Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:2.3.1.108 (TAT)
 2,389 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Many conventional anticancer treatments kill cells irrespective of whether they are normal or cancerous, so patients suffer from adverse side effects due to the loss of healthy cells. Anticancer insights derived from cell cycle research has given birth to the idea of cell cycle G2 checkpoint abrogation as a cancer cell specific therapy, based on the discovery that many cancer cells have a defective G1 checkpoint resulting in a dependence on the G2 checkpoint during cell replication. Damaged DNA in humans is detected by sensor proteins (such as hHUS1, hRAD1, hRAD9, hRAD17, and hRAD26) that transmit a signal via ATR to CHK1, or by another sensor complex (that may include gammaH2AX, 53BP1, BRCA1, NBS1, hMRE11, and hRAD50), the signal of which is relayed by ATM to CHK2. Most of the damage signals originated by the sensor complexes for the G2 checkpoint are conducted to CDC25C, the activity of which is modulated by 14-3-3. There are also less extensively explored pathways involving p53, p38, PCNA, HDAC, PP2A, PLK1, WEE1, CDC25B, and CDC25A. This review will examine the available inhibitors of CHK1 (Staurosporin, UCN-01, Go6976, SB-218078, ICP-1, and CEP-3891), both CHK1 and CHK2 (TAT-S216A and debromohymenialdisine), CHK2 (CEP-6367), WEE1 (PD0166285), and PP2A (okadaic acid and fostriecin), as well as the unknown checkpoint inhibitors 13-hydroxy-15-ozoapathin and the isogranulatimides. Among these targets, CHK1 seems to be the most suitable target for therapeutic G2 abrogation to date, although an unexplored target such as 14-3-3 or the strategy of targeting multiple proteins at once may be of interest in the future.
 ...
PMID:G2 checkpoint abrogators as anticancer drugs. 1507 95

Cell cycle G(2) checkpoint abrogation is an attractive strategy for sensitizing cancer cells to DNA-damaging anticancer agent without increasing adverse effects on normal cells. However, there is no single proven molecular target for this therapeutic approach. High-throughput screening for molecules inhibiting CHK1, a kinase that is essential for the G(2) checkpoint, has not yet yielded therapeutic G(2) checkpoint inhibitors, and the tumor suppressor phenotypes of ATM and CHK2 suggest they may not be ideal targets. Here, we optimized two G(2) checkpoint-abrogating peptides, TAT-S216 and TAT-S216A, based on their ability to reduce G(2) phase accumulation of DNA-damaged cells without affecting M phase accumulation of cells treated with a microtubule-disrupting compound. This approach yielded a peptide CBP501, which has a unique, focused activity against molecules that phosphorylate Ser(216) of CDC25C, including MAPKAP-K2, C-Tak1, and CHK1. CBP501 is >100-fold more potent than TAT-S216A and retains its selectivity for cancer cells. CBP501 is unusually stable, enters cells rapidly, and increases the cytotoxicity of DNA-damaging anticancer drugs against cancer cells without increasing adverse effects. These findings highlight the potency of CBP501 as a G(2)-abrogating drug candidate. This report also shows the usefulness of the cell cycle phenotype-based protocol for identifying G(2) checkpoint-abrogating compounds as well as the potential of peptide-based compounds as focused multitarget inhibitors.
 ...
PMID:Cell cycle phenotype-based optimization of G2-abrogating peptides yields CBP501 with a unique mechanism of action at the G2 checkpoint. 1723 75