically or pulse-treated during nascent nodule formation. EP2A and EP4A equally stimulated the endogenous PGE(2) production, while EP2A caused a greater increase in cAMP production and c-Fos gene expression compared to EP4A. EP2A and EP4A activated predominantly p38 MAPK and ERK respectively, while c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) was equally activated by both agonists. SB203580 (p38 MAPK inhibitor) blocked the PGE(2) effect on mineralized nodule formation, while U0126 (ERK inhibitor) and dicumarol (JNK inhibitor) were less effective. PGE(2)-dependent phosphorylation of the MAPKs was affected not only by protein kinase (PK)A and PKC inhibitors but also by adenylate cyclase and PKC activators. Co-treatment of RC cells with EP2A or EP4A and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)2, whose effects on bone nodule formation is known to be, in part, mediated through the PKA and p38 MAPK pathways, resulted in an additive effect on mineralized nodule formation. Further, PGE(2), EP2A and EP4A did not increase BMP2/4 mRNA levels in RC cells, and EP2-induced phosphorylation of p38 MAPK was not eliminated by Noggin. These results suggest that, in the RC cell model, the anabolic actions of PGE(2) on mineralized nodule formation are mediated at least in part by activation of the EP2 and EP4 receptor subtype-specific MAPK pathways, independently of BMP signaling, in cells associated with nascent bone nodules.
 ...
PMID:EP2 and EP4 receptors differentially mediate MAPK pathways underlying anabolic actions of prostaglandin E2 on bone formation in rat calvaria cell cultures. 1923 24