Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:2.4.2.7 (adenine phosphoribosyltransferase)
 692 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The fragile site, FRA16B, at 16q22.100 and four different translocations with breakpoints at 16q22.102, 16q22.105, 16q22.108, and 16q22.3 were used to locate and order DNA probes. This was achieved by Southern analysis of a somatic cell hybrid panel containing portions of chromosome 16 and by in situ hybridization. The anonymous DNA fragments D16S6, D16S10, and D16S11 were proximal to FRA16B and located at 16q13----q22.100. D16S4 and LCAT were located at 16q22.100----q22.102. TAT and HP were located at 16q22.105----q22.108. CTRB was located distal to 16q22.105 and therefore is in the distal half of 16q22. The order of markers in this region was determined as centromere-D16S6, D16S11, D16S10, MT-FRA16B-D16S4, LCAT-HP,TAT,CTRB-APRT- telomere. Linkage studies to determine map distances between the closest markers flanking the fragile site are now in progress.
 ...
PMID:Fine mapping of gene probes and anonymous DNA fragments to the long arm of chromosome 16. 290 Aug 8

Relative-rate tests may be used to compare substitution rates between more than two sequences, which yields two main questions: What influence does the number of sequences have on relative-rate tests and what is the influence of the sampling strategy as characterized by the phylogenetic relationships between sequences? Using both simulations and analysis of real data from murids (APRT and LCAT nuclear genes), we show that comparing large numbers of species significantly improves the power of the test. This effect is stronger if species are more distantly related. On the other hand, it appears to be less rewarding to increase outgroup sampling than to use the single nearest outgroup sequence. Rates may be compared between paraphyletic ingroups and using paraphyletic outgroups, but unbalanced taxonomic sampling can bias the test. We present a simple phylogenetic weighting scheme which takes taxonomic sampling into account and significantly improves the relative-rate test in cases of unbalanced sampling. The answers are thus: (1) large taxonomic sampling of compared groups improves relative-rate tests, (2) sampling many outgroups does not bring significant improvement, (3) the only constraint on sampling strategy is that the outgroup be valid, and (4) results are more accurate when phylogenetic relationships between the investigated sequences are taken into account. Given current limitations of the maximum-likelihood and nonparametric approaches, the relative-rate test generalized to any number of species with phylogenetic weighting appears to be the most general test available to compare rates between lineages.
 ...
PMID:Sensitivity of the relative-rate test to taxonomic sampling. 972 73