Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: EC:2.7.10.2 (
focal adhesion kinase
)
44,029
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
Chlamydia trachomatis is one of the important pathogens of
STD
in our country. Therefore, rapid accurate, reliable and convenient tests for its detection are required. So far, IDEIA Chlamydia has been employed as a useful diagnostic kit. Now, IDEIA
PCE
Chlamydia, applied as a dual amplification EIA method, has been developed. In our present studies, the sensitivity, reproducibility, cross reactivity, and reliability of IDEIA
PCE
Chlamydia were investigated and compared with those of IDEIA Chlamydia and LCR Chlamydia. The sensitivity of IDEIA
PCE
Chlamydia showed 2.4 x 10(2) IFU/ml for C. trachomatis D, 1.2 x 10(2) IFU/ml for C. trachomatis E, 3.8 x 10 IFU/ml for C. trachomatis F, and 1.25 x 10(2) IFU/ml for C. trachomatis L2. With regard to reproducibility, more than 2.4 x 10(2) IFU/ml of all strains of C. trachomatis and negative samples gave highly reproducible values. Though no cross reactivity was recognized among three strains of Staphylococcus aureus with concentrations of more than 10(9) IFU/ml, non-heated samples of over 10(6) CFU/ml showed cross reactivity. In our observations, phosphate, Mg2+, Ca2+, and Fe3+ inhibited the efficacy of both IDEIA and IDEIA
PCE
Chlamydia. Ca2+ per se could be an inhibitor in the case of urine samples analyzed by IDEIA and IDEIA
PCE
Chlamydia. These results indicate that IDEIA
PCE
Chlamydia kit for detection of C. trachomatis may be clinically useful because of its improved sensitivity over IDEIA Chlamydia and its invariable specificity and reliability.
...
PMID:[Basic evaluation of Chlamydia antigen detection by EIA using a dual amplification enhanced immunoassay method]. 950 84
A clinical study of patients with male urethritis (n=316) was undertaken to determine the sensitivity potential for a new dual amplified immunoassay (IDEIA
PCE
Chlamydia). Increased sensitivity (98.8%, 84/85) was obtained for IDEIA
PCE
Chlamydia compared to a conventional antigen detection test (IDEIA Chlamydia, 81.2%, 69/85) when testing urine samples. In a smaller patient population (n=104) the positivity rate for the first-void urine tested with IDEIA
PCE
Chlamydia of 30.8% (32/104) was similar to the 27.9% (29/104) obtained from urethral swabs tested with a DNA probe assay (PACE 2). The increased sensitivity of the test was confirmed with a commercial PCR kit (Amplicor) and nested PCR. The IDEIA
PCE
Chlamydia kit has the sensitivity potential to be a clinically reliable alternative for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis.
Int J
STD
AIDS 1998 Jul
PMID:Clinical study of the effectiveness of a dual amplified immunoassay (IDEIA PCE Chlamydia) for the diagnosis of male urethritis. 969 98
A study was undertaken with different serovars (D, E, F, L2, MoPn) of Chlamydia trachomatis to determine the analytical sensitivity of a new dual amplified immunoassay (IDEIA
PCE
Chlamydia) for detecting chlamydial lipopolysaccharide. IDEIA
PCE
Chlamydia incorporates a polymer conjugate consisting of multiple copies of antibody and enzyme molecules to provide signal amplification. The test was also assessed with different protein A producing strains of Staphylococcus aureus in order to assess whether the use of a multiple antibody conjugate increased nonspecific binding. The detection limits varied for each serovar with a detection limit of 38 IFU/ml obtained with serovar F and 237 IFU/ml obtained with serovar D. The incorporation of the polymer conjugate resulted in a 2-5 fold increase in analytical sensitivity compared to an earlier version of the test using a conventional conjugate. No increase in cross reactivity with protein A producing strains of S. aureus was obtained. The new dual amplified test format offers potential as a sensitive low-cost screening assay for C. trachomatis infections.
Int J
STD
AIDS 1999 Jul
PMID:Reactivity of a dual amplified chlamydia immunoassay with different serovars of Chlamydia trachomatis. 1072 52
Our objective was to compare 3 deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) amplification methods for the diagnosis of chlamydial infection with an enhanced enzyme immunoassay (EIA) method for antigen detection in urine samples, from men with non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU) attending a busy inner city genitourinary medicine centre. Urethral swabs and urine samples were collected from 346 male patients with NGU attending the clinic. All swabs and urines were tested for chlamydial infection (CT) using the EIA (Dako
PCE
immunoassay). Three aliquots of the urine samples were stored immediately at -70 degrees C for subsequent testing by: Amplicor polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (Hoffmann-La Roche, Switzerland); the amplified Chlamydia trachomatis assay (AMP CT) using transcription mediated amplification (TMA) (GenProbe, USA); and BDProbeTecET using the strand displacement assay (SDA) (Becton Dickinson, USA). The positive rate for the 3 amplified assays PCR, TMA and SDA (on urine) was 88/346 (25.4%), 80/346 (23.1%) and 88/346 (25.4%), respectively compared to 56/346 (16.2%) by EIA on urethral swabs, the current means of diagnosis in this laboratory. Thirty-one samples were positive in 2 or more of the amplification assays but negative in the EIA, 50 positives (53% sensitivity) detected in the urine samples by the EIA assay were detected by all 3 of the amplified assays. Three samples were positive by PCR only, 5 were positive by TMA only and 7 were positive by SDA only. DNA amplification assays are superior to standard immunoassays for the diagnosis of C. trachomatis infections in urine samples. Urine samples are suitable for use in these amplified assays to detect C. trachomatis. Freezing of samples before testing reduces the rate of inhibition reported in other published studies.
Int J
STD
AIDS 2001 Dec
PMID:The detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by DNA amplification methods in urine samples from men with urethritis. 1177 69