Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:2.4.2.30 (PARP)
 13,611 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The virally encoded proteases from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and avian myeloblastosis virus (AMV) have been compared relative to their ability to hydrolyze a variant of the three-domain Pseudomonas exotoxin, PE66. This exotoxin derivative, missing domain I and referred to as LysPE40, is made up of a 13-kilodalton NH2-terminal translocation domain II connected by a segment of 40 amino acids to enzyme domain III of the toxin, a 23-kilodalton ADP-ribosyltransferase. HIV protease hydrolyzes two peptide bonds in LysPE40, a Leu-Leu bond in the interdomain region and a Leu-Ala bond in a nonstructured region three residues in from the NH2-terminus. Neither of these sites is cleaved by the AMV enzyme; hydrolysis occurs, instead, at an Asp-Val bond in another part of the interdomain segment and at a Leu-Thr bond in the NH2-terminal region of domain II. Synthetic peptides corresponding to these cleavage sites are hydrolyzed by the individual proteases with the same specificity displayed toward the protein substrate. Peptide substrates for one protease are neither substrates nor competitive inhibitors for the other. A potent inhibitor of HIV type 1 protease was more than 3 orders of magnitude less active toward the AMV enzyme. These results suggest that although the crystallographic models of Rous sarcoma virus protease (an enzyme nearly identical to the AMV enzyme) and HIV type 1 protease show a high degree of similarity, there exist structural differences between these retroviral proteases that are clearly reflected by their kinetic properties.
 ...
PMID:Proteases from human immunodeficiency virus and avian myeloblastosis virus show distinct specificities in hydrolysis of multidomain protein substrates. 216 35

Adenoviral (ADV) gene therapy with the thymidine kinase gene (TK) under control of the Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) promotor followed by the administration of acyclovir leads to replication errors in transcription and to cell death. This concept of ADV-RSV-TK has been established for the treatment of ovarian cancer cells. The purpose of this investigation was to clarify whether cell death after ADV-RSV-TK gene therapy and acyclovir administration is indeed due to apoptosis induction, whether the synergistic effect of ADV-RSV-TK gene therapy with chemotherapy was limited to the primary mechanism of action or whether the vector transduction itself exerted any pro-apoptotic effect was examined using the epithelial cell lines OVCAR-3 and MDAH-2774, established from human poorly differentiated serous ovarian cancer. Fluorimetric assay of caspase-3 activity was performed, as well as ELISA of the CK 18 split product M30. PARP cleavage was analysed by Western blotting. Apoptosis induction was established in this investigation as the mechanism of the ADV-RSV-TK gene therapy effect of acyclovir administration by caspase activity and subsequent CK 18 cleavage. Neither acyclovir nor vector administration alone showed any apoptotic activity. The synergistic effect of TK gene therapy and chemotherapeutic agents was shown to be TK induced. Significant anti-PARP 1 activity was found to be an ADV-RSV-TK treatment effect after acyclovir addition.
 ...
PMID:Adenovirus-mediated thymidine kinase gene therapy induces apoptosis in human epithelial ovarian cancer cells and damages PARP-1. 1936 28