Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:2.4.2.8 (hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase)
 2,527 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Fluoranthene (FA) was studied with respect to possible mechanisms of its high mutagenicity but low carcinogenicity, in comparison with the corresponding properties of benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), and with regard to the synergism of these two compounds shown by van Duuren and Goldschmidt (J Natl Cancer Inst 56, 1976, 1237). FA and BaP activated by S9 from Aroclor 1254 (PCB)-treated rats induce HPRT mutations in CHO cells with about equal effectiveness at the same exposure doses, which also lead to the same frequencies of repairable DNA adducts, enzyme-induced strand breaks being used as an indirect measure of adducts to DNA. FA was also shown to be an efficient inducer of SCE in human peripheral lymphocytes cocultivated with PCB-treated HepG2 cells or with liver cells from PCB-pretreated rats. For the induction of SCE, FA and BaP were shown to act additively. From metabolic studies with liver microsomes from C57Bl/6 mice it is concluded that, whereas BaP induces the metabolism of BaP to the mutagenic epoxide, neither BaP nor FA is able to induce the metabolism of FA. In mutation experiments with V79 cells (XEM2) constitutive for P450 IA1 activity, BaP 7,8-diol but not FA 2,3-diol provokes a high frequency of HPRT mutations. In cells constitutive for P450 IA2 enzymatic activity FA and BaP are but weakly mutagenic and practically nonmutagenic, respectively. Due to the additivity of the genotoxic effects of FA and BaP, induction of an error-prone condition by the latter compound seems to be excluded.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:On the bioactivation and genotoxic action of fluoranthene. 146 88

Preventable environmental causes of cancer, including tobacco smoke and other carcinogens in the diet, workplace, and ambient environment are responsible for the vast majority of human cancers. This paper reviews recent molecular epidemiologic studies that have focused on environmental carcinogenesis and environment-host interactions. Biomarkers such as carcinogen-DNA and carcinogen-protein adducts, mutations in reporter or target genes (e.g., HPRT, GPA, ras, p53), or genetic or acquired susceptibility factors (e.g., polymorphisms in the P450 or glutathione-S-transferase genes and serum levels of antioxidants) have shown significant potential in prevention. They should be useful in early identification of at risk individuals and in designing and monitoring interventions (smoking cessation, exposure reduction, and chemoprevention).
 ...
PMID:Molecular epidemiology and prevention of cancer. 874 89

This paper reviews studies published in the international scientific literature evaluating the influence of genetically based metabolic polymorphisms on biological indicators of genotoxic risk in environmental or occupational exposure. Exposures due to life style (i.e. diet or smoking) were not considered. Indicators are subdivided into internal dose indicators (concentration of the substance or its metabolites in biological fluids, urinary mutagenicity, adducts of hemoglobin, plasma proteins and DNA), and early biological effects (chromosome aberrations, sister chromatid exchanges, micronuclei, COMET assay, HPRT mutants). The metabolic genotypes (or phenotypes) examined by various authors are: ALDH2 (aldehyde dehydrogenase), CYP (P450 cytochrome) 1AI, CYP1A2, CYP2E1, CYP2D6, EPHX (epoxidohydrolase), NAT2 (N-acetyl transferase), NQO1 (NAD(P)H: kinone oxidoreductase), PON1 (paraoxonase), GST (glutathione S-transferase) M1, GSTT1 and GSTP1. In more than half the studies (52 out of 96), no influence of genotype was found in the biological indicator. This may be due either to the poor sensitivity of the indicator used, or to low exposure. In studies examining the effect of genotype on the indicator, the biological plausibility of the result was evaluated, i.e., whether the effect is consistent with the type of enzymatic activity expressed. Four studies reported not very reliable results and suggest either the unfavourable influence of genotype GSTM1 with high detoxifying activity, or enzymatic activity poorly involved in the metabolism of the xenobiotics in question (NAT2 in the case of PAH). As regards urinary metabolites of genotoxic agents, eight studies reported the modulating effect of genotype. The urinary excretion of mercapturic acids was greater in subjects with high GST activity. In exposure to PAH, urinary 1-pyrenol and PAH metabolites turn out to be significantly influenced by genotypes CYP1A1 or GSTM1 null; in exposure to aromatic amines, the influence of NAT2 on exposure indicators (levels of acetylated and non-acetylated metabolites) was confirmed. Exposure to benzene led to an increase in t-t-MA in some genotypes, although experimental verification is still necessary. As regards urinary mutagenicity, the effect of genotype GSTM1 null is reported, and of the same genotype combined with NAT2 slow, in non-smoking individuals subjected to high exposure to PAH and in cigarette-smoking/coke-oven workers. Lastly, the determination of urinary metabolites in monitoring exposure to genotoxic substances, provides sufficient evidence that genetically based metabolic polymorphisms must be taken into account in the future. There is still little evidence regarding the importance of genotype on the level of protein adducts in environmental and occupational exposure. A relatively large number of publications (22) dealt with DNA adduct levels in PAH exposure. In 18 studies, the biological indicator clearly increases with respect to values in control subjects. Of these studies, seven reported the influence of GSTM1 null on DNA adducts and, of the five studies which also examined genotype CYP1A1, four reported the influence on DNA adduct level of genotype CYP1A1, alone or in combination with GSTM1 null. It therefore seems as if the unfavourable association for the activating/detoxifying metabolism of PAH is a risk factor for the formation of PAH-DNA adducts. Most publications (25 out of 41; 61%) dealing with metabolic polymorphisms in effect indicators (cytogenetic markers, COMET assay, HPRT mutants) did not report any increase in the indicator due to exposure to the genotoxic agents studied. These indicators of genotoxic damage, including mainly the frequency of HPRT mutants (100%), Mn (90%) and the COMET assay (67%), are not sufficiently sensitive in revealing exposure, confirming that they are not particularly suitable for measuring exposure to genotoxic substances in occupational or environmental exposures. It is therefore difficult to assess the influence of metabolic genotypes by means of this type of biological indicator. The few positive results reported for SCE in occupational studies mentioned the influence of genotype ALDH2, either alone or in combination with genotype CYP2E1 in exposure to CVM, or in combination with GSTM1 null in exposure to epichlorohydrin. For CA the results showed unfavourable combinations of genotypes CYP2E1, GSTM1 and PON1 in exposure to pesticides, and GSTM1 null in combination with NAT2 slow in exposure to urban air. All the remaining studies on the effect of genotype on biological indicators of cytogenetic damage reported negative results.
 ...
PMID:[Biomarkers of gentotoxic risk and metabolic polymorphism]. 1118 84

Several alkylanilines with structures more complex than toluidines have been associated epidemiologically with human cancer. Their mechanism of action remains largely undetermined, and there is no reported evidence that it replicates that of multicyclic aromatic amines even though the principal metabolic pathways of P450-mediated hydroxylation and phase II conjugation are very similar. As a means to elucidate their mechanisms of action, lethality and mutagenicity in the adenine phosphoribosyltransferase (aprt (+/-)) gene induced in several Chinese hamster ovary cell types by 2,6- and 3,5-dimethylaniline (2,6-DMA, 3,5-DMA) and their N- and ring-hydroxyl derivatives (N-OH-2,6-DMA, N-OH-3,5-DMA, 2,6-DMAP, 3,5-DMAP) were assessed. Dose-response relationships were determined in the parental AA8 cell line, its repair-deficient UV5 subclone and other repair-deficient 5P3NAT2 or -proficient 5P3NAT2R9 subclones engineered to express mouse cytochrome P4501A2 (CYP1A2) and human N-acetyltransferase (NAT2), and also in AS52 cells harboring the bacterial guanine-hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (gpt) gene. Mutations in the gpt gene of AS52 cells were characterized and found to be dominated by G:C to A:T and A:T to G:C transitions. Separately, treatment of AS52 cells with N-OH-2,6-DMA, N-OH-3,5-DMA, 2,6-DMAP, 3,5-DMAP, and 3,5-DMAP led to intracellular production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) for at least 24h after removal of the mutagens in every case. Using the comet assay, DNA strand breaks were observed in a dose-dependent manner in AS52 cells when treated with each of the four N-OH-2,6-DMA, N-OH-3,5-DMA, 2,6-DMAP, and 3,5-DMAP derivatives. Comparative evaluation of the results indicates that the principal mechanism of mutagenic action is likely to be through redox cycling of intracellularly bound aminophenol/quinone imine structures to generate ROS rather than through formation of covalent DNA adducts.
 ...
PMID:Genotoxicity of 2,6- and 3,5-dimethylaniline in cultured mammalian cells: the role of reactive oxygen species. 2283 70

UVB and UVC toxicity was detected in Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cell lines AA8, UV5 and XEM2 (a V79-derived cell line expressing rat P450 1A1). Unlike FICZ-HPLC assay that showed induction of CYP1A1 enzyme activity after 20 minutes and 2 hour UVC exposure, the EROD assay showed no difference in cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) activity after exposure to different doses of UVB and UVC light. Different cytotoxic and mutagenic effect of photo lesions induced by UVC and UVB light was investigated with the DRAG and HPRT assays, comparing the wild type cell line AA8 and the Nucleotide Excision Repair (NER) deficient cell line UV5. DRAG assay showed a significant difference in UV induced cytotoxicity between UVC and UVB reflecting the larger energy and toxic effect of UVC along with significant difference in UV induced toxicity between AA8 and UV5 cell lines. This was further validated through the HPRT assay, which also showed a significant difference in UVC (5 J/m(2)) induced mutagenic effect between these cell lines. In addition, HPRT assay showed the mutagenic effect of photosensitizer, acetophenone. These results show that UVB and UVC generate serious damage through photo products on DNA, and might induce the metabolic activity of CYP1A1.
 ...
PMID:Cellular and genomic toxicity produced by UV light in Chinese hamster ovary cells. 2457 18