Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:2.5.1.18 (glutathione S-transferase)
 22,582 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

International scientific publications on the influence of metabolic genotypes on biological indicators of genotoxic risk in environmental or occupational exposure are reviewed. Biomarkers of exposure (substance or its metabolites in biological fluids, urinary mutagenicity, protein and DNA adducts) and of effects (chromosome aberrations (CAs), sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs), micronuclei (Mn), COMET assay, HPRT mutants) have been evaluated according to different genotypes (or phenotypes) of several activating/detoxifying metabolic activities. In less than half the studies (43 out of 95), the influence of genotype on the examined biological indicator was found, of which four report poorly reliable results (i.e., with scarce biological plausibility, because of the inconsistency of modulated effect with the type of enzymatic activity expressed). As regards urinary metabolites, the excretion of mercapturic acids (MA) is greater in subjects with high GST activity, that of 1-pyrenol and other PAH metabolites turns out to be significantly influenced by genotypes CYP1A1 or GSTM1 null, and that of exposure indicators to aromatic amines (AA) (acetylated and non-acetylated metabolites) is modulated by NAT2. In benzene exposure, preliminary results suggest an increase in urinary t, t-muconic acid (t,t-MA) in subjects with some genotypes. On urinary mutagenicity of PAH-exposed subjects, the effects of genotype GSTM1 null, alone or combined with NAT2 slow are reported. When DNA adduct levels are clearly increased in PAH-exposed group (18 out of 22), 7 out of 18 studies report the influence of GSTM1 null on this biomarker, and of the five studies which also examined genotype CYP1A1, four report the influence of genotype CYP1A1, alone or in combination with GSTM1 null. A total of 25 out of 41 publications (61%) evaluating the influence of metabolic polymorphisms on biomarkers of effect (cytogenetic markers, COMET assay, HPRT mutants) do not record any increase in the indicator due to exposure to the genotoxic agents studied, confirming the scarce sensitivity of these indicators (mainly HPRT mutants, Mn, COMET assay) for assessing environmental or occupational exposure to genotoxic substances. Concluding, in determining urinary metabolites for monitoring exposure to genotoxic substances, there is sufficient evidence that genetically-based metabolic polymorphisms must be taken into account in the future. The unfavourable association for the activating/detoxifying metabolism of PAH is also confirmed as a risk factor due to the formation of PAH-DNA adducts. The clearly protective role played by GSTT1 on DEB (and/or related compound)-induced sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) should be noted. The modulating effects of genotypes on protein adduct levels in environmental and occupational exposure have not yet been documented, and most studies on the influence of genotype on biological indicators of early genotoxic effects report negative results.
 ...
PMID:Biological indicators of genotoxic risk and metabolic polymorphisms. 1101 45

This paper reviews studies published in the international scientific literature evaluating the influence of genetically based metabolic polymorphisms on biological indicators of genotoxic risk in environmental or occupational exposure. Exposures due to life style (i.e. diet or smoking) were not considered. Indicators are subdivided into internal dose indicators (concentration of the substance or its metabolites in biological fluids, urinary mutagenicity, adducts of hemoglobin, plasma proteins and DNA), and early biological effects (chromosome aberrations, sister chromatid exchanges, micronuclei, COMET assay, HPRT mutants). The metabolic genotypes (or phenotypes) examined by various authors are: ALDH2 (aldehyde dehydrogenase), CYP (P450 cytochrome) 1AI, CYP1A2, CYP2E1, CYP2D6, EPHX (epoxidohydrolase), NAT2 (N-acetyl transferase), NQO1 (NAD(P)H: kinone oxidoreductase), PON1 (paraoxonase), GST (glutathione S-transferase) M1, GSTT1 and GSTP1. In more than half the studies (52 out of 96), no influence of genotype was found in the biological indicator. This may be due either to the poor sensitivity of the indicator used, or to low exposure. In studies examining the effect of genotype on the indicator, the biological plausibility of the result was evaluated, i.e., whether the effect is consistent with the type of enzymatic activity expressed. Four studies reported not very reliable results and suggest either the unfavourable influence of genotype GSTM1 with high detoxifying activity, or enzymatic activity poorly involved in the metabolism of the xenobiotics in question (NAT2 in the case of PAH). As regards urinary metabolites of genotoxic agents, eight studies reported the modulating effect of genotype. The urinary excretion of mercapturic acids was greater in subjects with high GST activity. In exposure to PAH, urinary 1-pyrenol and PAH metabolites turn out to be significantly influenced by genotypes CYP1A1 or GSTM1 null; in exposure to aromatic amines, the influence of NAT2 on exposure indicators (levels of acetylated and non-acetylated metabolites) was confirmed. Exposure to benzene led to an increase in t-t-MA in some genotypes, although experimental verification is still necessary. As regards urinary mutagenicity, the effect of genotype GSTM1 null is reported, and of the same genotype combined with NAT2 slow, in non-smoking individuals subjected to high exposure to PAH and in cigarette-smoking/coke-oven workers. Lastly, the determination of urinary metabolites in monitoring exposure to genotoxic substances, provides sufficient evidence that genetically based metabolic polymorphisms must be taken into account in the future. There is still little evidence regarding the importance of genotype on the level of protein adducts in environmental and occupational exposure. A relatively large number of publications (22) dealt with DNA adduct levels in PAH exposure. In 18 studies, the biological indicator clearly increases with respect to values in control subjects. Of these studies, seven reported the influence of GSTM1 null on DNA adducts and, of the five studies which also examined genotype CYP1A1, four reported the influence on DNA adduct level of genotype CYP1A1, alone or in combination with GSTM1 null. It therefore seems as if the unfavourable association for the activating/detoxifying metabolism of PAH is a risk factor for the formation of PAH-DNA adducts. Most publications (25 out of 41; 61%) dealing with metabolic polymorphisms in effect indicators (cytogenetic markers, COMET assay, HPRT mutants) did not report any increase in the indicator due to exposure to the genotoxic agents studied. These indicators of genotoxic damage, including mainly the frequency of HPRT mutants (100%), Mn (90%) and the COMET assay (67%), are not sufficiently sensitive in revealing exposure, confirming that they are not particularly suitable for measuring exposure to genotoxic substances in occupational or environmental exposures. It is therefore difficult to assess the influence of metabolic genotypes by means of this type of biological indicator. The few positive results reported for SCE in occupational studies mentioned the influence of genotype ALDH2, either alone or in combination with genotype CYP2E1 in exposure to CVM, or in combination with GSTM1 null in exposure to epichlorohydrin. For CA the results showed unfavourable combinations of genotypes CYP2E1, GSTM1 and PON1 in exposure to pesticides, and GSTM1 null in combination with NAT2 slow in exposure to urban air. All the remaining studies on the effect of genotype on biological indicators of cytogenetic damage reported negative results.
 ...
PMID:[Biomarkers of gentotoxic risk and metabolic polymorphism]. 1118 84

The influence of the genetic deletion polymorphism of glutathione S-transferase micro 1 (GSTM1 *0/*0) on levels of anti (+/-)-r-7,t-8-dihydroxy-t-9,10-oxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo[a]pyrene (anti-BPDE-DNA) adduct in the peripheral blood lymphocyte plus monocyte fraction (LMF) of coke-oven workers was investigated. A total of 95 male Polish coke-oven workers (60% current smokers) from two different plants comprised the sample population. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) exposure was assessed by means of the individual post-shift urinary excretion of 1-pyrenol (mean +/- S.D.: 6.93 +/- 7.20 micromol/mol creatinine; 70% of the subjects exceeded the proposed biological exposure index (BEI) 2.28 micromol/mol creatinine). Anti-BPDE-DNA adduct levels were detected by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)/fluorescence analysis of the anti-BPDE tetrol I-1 released after acid hydrolysis of DNA samples. Genotypes were determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on the genomic DNA of each subject. Coke-oven workers without active GSTM1 (GSTM1 *0/*0, 33%) had significantly higher adduct levels than those with active GSTM1 (GSTM1*1/*1 and *1/*0) (5.90 +/- 5.59 versus 3.25 +/- 2.01 adducts/10(8) bases, Mann-Whitney U-test, z = 2.53, P = 0.011), PAH exposure in the two subgroups being similar (7.06 +/- 6.83 versus 6.67 +/- 8.00 1-pyrenol micromol/mol creatinine). The highest number of GSTM1 null subjects (12/23, 39%) belonged to the quartile with the highest adduct levels (i.e., >4.67 adducts/10(8) nucleotides). That is, coke-oven workers with GSTM1 *0/*0 genotype had a significantly higher risk of having high adduct levels than individuals with active GSTM1 genotype (Fisher exact test P = 0.0355; odds ratio (OR) = 4.145, 95% CI 1.0-18.8). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the increase in anti-BPDE-DNA adduct levels in LMF was significantly related to the high occupational exposure to PAHs (benzo[a]pyrene (BaP)) of coke-oven workers (t = 3.087, P < 0.01) and to the lack of GSTM1 activity (t = 3.512, P < 0.001), rather than to the two other confounding factors of PAH intake, i.e. charcoal-broiled meat consumption and smoking habits. In conclusion, our results indicate the clear influence of the GSTM1 detoxifying genotype on anti-BPDE-DNA adduct formation in the LMF of coke-oven workers. This is invaluable for future environmental-occupational studies using this biomarker of PAH exposure.
 ...
PMID:GSTM1 null genotype as a risk factor for anti-BPDE-DNA adduct formation in mononuclear white blood cells of coke-oven workers. 1503 19

It is important to identify the potential genetic-susceptible factors that are able to modulate individual responses to exposure to carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). In the present study we evaluated the influence of four polymorphisms of nucleotide excision repair (NER) genes [xeroderma pigmentosum-C (XPC)-PAT +/-, xeroderma pigmentosum-A (XPA) 5' non-coding region-A23G, XPD-exon 23 A35931C Lys751Gln, xeroderma pigmentosum-D (XPD)-exon 10 G23591A Asp312Asn] and that of glutathione S-transferase mu1 (GSTM1-active or -null) on benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide (B[a]PDE)-DNA adduct levels from the lympho-monocyte fraction (LMF) of highly PAH benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P)-exposed Polish coke oven workers (n = 67, 67% current smokers) with individual urinary post-shift excretion of 1-pyrenol exceeding the proposed biological exposure index (BEI) (2.28 micromol/mol creatinine). The bulky (+/-)-r-7,t-8-dihydroxy-t-9,10-oxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo[a]pyrene (anti-B[a]PDE)-DNA adduct levels were detected by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)/fluorescence analysis and genotypes by polymerase chain reaction. We found that workers with the low DNA repair capacity of XPC-PAT+/+ and XPA-A23A genotypes had significantly increased anti-B[a]PDE-DNA adduct levels (Mann-Whitney U-test, z = 2.24, P = 0.02 and z = 2.65, P = 0.01). Moreover, DNA adducts were also raised in workers without GSTM1 activity (GSTM1-null genotype) (Mann-Whitney U-test, z = 2.25, P = 0.0246). Workers with unfavourable XPC-PAT+/+ and XPA-A23A NER genotypes, alone (approximately 65% of workers) or combined with GSTM1-null genotype (approximately 75% of workers) were in the tertile with the highest adduct level, i.e. >4.11 adducts/10(8) nt (chi2 = 5.85, P = 0.0156 and chi2 = 5.40, P = 0.01). The increase in anti-B[a]PDE-DNA adduct levels (ln values) was significantly related in a multiple linear regression analysis to PAH exposure (i.e. urinary post-shift excretion of 1-pyrenol) (t = 2.61, P = 0.0115), lack of GSTM1 activity (t = 2.41, P = 0.0192) and to low DNA repair capacity of the XPC-PAT+/+ genotype (t = 2.34, P = 0.0226). The influence of the XPA-A23A genotype was not evident in this statistical analysis, and no associations with XPD polymorphisms, dietary habits or tobacco smoking were found. The modulation of anti-B[a]PDE-DNA adducts in the LMF by GSTM1-null and some low-activity NER genotypes may be considered as a potential genetic susceptibility factor capable of modulating individual responses to PAH (B[a]P) genotoxic exposure and the consequent risk of cancer in coke oven workers.
 ...
PMID:Reduced nucleotide excision repair and GSTM1-null genotypes influence anti-B[a]PDE-DNA adduct levels in mononuclear white blood cells of highly PAH-exposed coke oven workers. 1547 94