Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: EC:2.5.1.18 (
glutathione S-transferase
)
22,582
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
The
serum response factor
(
SRF
) is a 67-kDa phosphoprotein that, together with auxiliary factors, modulates transcription of immediate early genes containing serum response elements in their promoters. Here we show that the carboxyl-terminal domain of human
SRF
is phosphorylated in vivo and is recognized in vitro by the double-stranded DNA-activated serine/threonine-specific protein kinase, DNA-PK.
SRF
phosphorylation by DNA-PK was stimulated by its cognate binding site. Protein microsequence analysis of a 22-amino acid synthetic
SRF
peptide and phosphopeptide analysis of genetically altered
glutathione S-transferase
-
SRF
fusion proteins identified Ser-435 and Ser-446 of human
SRF
as sites phosphorylated by DNA-PK. Both serines are followed by glutamine. Changing Gln-436 and Gln-447 to other residues reduced or eliminated phosphorylation by DNA-PK, confirming that these glutamines are important determinants for kinase recognition. The carboxyl-terminal transcription activation domain was mapped within a 71-amino acid region that contains both DNA-PK phosphorylation sites. Amino acid substitutions that interfered with phosphorylation by DNA-PK at Ser-435/446 in GAL4-
SRF
fusion proteins were reduced in transactivation potency. From these data we suggest that DNA-PK phosphorylation may modulate
SRF
activity in vivo.
...
PMID:The carboxyl-terminal transactivation domain of human serum response factor contains DNA-activated protein kinase phosphorylation sites. 840 51
EWS-FLI-1 is a chimeric protein produced in most Ewing's sarcomas. It results from the fusion of the N-terminal-encoding region of the EWS gene to the C-terminal DNA-binding domain (the ETS domain) encoded by the FLI-1 ets family gene. Both EWS-FLI-1 and FLI-1 proteins function as transcription factors that bind specifically to ets sequences (the ets boxes) present in promoter elements. EWS- FLI-1 is a powerful transforming protein, whereas FLI-1 is not. In a search for potential DNA binding sites for these two proteins, we have tested their ability to recognize the serum responsive element (SRE) in the c-fos promoter. This cis element contains an ets box which can be occupied by members of the ETS protein family which do not bind DNA autonomously but form a ternary complex with a second protein, p67SRF (serum responsive factor). We demonstrate here that EWS-FLI-1, but not FLI-1, is able to form a ternary complex on the c-fos SRE. Using a
GST
pull-down assay, we show that both FLI-1 and EWS-FLI-1 interact in vitro with
SRF
in the absence of DNA. In electromobility shift assays, EWS-FLI-1 binding to the SRE is detectable in the absence of
SRF
whereas the binding of FLI-1 is not, suggesting that the interaction with DNA is the step which limits ternary complex formation by FLI-1. Deletion of the N-terminal portion of FLI-1 resulted in a protein which behaved as EWS-FLI-1, suggesting the existence of an N- terminal inhibitory domain in the normal protein. Taken together, our data indicate that there are intrinsic differences in the binding of EWS-FLI-1 and FLI-1 proteins to distinct ets sequences.
...
PMID:SRE elements are binding sites for the fusion protein EWS-FLI-1. 860 38
Terminal differentiation of muscle cells results in opposite effects on gene promoters: muscle-specific promoters, which are repressed during active proliferation of myoblasts, are turned on, whereas at least some proliferation-associated promoters, such as c-fos, which are active during cell division, are turned off. MyoD and myogenin, transcription factors from the basic-helix-loop-helix (bHLH) family, are involved in both processes, up-regulating muscle genes and down-regulating c-fos. On the other hand, the
serum response factor
(
SRF
) is involved in the activation of muscle-specific genes, such as c-fos, as well as in the up-regulation of a subset of genes that are responsive to mitogens. Upon terminal differentiation, the activity of these various transcription factors could be modulated by the formation of distinct protein-protein complexes. Here, we have investigated the hypothesis that the function of
SRF
and/or MyoD and myogenin could be modulated by a physical association between these transcription factors. We show that myogenin from differentiating myoblasts specifically binds to
SRF
. In vitro analysis, using the
glutathione S-transferase
pull-down assay, indicates that
SRF
-myogenin interactions occur only with myogenin-E12 heterodimers and not with isolated myogenin. A physical interaction between myogenin, E12, and
SRF
could also be demonstrated in vivo using a triple-hybrid approach in yeast. Glutathione S-transferase pull-down analysis of various mutants of the proteins demonstrated that the bHLH domain of myogenin and that of E12 were necessary and sufficient for the interaction to be observed. Specific binding to
SRF
was also seen with MyoD. In contrast, Id, a natural inhibitor of myogenic bHLH proteins, did not bind
SRF
in any of the situations tested. These data suggest that
SRF
, on one hand, and myogenic bHLH, on the other, could modulate each other's activity through the formation of a heterotrimeric complex.
...
PMID:Physical interaction between the mitogen-responsive serum response factor and myogenic basic-helix-loop-helix proteins. 861 11
Steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1) specifically bound to
serum response factor
(
SRF
), as demonstrated by
glutathione S-transferase
pull down assays, and the yeast and mammalian two-hybrid tests. In mammalian cells, SRC-1 potentiated serum response element (SRE)-mediated transactivations in a dose-dependent manner. Coexpression of p300 synergistically enhanced this SRC-1-potentiated level of transactivations, consistent with the recent finding (Ramirez, S., Ali, S. A. S., Robin, P., Trouche, D., and Harel-Bellan, A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 31016-31021) in which the p300 homologue CREB-binding protein was shown to be a transcription coactivator of
SRF
. Thus, we concluded that at least two distinct classes of coactivator molecules may cooperate to regulate
SRF
-dependent transactivations in vivo.
...
PMID:Steroid receptor coactivator-1 interacts with serum response factor and coactivates serum response element-mediated transactivations. 978 46
We used the yeast two-hybrid system to show that the
serum response factor
(
SRF
) and zinc-fingers and homeobox 1 (ZHXI) proteins interact with the A subunit of nuclear factor-Y (NF-YA).
GST
pulldown assays revealed that both proteins interact specifically with NF-YA in vitro. Amino acids located between 272 and 564, a region that contains two homeodomains, are required for the interaction of ZHX1 with NF-YA. Two different domains of NF-YA, a glutamine-rich region and a serine/threonine-rich region, are necessary for the interactions with ZHX1 and
SRF
, respectively.
...
PMID:Identification of proteins that interact with NF-YA. 1057 Oct 58
Silencing mediator of retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptors (SMRT) is known to interact with Sin3 and recruit the histone deacetylases (HDACs) that lead to hypoacetylation of histones and transrepression of target transcription factors. Herein, we found that coexpression of SMRT significantly repressed transactivations by activating protein-1 (AP-1), nuclear factor-kappaB (NFkappaB), and
serum response factor
(
SRF
) in a dose-dependent manner, but not in the presence of trichostatin A, a specific inhibitor of HDAC. Similarly, coexpression of HDAC1 and mSin3A also showed repressive effects. Consistent with these results, the C-terminal region of SMRT directly interacted with
SRF
, the AP-1 components c-Jun and c-Fos, and the NFkappaB components p50 and p65, as demonstrated by the yeast and mammalian two hybrid tests as well as the
glutathione S-transferase
pull down assays. Thus, we concluded that SMRT serves to recruit Sin3/HDACs to
SRF
, NFkappaB, and AP-1 in vivo and modulate their transactivation.
...
PMID:Silencing mediator of retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptors, as a novel transcriptional corepressor molecule of activating protein-1, nuclear factor-kappaB, and serum response factor. 1077 32
ASC-2 was recently discovered as a cancer-amplified transcription coactivator molecule of nuclear receptors, which interacts with multifunctional transcription integrators steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1) and CREB-binding protein (CBP)/p300. Herein, we report the identification of three mitogenic transcription factors as novel target molecules of ASC-2. First, the C-terminal transactivation domain of
serum response factor
(
SRF
) was identified among a series of ASC-2-interacting proteins from the yeast two-hybrid screening. Second, ASC-2 specifically interacted with the activating protein-1 (AP-1) components c-Jun and c-Fos as well as the nuclear factor-kappaB (NFkappaB) components p50 and p65, as demonstrated by the
glutathione S-transferase
pull-down assays as well as the yeast two-hybrid tests. In cotransfection of mammalian cells, ASC-2 potentiated transactivations by
SRF
, AP-1, and NFkappaB in a dose-dependent manner, either alone or in conjunction with SRC-1 and p300. In addition, ASC-2 efficiently relieved the previously described transrepression between nuclear receptors and either AP-1 or NFkappaB. Overall, these results suggest that the nuclear receptor coactivator ASC-2 also mediates transactivations by
SRF
, AP-1, and NFkappaB, which may contribute to the putative, ASC-2-mediated tumorigenesis.
...
PMID:Activating protein-1, nuclear factor-kappaB, and serum response factor as novel target molecules of the cancer-amplified transcription coactivator ASC-2. 1084 92
Proliferative signals lead to the rapid and transient induction of the c-fos proto-oncogene by targeting the ternary complex assembled on the serum response element (SRE). Transactivation by both components of this complex,
serum response factor
(
SRF
) and the ternary complex factor Elk-1, can be potentiated by the coactivator CREB-binding protein (CBP). We report a novel interaction between the bromodomain of CBP, amino acids 1100-1286, and Elk-1. DNA binding and
glutathione S-transferase
pull-down assays demonstrate that binding requires Elk-1(1-212) but not the C-terminal transactivation domain. Competition and antibody controls show that the bromocomplex involves both
SRF
and Elk-1 on the c-fos SRE and uniquely Elk-1 on the E74 Ets binding site. Interestingly, methylation interference and DNA footprinting analyses show almost indistinguishable patterns between ternary and bromocomplexes, suggesting that CBP-(1100-1286) interacts via Elk-1 and does not require specific DNA contacts. Functionally, the bromocomplex blocks activation, because cotransfection of CBP-(1100-1286) reduces RasV12-driven activation of SRE and E74 luciferase reporters. Repression is relieved moderately or strongly by linking the bromodomain to the N- or C-terminal transactivation domains of CBP, respectively. These results are consistent with a model in which CBP is constitutively bound to the SRE in a higher order complex that would facilitate the rapid transcriptional activation of c-fos by signaling-driven phosphorylation.
...
PMID:Induction-independent recruitment of CREB-binding protein to the c-fos serum response element through interactions between the bromodomain and Elk-1. 1108 68
Serum response factor is a MADS box transcription factor that binds to consensus sequences CC(A/T)(6)GG found in the promoter region of several serum-inducible and muscle-specific genes. In skeletal myocytes
serum response factor
(
SRF
) has been shown to heterodimerize with the myogenic basic helix-loop-helix family of factors, related to MyoD, for control of muscle gene regulation. Here we report that
SRF
binds to another myogenic factor, TEF-1, that has been implicated in the regulation of a variety of cardiac muscle genes. By using different biochemical assays such as affinity precipitation of protein,
GST
-pulldown assay, and coimmunoprecipitation of proteins, we show that
SRF
binds to TEF-1 both in in vitro and in vivo assay conditions. A strong interaction of
SRF
with TEF-1 was seen even when one protein was denatured and immobilized on nitrocellulose membrane, indicating a direct and stable interaction between
SRF
and TEF-1, which occurs without a cofactor. This interaction is mediated through the C-terminal subdomain of MADS box of
SRF
encompassing amino acids 204-244 and the putative 2nd and 3rd alpha-helix/beta-sheet configuration of the TEA/ATTS DNA-binding domain of TEF-1. In the transient transfection assay, a positive cooperative effect of
SRF
and TEF-1 was observed when DNA-binding sites for both factors, serum response element and M-CAT respectively, were intact; mutation of either site abolished their synergistic effect. Similarly, an
SRF
mutant, SRFpm-1, defective in DNA binding failed to collaborate with TEF-1 for gene regulation, indicating that the synergistic trans-activation function of
SRF
and TEF-1 occurs via their binding to cognate DNA-binding sites. Our results demonstrate a novel association between
SRF
and TEF-1 for cardiac muscle gene regulation and disclose a general mechanism by which these two super families of factors are likely to control diversified biological functions.
...
PMID:Physical interaction between the MADS box of serum response factor and the TEA/ATTS DNA-binding domain of transcription enhancer factor-1. 1113 26
Many muscle-specific genes are regulated by transcriptional enhancer factor-1 (TEF-1),
serum response factor
(
SRF
), and myocyte enhancer factor-2 (MEF2) transcription factors. TEF-1 interacts with the MADS domain of
SRF
and together
SRF
and TEF-1 co-activate the skeletal alpha-actin promoter. MEF2 factors also contain a MADS domain with 50% amino acid identity to the
SRF
MADS domain. Because of this sequence divergence, some
SRF
co-factors do not interact with MEF2. To demonstrate that TEF-1 factors could also interact with MEF2 through its MADS domain, we used co-immunoprecipitation and
GST
pull-down assays in vitro and a mammalian two-hybrid assay in vivo. The MADS domain was not sufficient for MEF2 interaction with TEF-1, because additional sequences in the activation domains of both proteins were required for in vivo association. The physiological significance of this interaction was also demonstrated by transient transfection assays using muscle-specific promoters. Our results suggest that by their interaction with MEF2 factors, TEF-1 factors can control MEF2-dependent muscle-specific gene expression.
...
PMID:TEF-1 and MEF2 transcription factors interact to regulate muscle-specific promoters. 1206 76
1
2
Next >>