Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:2.3.1.28 (chloramphenicol acetyltransferase)
 5,100 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

We used a recombinant plasmid containing an adeno-associated virus (AAV) genome to construct several vectors which express the gene for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT). We transfected four different AAV-CAT vectors into human 293 (adenovirus-transformed) cells and analyzed CAT activity. We show that, for vectors using the AAV p40 and p19 promoter, the chimeric AAV-CAT transcripts began from the correct 5' position but the basal level of CAT expression depended in part on the structure of the transcript. We also examined the effects of coinfection of the cells with the helper adenovirus or cotransfection with a plasmid which expressed the adenovirus translational control RNA, VA1 RNA. Cotransfection with plasmids containing the gene for VA1 RNA resulted in elevated levels of CAT activity. VA1 RNA stimulated translation of the chimeric mRNA. However, in two cases, the VA1 RNA apparently decreased the level of mRNA. These results suggest that in addition to its function in translation, VA1 RNA acts at a second site to alter cytoplasmic accumulation of some mRNAs. Infection with adenovirus increased CAT activity several-fold by increasing the cytoplasmic levels of the chimeric AAV-CAT transcript. When the CAT gene is inserted down stream of the AAV intron, adenovirus and not VA1 RNA alone increased CAT activity by promoting accumulation of a spliced transcript.
 ...
PMID:Gene expression in adeno-associated virus vectors: the effects of chimeric mRNA structure, helper virus, and adenovirus VA1 RNA. 282 Jan 38

We used rep+ and rep- recombinant AAV-plasmid vectors containing the nonselectable marker chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) driven by the AAV p40 promoter, and having a selectable marker, neo, inserted in the plasmid genome, and driven by a herpesvirus thymidine kinase gene promoter. Each vector was transfected into human 293 cells or HeLa cells and the neo gene was used to select geneticin-resistant (genr) cells containing integrated vectors. The genr cells were then screened for expression of the unselected marker CAT. For 293 cells, most clones from the rep- vector gave high CAT expression whereas only 50% of those from the rep+ vector expressed CAT, generally at low level. For HeLa cells about 25% of the clones derived from either the rep+ or rep- vector expressed CAT, and several clones from the rep+ vector gave very high yields. We also analyzed integrated rep+ vectors by rescue after superinfection with adenovirus and by Southern blotting. The AAV-CAT genome could be rescued from 50% of HeLa cell clones but not from 293 cell clones. Lack of rescuability reflected rearrangement of the AAV genome termini or the rep gene. Western blotting showed low level constitutive expression of rep protein in one 293 cell clone and two HeLa cell clones. Thus, the AAV p40 promoter (as well as p5 and p19) can function in integrated vectors to express unselected markers which can subsequently be rescued. Expression and rescue depended upon several parameters including the cell type, the initial structure of the vector (rep+ or rep-) but not continued expression of rep, and possibly global effects of the surrounding chromatin.
 ...
PMID:Expression and rescue of a nonselected marker from an integrated AAV vector. 284 41

We have used the defective human parvovirus adeno-associated virus (AAV) as a novel eucaryotic vector (parvector) for the expression of a foreign gene in human cells. The recombinant, pAV2, contains the AAV genome in a pBR322-derived bacterial plasmid. When pAV2 is transfected into human cells together with helper adenovirus particles, the AAV genome is rescued from the recombinant plasmid and replicated to produce infectious AAV particles at high efficiency. To create a vector, we inserted a procaryotic sequence coding for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) into derivatives of pAV2 following either of the AAV promoters p40 (pAVHiCAT) and p19 (pAVBcCAT). When transfected into human 293 cells or HeLa cells, pAVHiCAT expressed CAT activity in the absence of adenovirus. In the presence of adenovirus, this vector produced increased amounts of CAT activity and the recombinant AAV-CAT genome was replicated. In 293 cells, pAVBcCAT expressed a similar amount of CAT activity in the absence or presence of adenovirus and the recombinant AAV-CAT genome was not replicated. In HeLa cells, pAVBcCAT expressed low levels of CAT activity, but this level was elevated by coinfection with adenovirus particles or by cotransfection with a plasmid which expressed the adenovirus early region 1A (E1A) product. The E1A product is a transcriptional activator and is expressed in 293 cells. Thus, expression from two AAV promoters is differentially regulated: expression from p19 is increased by E1A, whereas p40 yields high levels of constitutive expression in the absence of E1A. Both AAV vectors were packaged into AAV particles by complementation with wild-type AAV and yielded CAT activity when subsequently infected into cells in the presence of adenovirus.
 ...
PMID:A human parvovirus, adeno-associated virus, as a eucaryotic vector: transient expression and encapsidation of the procaryotic gene for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase. 609 38

During adeno-associated virus (AAV) type 2 productive infections, the p19 promoter of AAV is activated by the AAV Rep78 and Rep68 proteins. Rep-induced activation of p19 depends on the presence of one of several redundant Rep binding elements (RBEs) within the p5 promoter or within the terminal repeats (TR). In the absence of the TR, the p5 RBE and the p19 Sp1 site at position -50 are essential for p19 transactivation. To determine how a Rep complex bound at p5 induces transcription at p19, we made a series of p19 promoter chloramphenicol acetyltransferase constructs in which the p5 RBE was inserted at different locations upstream or downstream of the p19 mRNA start site. The RBE acted like a repressor element at most positions in the presence of both Rep and adenovirus (Ad), and the level of repression increased dramatically as the RBE was inserted closer to the p19 promoter. We concluded that the RBE by itself was not a conventional upstream activation signal and instead behaved like a repressor. To understand how the Rep-RBE complex within p5 activated p19, we considered the possibility that its role was to function as an architectural protein whose purpose was to bring other p5 transcriptional elements to the p19 promoter. In order to address this possibility, we replaced both the p5 RBE and the p19 Sp1 site with GAL4 binding sites. The modified GAL4-containing constructs were cotransfected with plasmids that expressed GAL4 fusion proteins capable of interacting through p53 and T-antigen (T-ag) protein domains. In the presence of Ad and the GAL4 fusion proteins, the p19 promoter exhibited strong transcriptional activation that was dependent on both the GAL4 fusion proteins and Ad infection. This suggested that the primary role of the p5 RBE and the p19 Sp1 sites was to act as a scaffold for bringing transcription complexes in the p5 promoter into close proximity with the p19 promoter. Since Rep and Sp1 themselves were not essential for transactivation, we tested mutants within the other p5 transcriptional elements in the context of GAL4-induced looping to determine which of the other p5 elements was necessary for p19 induction. Mutation of the p5 major late-transcription factor site reduced p19 activity but did not eliminate induction in the presence of the GAL4 fusion proteins. However, mutation of the p5 YY1 site at position -60 (YY1-60) eliminated GAL4-induced transactivation. This implicated the YY1-60 protein complexes in p19 induction by Rep. In addition, both basal p19 activity and activity in the presence of Ad increased when the YY1-60 site was mutated even in the absence of Rep or GAL4 fusion proteins. Therefore, there are likely to be alternative p5-p19 interactions that are Rep independent in which the YY1-60 complex inhibits p19 transcription. We concluded that transcriptional control of the p19 promoter was dependent on the formation of complexes between the p5 and p19 promoters and that activation of the p19 promoter depends largely on the ability of Rep and Sp1 to form a scaffold that positions the p5 YY1 complex near the p19 promoter.
 ...
PMID:Studies of the mechanism of transactivation of the adeno-associated virus p19 promoter by Rep protein. 1213 28

MBD2 is the only member of a family of methyl-CpG-binding proteins that has been reported to be both a transcriptional repressor and a DNA demethylase (dMTase). To understand the apparently contradictory function of MBD2/dMTase, we studied the effects of dMTase overexpression on the activity of various in vitro methylated promoters transiently transfected into HEK293 cells. We found that forced expression of a MBD2/dMTase expression vector (His-dMTase) differentially activated two methylated reporters, pSV40-CAT (the SV40 enhancerless promoter adjacent to the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter gene) and pGL2T+I4xTBRE (a region of the p21 promoter next to the luciferase reporter gene), in a time- and dose-dependent manner. His-dMTase increased pSV40-CAT expression by 3-10-fold after 96 h, while pGL2T+I4xTBRE expression was increased by 2-3-fold after only 48 h and did not further increase at 96 h. Gene activation was not universal because no effect was seen with the p19-ARF promoter. We then assessed whether activation might be due to demethylation within the promoter region. Using bisulfite mapping, we found that exogenous expression of His-dMTase induced demethylation at 8 of the 10 CpG sites within the SV40 promoter. The observation that His-dMTase increases the demethylase activity in the cells was also confirmed using an in vitro CpG demethylase assay with a mC32pG oligonucleotide substrate and purified Q-Sepharose fractions from HEK293 cells transfected with His-dMTase or empty pcDNA3.1His vector. We propose that a single protein possessing both repressor and demethylase functions has evolved to coordinate a program that requires suppression of some methylated genes and activation of others.
 ...
PMID:Promoter-specific activation and demethylation by MBD2/demethylase. 1217 48