Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: EC:2.1.1.67 (
thiopurine methyltransferase
)
551
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
Cancer
chemotherapy is characterized by a broad range of efficacy and toxicity among patients. Most anticancer drugs show wide interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics and have narrow therapeutic windows. Since drug metabolism is often an essential determinant of interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenomic studies of drug-metabolizing enzymes are expected to rationalize
cancer
chemotherapy in terms of patient, treatment, and dosage selection. Candidate gene approaches to pharmacogenomics are based on existing knowledge in clinical pharmacology, used to select the target(s) to be analyzed. So far, the candidate gene approach has provided important clues for pharmacogenomic-based personalized chemotherapy with 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP), solely metabolized by
thiopurine S-methyltransferase
(
TPMT
), and irinotecan, mainly detoxified by UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1). Reduced activity of
TPMT
caused by polymorphisms in the
TPMT
gene and decreased activity of UGT1A1 caused by UGT1A1*28 are related to severe toxic effects of 6-MP and irinotecan, respectively. In response to these findings, the Food and Drug Administration in the United States has supported clinical pharmacogenetic testing by revising the package inserts for these anticancer drugs. The genome wide approach to pharmacogenomics has gradually evolved with continued progress in genome sciences and technologies. This approach can disclose previously unknown relations of factors, as well as identify potential multigenetic associations. The genome wide approach can also identify genes underlying the phenotypic effects of anticancer drugs. This approach may play a complemental role to the candidate gene approach in the future of
cancer
pharmacogenomics. This review describes recent progress in pharmacogenomics in the field of
cancer
chemotherapy.
...
PMID:Pharmacogenomics in drug-metabolizing enzymes catalyzing anticancer drugs for personalized cancer chemotherapy. 1769 17
There is wide variability in the response of individuals to standard doses of drug therapy. This is an important problem in clinical practice, where it can lead to therapeutic failures or adverse drug events. Polymorphisms in genes coding for metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters can affect drug efficacy and toxicity. Pharmacogenomics aims to identify individuals predisposed to high risk of toxicity and low response from standard doses of anticancer drugs. This chapter focuses on the clinical significance of polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters in influencing efficacy and toxicity of anticancer therapy. The most important examples to demonstrate the influence of pharmacogenomics on anticancer therapy are
thiopurine methyltransferase
(
TPMT
), UGT (uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase) 1A1*28, and DPD (dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase) *2A, respectively, for 6-mercaptopurine, irinotecan, and 5-fluorouracil therapy. However, in most other anticancer therapies no clear association has been found for polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters and pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of anticancer drugs. Evaluation of different regimens and tumor types showed that polymorphisms can have different, sometimes even contradictory, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects in different tumors in response to different drugs. The clinical application of pharmacogenomics in
cancer
treatment therefore requires more detailed information regarding the different polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters. A greater understanding of complexities in pharmacogenomics is needed before individualized therapy can be applied on a routine basis.
...
PMID:Pharmacogenomics of drug-metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters in chemotherapy. 1837 Feb 31
The thiopurine drugs-azathioprine (AZA), 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP), and thioguanine-are widely used to treat
malignancies
, rheumatic diseases, dermatologic conditions, inflammatory bowel disease, and solid organ transplant rejection. However, thiopurine drugs have a relatively narrow therapeutic index and are capable of causing life-threatening toxicity, most often myelosuppression. Thiopurine S-methyltransferase (
TPMT
;
EC 2.1.1.67
), an enzyme that catalyzes S-methylation of these drugs, exhibits a genetic polymorphism in 10% of Caucasians, with 1/300 individuals having complete deficiency. Patients with intermediate or deficient
TPMT
activity are at risk for excessive toxicity after receiving standard doses of thiopurine medications. This report reviews the recent advances in the knowledge of the mechanism of action as well as the molecular basis and interethnic variations of
TPMT
and inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase (ITPase; EC 3.6.1.19), another enzyme implicated in thiopurine toxicity. In addition, an update on pharmacokinetics, metabolism, drug-drug interactions, safety, and tolerability of thiopurine drugs is provided.
...
PMID:Clinical pharmacology and pharmacogenetics of thiopurines. 1850 37
Sequencing the human genome brings new tools for the individualisation of
cancer
chemotherapy, especially thanks to the identification of polymorphisms of genes involved in anticancer drug metabolism or activity (pharmacogenetics). A few functional polymorphisms have been known for a long time (
thiopurine methyltransferase
, glutathion S-transferases), but several new ones have been identified recently, at the level of the genes encoding drug targets (thymidylate synthase), at the level of DNA repair enzymes (XPD) or at the level of transport proteins (MDR1). Clinical trials, first on a retrospective basis, then on a prospective one, are implemented to validate this approach.
Bull
Cancer
2008 Oct
PMID:[Biological bases for individualising prescriptions in oncology: the germline genome]. 1900 20
Azathioprine has been clinically used for decades in connection with organ transplantation, autoimmune disease, and treatment of
cancer
. Toxic side-reactions are common and have been linked to the liberation of excessively high concentrations of 6-mercaptopurine and corresponding toxic metabolites. An allelic variant of
thiopurine methyltransferase
with low activity is associated with elevated concentrations of 6-mercaptopurine. However, other genetic markers remain to be identified in order to fully account for adverse reactions and efficacy failure. In the present study, we studied the five known allelic variants of human glutathione transferase A2-2 (GST A2-2) (EC 2.5.1.18), abundantly expressed in liver and efficiently catalyzing the bioactivation of azathioprine to release 6-mercaptopurine. All five variants exhibited high activity with azathioprine, but allelic variant E of GST A2-2 displayed a 3-4-fold elevated catalytic efficiency compared to the other variants. High GST activity can lead to overproduction of 6-mercaptopurine, and the nature of the multiple forms of GSTs in a patient will obviously affect the metabolism of azathioprine. In addition to GST A2-2, the polymorphic GST M1-1 is also highly active with azathioprine. Considering our findings, it appears that the genotypic and phenotypic variations in the GST complement may influence the presentation of adverse reactions in patients treated with azathioprine. Clinical trials will be required to clarify the impact of the GST expression in comparison with the established biomarker
thiopurine methyltransferase
as predictors of adverse reactions.
...
PMID:Differences among allelic variants of human glutathione transferase A2-2 in the activation of azathioprine. 2043 37
Thiopurines have been used in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) for >30 years, and measurements of both
thiopurine methyltransferase
(
TPMT
) and thiopurine (TP) metabolites, 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN) and 6-methylmercaptopurine (6-MMP), have been readily available. The North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) Committee on Inflammatory Bowel Disease thought it appropriate to review the present indications for use of
TPMT
and TP metabolite testing. Substantial evidence demonstrates that TP therapy is useful for both Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis. Review of the existing data yielded the following recommendations.
TPMT
testing is recommended before initiation of TPs to identify individuals who are homozygote recessive or have extremely low
TPMT
activity, with the latter having more reliability than the former. Individuals who are homozygous recessive or have extremely low
TPMT
activity should avoid the use of TPs because of concerns for significant leukopenia. TMPT testing does not predict all cases of leukopenia and has no value to predict hypersensitivity adverse effects such as pancreatitis. Any potential value to reduce the risk of
malignancy
has not been studied. All individuals taking TPs should have routine monitoring with complete blood cell count and white blood cell count differential to evaluate for leukopenia regardless of
TPMT
testing results. Metabolite testing can be used to determine adherence with TP therapy. Metabolite testing can be used to guide dose increases or modifications in patients with active disease. Consideration would include either increasing the dose, changing therapy or for those with elevated transaminases or an elevated 6-MMP, using adjunctive allopurinol to help raise 6-thioguanine metabolites and suppress formation of 6-MMP. Routine and repetitive metabolite testing has little or no role in patients who are doing well and taking an acceptable dose of a TP.
...
PMID:Role of thiopurine metabolite testing and thiopurine methyltransferase determination in pediatric IBD. 2328 4
Ototoxicity is a debilitating side effect of platinating agents with substantial interpatient variability. We sought to evaluate the association of
thiopurine S-methyltransferase
(
TPMT
) and catechol O-methyltransferase (COMT) genetic variations with cisplatin-related hearing damage in the context of frontline pediatric cancer treatment protocols. In 213 children from the St. Jude Medulloblastoma-96 and -03 protocols, hearing loss was related to younger age (P = 0.013) and craniospinal irradiation (P = 0.001), but did not differ by
TPMT
or COMT variants. Results were similar in an independent cohort of 41 children from solid-tumor frontline protocols. Functional hearing loss or hair cell damage was not different in
TPMT
knockout vs. wild-type mice following cisplatin treatment, and neither
TPMT
nor COMT variant was associated with cisplatin cytotoxicity in lymphoblastoid cell lines. In conclusion, our results indicated that
TPMT
or COMT genetic variation was not related to cisplatin ototoxicity in children with
cancer
and did not influence cisplatin-induced hearing damage in laboratory models.
...
PMID:The role of inherited TPMT and COMT genetic variation in cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in children with cancer. 2464 35
In light of the increasing need by decision makers for a method of evaluating genomic applications based on the weight of evidence for their efficacy, several agencies have developed systems of classification. Here I review the horizon-scanning method for prioritizing genomics applications as described by Dotson et al. in this issue of CPT. Using the examples of the authors' Tier 1/Green classification for KRAS and Tier 2/Yellow for
TPMT
, I discuss differences between the guidelines issued by the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) and those by the National Comprehensive
Cancer
Network (NCCN). Additionally, I offer suggestions regarding classification of the Tier 3/Red genomics applications and the reproducibility of the data-curating algorithm of the horizon-scanning method.
...
PMID:A horizon-prioritizing method can identify gaps among genomic application guidelines. 2439 97
Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome is a complication of therapy for pediatric ALL and may be modified by
thiopurine methyltransferase
activity as well as by MTHFR genotype. We assessed
TPMT
*3A, *3B, *3C, and MTHFR C677T and A1298C germline genetic polymorphisms among 351 patients enrolled in the thioguanine treatment arm of CCG-1952 clinical trial.
TPMT
and MTHFR C677T genotypes were not associated with SOS risk. The combination of MTHFR and
TPMT
variant genotypes was not associated with SOS risk. These suggest that germline genetic variation in
TPMT
and MTHFR do not significantly alter SOS risk in patients exposed to thioguanine.
Pediatr Blood
Cancer
2014 Nov
PMID:TPMT and MTHFR genotype is not associated with altered risk of thioguanine-related sinusoidal obstruction syndrome in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. 2473 78
Treatment with cisplatin-containing chemotherapy regimens causes hearing loss in 40-60% of
cancer
patients. It has been suggested that genetic variants in the genes encoding
thiopurine S-methyltransferase
(
TPMT
) and catechol O-methyltransferase (COMT) can predict the development of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity and may explain interindividual variability in sensitivity to cisplatin-induced hearing loss. Two recently published studies however, sought to validate these findings and showed inconsistent results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of polymorphisms in the
TPMT
and COMT genes in cisplatin-induced ototoxicity. Therefore we investigated two independent cohorts of 110 Dutch and 38 Spanish patients with osteosarcoma and performed a meta-analysis including all previously published studies resulting in a total population of 664 patients with
cancer
. With this largest meta-analysis performed to date, we show that the influence of
TPMT
and COMT on the development of cisplatin-induced hearing loss may be less important than previously suggested.
...
PMID:Influence of genetic variants in TPMT and COMT associated with cisplatin induced hearing loss in patients with cancer: two new cohorts and a meta-analysis reveal significant heterogeneity between cohorts. 2555 97
<< Previous
1
2
3
4
5
6
Next >>