Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:2.4.2.8 (hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase)
 2,527 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

International scientific publications on the influence of metabolic genotypes on biological indicators of genotoxic risk in environmental or occupational exposure are reviewed. Biomarkers of exposure (substance or its metabolites in biological fluids, urinary mutagenicity, protein and DNA adducts) and of effects (chromosome aberrations (CAs), sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs), micronuclei (Mn), COMET assay, HPRT mutants) have been evaluated according to different genotypes (or phenotypes) of several activating/detoxifying metabolic activities. In less than half the studies (43 out of 95), the influence of genotype on the examined biological indicator was found, of which four report poorly reliable results (i.e., with scarce biological plausibility, because of the inconsistency of modulated effect with the type of enzymatic activity expressed). As regards urinary metabolites, the excretion of mercapturic acids (MA) is greater in subjects with high GST activity, that of 1-pyrenol and other PAH metabolites turns out to be significantly influenced by genotypes CYP1A1 or GSTM1 null, and that of exposure indicators to aromatic amines (AA) (acetylated and non-acetylated metabolites) is modulated by NAT2. In benzene exposure, preliminary results suggest an increase in urinary t, t-muconic acid (t,t-MA) in subjects with some genotypes. On urinary mutagenicity of PAH-exposed subjects, the effects of genotype GSTM1 null, alone or combined with NAT2 slow are reported. When DNA adduct levels are clearly increased in PAH-exposed group (18 out of 22), 7 out of 18 studies report the influence of GSTM1 null on this biomarker, and of the five studies which also examined genotype CYP1A1, four report the influence of genotype CYP1A1, alone or in combination with GSTM1 null. A total of 25 out of 41 publications (61%) evaluating the influence of metabolic polymorphisms on biomarkers of effect (cytogenetic markers, COMET assay, HPRT mutants) do not record any increase in the indicator due to exposure to the genotoxic agents studied, confirming the scarce sensitivity of these indicators (mainly HPRT mutants, Mn, COMET assay) for assessing environmental or occupational exposure to genotoxic substances. Concluding, in determining urinary metabolites for monitoring exposure to genotoxic substances, there is sufficient evidence that genetically-based metabolic polymorphisms must be taken into account in the future. The unfavourable association for the activating/detoxifying metabolism of PAH is also confirmed as a risk factor due to the formation of PAH-DNA adducts. The clearly protective role played by GSTT1 on DEB (and/or related compound)-induced sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) should be noted. The modulating effects of genotypes on protein adduct levels in environmental and occupational exposure have not yet been documented, and most studies on the influence of genotype on biological indicators of early genotoxic effects report negative results.
 ...
PMID:Biological indicators of genotoxic risk and metabolic polymorphisms. 1101 45

This paper reviews studies published in the international scientific literature evaluating the influence of genetically based metabolic polymorphisms on biological indicators of genotoxic risk in environmental or occupational exposure. Exposures due to life style (i.e. diet or smoking) were not considered. Indicators are subdivided into internal dose indicators (concentration of the substance or its metabolites in biological fluids, urinary mutagenicity, adducts of hemoglobin, plasma proteins and DNA), and early biological effects (chromosome aberrations, sister chromatid exchanges, micronuclei, COMET assay, HPRT mutants). The metabolic genotypes (or phenotypes) examined by various authors are: ALDH2 (aldehyde dehydrogenase), CYP (P450 cytochrome) 1AI, CYP1A2, CYP2E1, CYP2D6, EPHX (epoxidohydrolase), NAT2 (N-acetyl transferase), NQO1 (NAD(P)H: kinone oxidoreductase), PON1 (paraoxonase), GST (glutathione S-transferase) M1, GSTT1 and GSTP1. In more than half the studies (52 out of 96), no influence of genotype was found in the biological indicator. This may be due either to the poor sensitivity of the indicator used, or to low exposure. In studies examining the effect of genotype on the indicator, the biological plausibility of the result was evaluated, i.e., whether the effect is consistent with the type of enzymatic activity expressed. Four studies reported not very reliable results and suggest either the unfavourable influence of genotype GSTM1 with high detoxifying activity, or enzymatic activity poorly involved in the metabolism of the xenobiotics in question (NAT2 in the case of PAH). As regards urinary metabolites of genotoxic agents, eight studies reported the modulating effect of genotype. The urinary excretion of mercapturic acids was greater in subjects with high GST activity. In exposure to PAH, urinary 1-pyrenol and PAH metabolites turn out to be significantly influenced by genotypes CYP1A1 or GSTM1 null; in exposure to aromatic amines, the influence of NAT2 on exposure indicators (levels of acetylated and non-acetylated metabolites) was confirmed. Exposure to benzene led to an increase in t-t-MA in some genotypes, although experimental verification is still necessary. As regards urinary mutagenicity, the effect of genotype GSTM1 null is reported, and of the same genotype combined with NAT2 slow, in non-smoking individuals subjected to high exposure to PAH and in cigarette-smoking/coke-oven workers. Lastly, the determination of urinary metabolites in monitoring exposure to genotoxic substances, provides sufficient evidence that genetically based metabolic polymorphisms must be taken into account in the future. There is still little evidence regarding the importance of genotype on the level of protein adducts in environmental and occupational exposure. A relatively large number of publications (22) dealt with DNA adduct levels in PAH exposure. In 18 studies, the biological indicator clearly increases with respect to values in control subjects. Of these studies, seven reported the influence of GSTM1 null on DNA adducts and, of the five studies which also examined genotype CYP1A1, four reported the influence on DNA adduct level of genotype CYP1A1, alone or in combination with GSTM1 null. It therefore seems as if the unfavourable association for the activating/detoxifying metabolism of PAH is a risk factor for the formation of PAH-DNA adducts. Most publications (25 out of 41; 61%) dealing with metabolic polymorphisms in effect indicators (cytogenetic markers, COMET assay, HPRT mutants) did not report any increase in the indicator due to exposure to the genotoxic agents studied. These indicators of genotoxic damage, including mainly the frequency of HPRT mutants (100%), Mn (90%) and the COMET assay (67%), are not sufficiently sensitive in revealing exposure, confirming that they are not particularly suitable for measuring exposure to genotoxic substances in occupational or environmental exposures. It is therefore difficult to assess the influence of metabolic genotypes by means of this type of biological indicator. The few positive results reported for SCE in occupational studies mentioned the influence of genotype ALDH2, either alone or in combination with genotype CYP2E1 in exposure to CVM, or in combination with GSTM1 null in exposure to epichlorohydrin. For CA the results showed unfavourable combinations of genotypes CYP2E1, GSTM1 and PON1 in exposure to pesticides, and GSTM1 null in combination with NAT2 slow in exposure to urban air. All the remaining studies on the effect of genotype on biological indicators of cytogenetic damage reported negative results.
 ...
PMID:[Biomarkers of gentotoxic risk and metabolic polymorphism]. 1118 84

The overall objective of this study was to evaluate a continuum of biomarkers in blood and urine for their sensitivities as indicators of low level occupational exposures to 1,3 butadiene (BD). The study design was largely cross-sectional, with biological samples collected within a short timeframe. Personal 8-h BD exposure measures were made on several occasions over a 60-day period for each potentially exposed worker in order provide maximum accuracy for this independent variable and to accommodate the different expression intervals of the several biomarkers. Co-exposures to styrene, toluene and benzene were also measured. The study included 24 BD monomer production workers (mean BD exposure=0.642 mg/m(3)), 34 polymerization workers (mean BD exposure=1.794 mg/m(3)) and 25 controls (mean BD exposure=0.023 mg/m(3)). The several biomarkers were measured by a consortium of investigators at different locations in the US and Europe. These biomarkers included: (1) metabolic genotypes (CYP2E1, EH, GST M1, GST T1, ADH2, ADH3), determined in Prague and Burlington, VT; (2) urinary M1 and M2 metabolites (1,2-dihydroxy-4-[N-acetylcysteinyl]-butane and 1-hydroxy-2-[N-acetylcysteinyl]-3-butene, respectively), determined in Albuquerque, NM and Leiden; (3) hemoglobin adducts (N-[2-dihydroxy-3-butenyl]valine=HBVal and N-[2,3,4-trihydroxybutyl]valine=THBVal), determined in Amsterdam and Chapel Hill, NC, respectively; (4) HPRT mutations determined by autoradiographic assay in Galveston, TX, with slides re-read in Burlington, VT; (6) hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) mutations determined by cloning assay in Leiden with mutational spectra characterized in Burlington, VT; (7) sister chromatid exchanges and chromosome aberrations determined by standard methods and FISH analysis in Prague. Urinary M1 and M2 metabolites and HBVal and THBVal hemoglobin adducts were all significantly correlated with BD exposure levels, with adducts being the most highly associated. No significant relationships were observed between BD exposures and HPRT mutations or any of the cytogenetic endpoints, regardless of method of assay.
 ...
PMID:Biomarkers for assessing occupational exposures to 1,3-butadiene. 1139 5

In order to cast light on carcinogen-specific molecular mechanisms underlying experimental hepatocarcinogenesis in rats, in vivo mutagenicity and mutation spectra of known genotoxic rat hepatocarcinogens N-nitrosopyrrolidine (NPYR), and 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (IQ), as well as the nongenotoxic hepatocarcinogen di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) and the noncarcinogen acetaminophen (AAP), were investigated in guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (gpt) delta transgenic rats, a recently developed animal model for genotoxicity analysis. After 13-wk treatment, glutathione S-transferase placental form (GST-P)-positive liver cell foci were significantly increased in NPYR-treated and IQ-treated rats. In the DEHP-treated rats, marked hepatomegaly with centrilobular hypertrophy of hepatocytes occurred, although GST-P staining was consistently negative. Positive mutagenicity was detected in IQ- and NPYR-treated rats. Mutant frequencies (MFs) in the liver DNA were 188.0 x 10(-6) and 56.5 x 10(-6), approximately 35-fold and 10-fold higher, respectively, than that of nontreatment control rats (5.5 x 10(-6)). There were no increases in MFs in the DEHP- or AAP-treated rats as compared to the nontreatment control value. IQ induced mainly base substitutions leading to G:C to T:A transversions (56.9%) and deletions of G:C base pairs. In contrast, NPYR primarily caused specific A:T to G:C transitions (49.3%), which are very rare in the other groups. These data provided support for the conclusion that IQ and NPYR hepatocarcinogenesis depends on genotoxic processes and specific DNA adduct formation while DEHP exerts its influence via a nongenotoxic promotional pathway. Our data also indicate that analysis of specific in vivo mutational responses with transgenic animal models can provide crucial information for understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying chemical carcinogenesis.
 ...
PMID:In vivo mutational analysis of liver DNA in gpt delta transgenic rats treated with the hepatocarcinogens N-nitrosopyrrolidine, 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline, and di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate. 1548 47

Results of a recent molecular epidemiological study of 1,3-butadiene (BD) exposed Czech workers, conducted to compare female to male responses, have confirmed and extended the findings of a previously reported males only study (HEI Research Report 116, 2003). The initial study found that urine concentrations of the metabolites 1,2-dihydroxy-4-(acetyl) butane (M1) and 1-dihydroxy-2-(N-acetylcysteinyl)-3-butene (M2) and blood concentrations of the hemoglobin adducts N-[2-hydroxy-3-butenyl] valine (HB-Val) and N-[2,3,4-trihydroxy-butyl] valine (THB-Val) constitute excellent biomarkers of exposure, both being highly correlated with BD exposure levels, and that GST genotypes modulate at least one metabolic pathway, but that irreversible genotoxic effects such as chromosome aberrations and HPRT gene mutations are neither associated with BD exposure levels nor with worker genotypes (GST [glutathione-S-transferase]-M1, GSTT1, CYP2E1 (5' promoter), CYP2E1 (intron 6), EH [epoxide hydrolase] 113, EH139, ADH [alcohol dehydrogenase]2 and ADH3). The no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for chromosome aberrations and HPRT mutations was 1.794 mg/m(3) (0.812 ppm)--the mean exposure level for the highest exposed worker group in this initial study. The second Czech study, reported here, initiated in 2003, included 26 female control workers, 23 female BD exposed workers, 25 male control workers and 30 male BD exposed workers (some repeats from the first study). Multiple external exposure measurements (10 full 8-h shift measures by personal monitoring per worker) over a 4-month period before biological sample collections showed that BD workplace levels were lower than in the first study. Mean 8-h TWA exposure levels were 0.008 mg/m(3) (0.0035 ppm) and 0.397 mg/m(3) (0.180 ppm) for female controls and exposed, respectively, but with individual single 8-h TWA values up to 9.793 mg/m(3) (4.45 ppm) in the exposed group. Mean male 8-h TWA exposure levels were 0.007 mg/m(3) (0.0032 ppm) and 0.808 mg/m(3) (0.370 ppm) for controls and exposed, respectively; however, the individual single 8-h TWA values up to 12.583 mg/m(3) (5.72 ppm) in the exposed group. While the urine metabolite concentrations for both M1 and M2 were elevated in exposed compared to control females, the differences were not significant, possibly due to the relatively low BD exposure levels. For males, with greater BD exposures, the concentrations of both metabolites were significantly elevated in urine from exposed compared to control workers. As in the first study, urine metabolite excretion patterns in both sexes revealed conjugation to be the minor detoxification pathway (yielding the M2 metabolite) but both M1 and M2 concentration values were lower in males in this second study compared to their concentrations in the first, reflecting the lower external exposures of males in this second study compared to the first. Of note, females showed lower concentrations of both M1 and M2 metabolites in the urine per unit of BD exposure than did males while exhibiting the same M1/(M1+M2) ratio, reflecting the same relative utilization of the hydrolytic (producing M1) and the conjugation (producing M2) detoxification pathways as males. Assays for the N,N-(2,3-dihydroxy-1,4-butadyl) valine (pyr-Val) hemoglobin (Hb) adduct, which is specific for the highly genotoxic 1,2,3,4-diepoxybutane (DEB) metabolite of BD, have been conducted on blood samples from all participants in this second Czech study. Any adduct that may have been present was below the limits of quantitation (LOQ) for this assay for all samples, indicating that production of this important BD metabolite in humans is below levels produced in both mice and rats exposed to as little as 1.0 ppm BD by inhalation (J.A. Swenberg, M.G. Bird, R.J. Lewis, Future directions in butadiene risk assessment, Chem. Biol. Int. (2006), this issue). Results of assays for the HB-Val and THB-Val hemoglobin adducts are pending. HPRT mutations, determined by cloning assays, and multiple measures of chromosome level changes (sister-chromatid exchanges [SCE], aberrations determined by conventional methods and FISH) again showed no associations with BD exposures, confirming the findings of the initial study that these irreversible genotoxic changes do not arise in humans occupationally exposed to low levels of BD. Except for lower production of both urine metabolites in females, no female-male differences in response to BD exposures were detected in this study. As in the initial study, there were no significant genotype associations with the irreversible genotoxic endpoints. However, as in the first, differences in the metabolic detoxification of BD as reflected in relative amounts of the M1 and M2 urinary metabolites were associated with genotypes, this time both GST and EH.
 ...
PMID:Molecular epidemiological studies in 1,3-butadiene exposed Czech workers: female-male comparisons. 1694 64