Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:2.7.1.1 (hexokinase)
 5,274 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Homogenates of insulin-producing tumoral cells catalyzed the phosphorylation of glucose, mannose, and fructose. The kinetics of phosphorylation at increasing glucose concentrations, the inhibitory effect of glucose 6-phosphate, and the comparison of results obtained with distinct hexoses indicated the presence of both low-Km hexokinase-like and high-Km enzymatic activities, the results being grossly comparable to those collected in normal pancreatic islets. Relative to protein content, the glucose-phosphorylating enzymatic activity was higher in tumoral than normal islet cells. The activity of other enzymes was either lower (glutamate dehydrogenase), moderately higher (phosphoglucomutase, lactate dehydrogenase) or considerably greater (ornithine decarboxylase) in tumoral than in normal islet cells. In intact tumoral cells, incubated under increasing glucose concentrations, the oxidation of D-[U-14C]glucose and the output of lactic and pyruvic acids reached a close-to-maximal value at 2.8 mM glucose. The ratios for glucose oxidation/utilization and lactate/pyruvate output were much lower in tumoral than in normal islet cells. Although glucose caused a modest increase in insulin output from the tumoral cells, this effect was saturated at a low glucose concentration (2.8 mM) and less marked than that of other secretagogues (e.g., L-leucine, L-ornithine, or forskolin). Thus, despite a close-to-normal enzymatic equipment for glucose phosphorylation, the tumoral cells displayed severe abnormalities in the metabolism and secretory response to this hexose. These findings point to regulatory mechanisms distal to glucose phosphorylation in the control of glucose metabolism in insulin-producing cells.
 ...
PMID:Glucose metabolism in insulin-producing tumoral cells. 389 13

Mitogenic stimulation of quiescent cells not only triggers the cell division cycle but also induces an increase in cell volume, associated with an activation of cellular metabolism. It is therefore likely that genes encoding enzymes and other proteins involved in energy metabolism and biosynthetic pathways represent a major class of mitogen-induced genes. In the present study, we investigated in the non-established human fibroblast line WI-38 the induction by mitogens of 17 genes whose products play a role in different metabolic processes. We show that these genes fall into 4 different categories, i.e. non-induced genes, immediate early (IE) primary genes, delayed early (DE) secondary genes and late genes reaching peak levels in S-phase. In addition, we have analysed the regulation of these genes during normal cell cycle progression, using HL-60 cells separated by counterflow elutriation. A clear cell cycle regulation was seen with those genes that are induced in S-phase, i.e. thymidine kinase, thymidylate synthase and dihydrofolate reductase. In addition, two DE genes showed a cell cycle dependent expression. Ornithine decarboxylase mRNA increased around mid-G1, reaching maximum levels in S/G2, while hexokinase mRNA expression was highest in early G1. In contrast, the expression of other DE and IE genes did not fluctuate during the cell cycle, a result that was confirmed with elutriated WI-38 and serum-stimulated HL-60 cells. These observations suggest that G0-->S and G1-->S transition are distinct processes, exhibiting characteristic programmes of gene regulation, and merging around S-phase entry.
 ...
PMID:Differential induction of 'metabolic genes' after mitogen stimulation and during normal cell cycle progression. 751 13

We identified a near-full-length cDNA clone encoding ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) from tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). It contained a small upstream open reading frame (uORF) within its 5' untranslated region. An in vitro translation assay demonstrated that the uORF repressed expression of downstream ORF. Neither nucleotide nor predicted peptide sequence of the uORF was responsible for the repression. The presence of upstream AUG codon was shown to be responsible. ODC expression appeared to be organ specific. The ODC gene was expressed in roots, hypocotyls and sink leaves but not in source leaves. ODC transcripts were observed in apical meristem of primary roots, and were distributed in cells of cortex layer preferentially. ODC expression responded immediately to sucrose availability via the sucrose-specific pathway independent of hexokinase. Sucrose induction of ODC gene was seen in roots, hypocotyls and flowers but not in mature leaves. Moreover, only the root apical meristem responded to sucrose availability. These observations indicate that the spatial pattern of ODC expression is closely associated with cell proliferation and that sucrose sensing plays a major role in the spatial pattern of ODC expression. Also, the differential regulation of ODC and arginine decarboxylase gene expression by factors modulating plant growth suggests that they would have different physiological roles in plant development.
 ...
PMID:The regulation of ornithine decarboxylase gene expression by sucrose and small upstream open reading frame in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). 1126 83