Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:2.1.1.69 (BMT)
2,655 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

An important problem in the selection of unrelated donors for bone marrow transplantation (UD-BMT), is HLA matching, between selected donor and recipient. Serological screening, mixed lymphocyte culture (MLC), and sequence specific oligonucleotide genotyping (PCR-SSO) are the methods commonly used for typing of HLA-genes. These ways to select donor candidates are time-expensive. We set up new applications of the "fingerprinting-PCR" technique, to analyse the polymorphic second exon of DRB, DQB, DQA, DPB of HLA Class II and second exon A, B, C HLA-Class I genes, and to search for identity between patient and serologically selected unrelated donors. In an assessment of the technique, 50 normal samples, and 4 unrelated HLA-A and HLA-B serological matched patient-donor pairs were analysed for HLA polymorphic regions. In 3 of the 4 cases (UD-BMT) at least HLA-DRB mismatched different donor-transplanted patterns were identified. In all cases PCR-SSO analysis was performed as control. Based on our data, we suggest that identification of UD for allogeneic BMT should follow these steps: 1) serological HLA-Class I and II genes screening; 2) HLA-Class II DRB gene PCR fingerprinting; 3) confirmation by SSO analysis in case of fingerprinting identity. 4) HLA-Class II DQA, DQB, DPB PCR fingerprinting. Moreover, confirmation by PCR fingerprinting or protein isoelectrofocusing of HLA-Class I identity is recommended. This "strategy" may contribute to rapid and specific selection of unrelated marrow donors.
...
PMID:New strategies for selection of unrelated bone marrow donors. 844 42

Despite the use of partially T cell-depleted grafts, 20% of the recipients of an HLA-identical sibling marrow graft develop aGVHD > or = II. This indicates that the current method for selecting a sibling donor, ie serological typing for HLA-A, B and DR, and a mixed lymphocyte culture (MLC) or molecular typing for HLA-DRB/DQB, is not predictive for aGVHD. In order to optimise our selection procedure, we retrospectively analysed patients who developed aGVHD > or = II by means of sequencing based typing for HLA-DPB and frequency analysis of alloreactive helper and cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursors (HTLp-f and CTLp-f). Patients who did not develop aGVHD or developed aGVHD grade I served as controls. Retrospective typing for HLA-DPB revealed only a single disparity in the group with aGVHD > or = II, indicating that mismatches for antigens other than HLA are the major cause of aGVHD in these patients. Furthermore, in our patient group, neither HTLp-f nor CTLp-f were predictive for development of aGVHD indicating that these assays in their current set-up are insufficiently sensitive to predict aGVHD in BMT with a partially T cell-depleted graft. We conclude, that HLA-identical siblings can be identified by means of serological typing for HLA-A and B and intermediate resolution molecular typing for DRB and DQB, but that for the prediction of aGVHD cellular tests with higher sensitivity and specificity as compared to the currently used HTLp-f and CTLp-f assays need to be developed.
...
PMID:Helper and cytotoxic T cell precursor frequencies are not predictive for development of acute graft-versus-host disease after partially T cell-depleted HLA-identical sibling BMT. 987 66