Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:1.6.5.2 (NQO1)
 6,196 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The purpose of this study was to characterize the human cutaneous NAD(P)H: quinone reductase (NQR) activity by known inhibitors of different reductases and to compare it with the murine skin and liver NQR activity. This enzyme plays a major role in the defence of cells against oxygen stress because it inhibits the 1-electron reduction of quinones to semiquinones and their subsequent oxidation to quinones termed as quinone redox cycle. It belongs to the aromatic hydrocarbon-responsive (Ah) battery. This gene battery includes Cyp1a1 (cytochrome P-450 IA1), Cyp1a2 (cytochrome P-450 IA2) and Nmo-1 [NAD(P)H: quinone reductase]. In the skin cytochrome P-450 IA1-dependent activity is about 1-5% compared to the corresponding activity in the liver, whereas NQR has the same activity in skin and liver. NQR was determined in the cytoplasm of murine skin, liver, and human keratinocytes using 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol as the substrate. The Ah-receptor binding compounds, such as coal tar constituents, or 3-methylcholanthrene induce cytochrome P-450-dependent activities such as aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase or 7-ethoxyresorufin-O-de-ethylase and NQR, whereas butyl hydroxytoluol, which does not bind to the Ah receptor, induces only NQR. For inhibition studies several known inhibitors of dihydrodiol dehydrogenase, aldo-keto and carbonyl reductase activities were used. There was a similar pattern of inhibition of the basal and induced activity in all tissues investigated. Pyrazole, progesterone and phenobarbital did not inhibit, whereas dicoumarol, rutin and indomethacin inhibited NQR activity in murine skin and liver as well as in human keratinocytes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Induction and inhibition of NAD(P)H: quinone reductase in murine and human skin. 176 30

Dimethyl fumarate and dimethyl maleate are potent inducers of cytosolic NAD(P)H:(quinone acceptor) oxidoreductase (here designated quinone reductase) activity in Hepa 1c1c7 murine hepatoma cells in culture, whereas fumaric and maleic acids are much less potent, in agreement with the much greater reactivity of the esters as Michael reaction acceptors (P. Talalay, M. J. De Long, and H. J. Prochaska, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 85:8261-8265, 1988). Dimethyl fumarate also induced quinone reductase in mutants of the Hepa 1c1c7 cell line that were either defective in the Ah receptor or in cytochrome P1-450 activity, thereby establishing that this compound is a monofunctional inducer (H. J. Prochaska and P. Talalay, Cancer Res., 48: 4776-4782, 1988). Addition of dimethyl fumarate to the diet of female CD-1 mice and female Sprague-Dawley rats at 0.2-0.5% concentrations elevated cytosolic glutathione transferases and quinone reductase activities in a variety of organs, whereas much higher concentrations of fumaric acid were only marginally active. The widespread induction of such detoxication enzymes by dimethyl fumarate suggests the potential value of this compound as a protective agent against chemical carcinogenesis and other forms of electrophile toxicity. This proposal is supported by the finding that the concentrations of dimethyl fumarate required to obtain substantial enzyme inductions were well tolerated by rodents. Furthermore, the parent fumaric acid has low chronic toxicity and is a naturally occurring metabolic intermediate that is already in the food chain as an additive, and fumarate salts and esters are used for therapeutic purposes in man.
 ...
PMID:Induction of glutathione transferases and NAD(P)H:quinone reductase by fumaric acid derivatives in rodent cells and tissues. 212 43

Most chemical carcinogens require activation to reactive electrophilic forms by Phase 1 enzymes (cytochromes P-450) in order to exert their toxic and neoplastic effects. The resultant electrophiles are susceptible to metabolic conjugation and other types of detoxications by Phase 2 enzymes (glutathione transferases, NAD(P)H: quinone reductase, glucuronosyltransferases). The balance between Phase 1 and Phase 2 enzymes is an important determinant of whether exposure to carcinogens will result in toxicity and neoplasia. Measurements of the activity of quinone reductase (QR) provide an efficient method for studying the potency and mechanism of Phase 2 enzyme induction. QR can be measured easily in murine hepatoma cells (Hepa lclc7) grown in microtiter plate wells, and the inductive response of these cells closely parallels the behavior of rodent tissues in vivo. Some inducers (such as large planar aromatics) are bifunctional; they induce both Phase 1 and Phase 2 enzymes and require binding to the Ah receptor and enhanced transcription of the cytochrome P1-450 system. Other inducers (e.g., phenolic antioxidants, 1, 2-dithiole-3-thiones, coumarins, thiocarbamates) are monofunctional and are independent of Ah receptor function. Monofunctional enzyme induction protects against carcinogens. The induction of Phase 2 enzymes by monofunctional inducers depends on the presence, or acquisition by metabolism, of electrophilic centers, and many of these inducers are Michael reaction acceptors. Our search for chemoprotective enzyme inducers for potential use as chemoprotectors in man is currently focused on fumarate derivatives, as well as on the identification of other monofunctional inducers in extracts of vegetables.
 ...
PMID:Regulation of enzymes that detoxify the electrophilic forms of chemical carcinogens. 213 77

A persuasive body of evidence indicates that substantial protection against chemical carcinogenesis can be achieved by induction of enzymes concerned with the metabolism of carcinogens. There are two classes of anticarcinogenic enzyme inducers: (a) monofunctional inducers (e.g., phenolic antioxidants, isothiocyanates, coumarins, thiocarbamates, cinnamates, 1,2-dithiol-3-thiones) that elevate Phase II enzymes (such as glutathione S-transferases, NAD(P)H:quinone reductase, UDP-glucuronosyl-transferases) in various tissues without significantly raising the Phase I enzyme, aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase (cytochrome P1-450); and (b) bifunctional inducers (e.g., polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, flavonoids, and azo dyes) that induce both Phase I and Phase II enzymes of xenobiotic metabolism. Induction of Phase II enzymes appears to be a sufficient condition for achieving chemoprotection, and since certain Phase I enzymes are responsible for activating carcinogens to their ultimate reactive forms, selective Phase II enzyme inducers offer intrinsically safer prospects for achieving chemoprotection. Whereas induction of both Phase I and II enzymes by bifunctional inducers depends on the Ah receptor, induction of Phase II enzymes by monofunctional inducers is independent of a functional Ah receptor. Studies on the structural requirements for induction of quinone reductase [NAD(P)H:(quinone acceptor) oxidoreductase; EC 1.6.99.2] by monofunctional inducers in Hepa 1c1c7 murine hepatoma cells have revealed that such inducers contain a distinctive chemical feature (or acquire this feature by metabolism) that regulates the synthesis of this protective enzyme. The inducers are all Michael reaction acceptors characterized by olefinic (or acetylenic) linkages that are rendered electrophilic by conjugation with electron-withdrawing groups. Typical examples are alpha, beta-unsaturated aldehydes, ketones (including quinones), thioketones, sulfones, esters, nitriles and nitro groups. The potency of these inducers parallels their reactivity as Michael acceptors. These generalizations have provided mechanistic insight into the vexing question of how so many seemingly unrelated anticarcinogens induce chemoprotective enzymes. They have also led to the prediction of entirely new and unsuspected structures of inducers, with potential for chemoprotective activity.
 ...
PMID:Mechanisms of induction of enzymes that protect against chemical carcinogenesis. 269 44

Thyroidectomy of rats confers some protection, by an unknown mechanism, from the weight loss, immunotoxicity, and mortality induced by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). Since at least some of the many effects of TCDD appear to be mediated by the Ah receptor, perhaps the thyroid plays a role in regulation of this receptor, thereby modifying the toxicity of TCDD. We tested this hypothesis by comparing TCDD-binding characteristics of the receptor and hepatic enzyme inducibility by TCDD (a receptor-mediated response) in thyroidectomized (ThX) and euthyroid rats. There were no significant differences in levels of TCDD binding in vitro in hepatic cytosol, in receptor affinity, nor in the molecular size of the TCDD-bound receptor in untreated ThX rats compared to controls fed ad libitum or pair-fed. Total hepatic cytochrome P-450 (P-450) levels and NADPH-menadione oxidoreductase (NMOR) activity were unaffected by thyroid status, whereas 7-ethoxycoumarin O-deethylase (ECOD) activity was approx. 50% lower in ThX animals than in ad libitum or pair-fed controls. At 3 and 10 days after TCDD administration (10 micrograms/kg, i.p.), P-450 concentrations and NMOR and ECOD activities were induced by approximately the same proportions in ThX and pair-fed intact rats; however, the absolute levels of the induced activities were lower in ThX than in pair-fed controls. It was concluded that hypothyroidism does not regulate Ah receptor concentration or function in the liver. Therefore, the modulation of TCDD toxicity by hypothyroidism appears not to involve changes in the hepatic Ah receptor.
 ...
PMID:Effects of thyroidectomy on the Ah receptor and enzyme inducibility by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in the rat liver. 301 82

Anticarcinogenic enzyme inducers are of two types: (a) bifunctional inducers [2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, polycyclic aromatics, azo dyes, beta-naphthoflavone] that elevate both Phase II enzymes [e.g., glutathione S-transferases, UDP-glucuronosyltransferases, and NAD(P)H:(quinone-acceptor) oxidoreductase] and certain Phase I enzymes [e.g., aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase (AHH)]; and (b) monofunctional inducers [e.g., diphenols, thiocarbamates, 1,2-dithiol-3-thiones, isothiocyanates] that elevate primarily Phase II enzymes without significantly affecting AHH. Since Phase I enzymes such as AHH may activate precarcinogens to ultimate carcinogens whereas Phase II enzyme induction suffices to achieve chemoprotection, an understanding of the molecular mechanisms that regulate these enzymes is critical for devising methods for chemoprotection. We report a systematic analysis of the inductions of aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase (AHH) and NAD(P)H:quinone reductase (QR) by seven monofunctional and eight bifunctional inducers, singly or in combination, in a murine hepatoma cell line (Hepa 1c1c7) and two mutants defective in either Ah (Aryl hydrocarbon) receptor function (BPrc1) or in AHH expression (c1). We have also examined such inductions in genetically defined mouse strains with high affinity (C57BL/6J) and low affinity (DBA/2J) Ah receptors. The combination of our earlier model for the induction of Phase I and Phase II enzymes (H. J. Prochaska, M. J. De Long, and P. Talalay, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 82: 8232, 1985) with mechanism(s) for autoregulation of AHH (O. Hankinson, R. D. Anderson, B. W. Birren, F. Sander, M. Negishi, and D. W. Nebert, J. Biol. Chem., 260: 1790, 1985) is compatible with our results. Thus, induction of QR by monofunctional inducers does not depend on a competent Ah receptor or AHH activity and appears to involve an electrophilic chemical signal. In contrast, bifunctional inducers require competent Ah receptors to induce both AHH and QR, although the latter process appears to be regulated by more than one mechanism. It is our view that bifunctional inducers bind to the Ah receptor thereby enhancing transcription of genes encoding both AHH and QR. Metabolizable bifunctional inducers are then converted by the induced AHH to products that resemble monofunctional inducers and are capable of generating the aforementioned chemical signal. The existence of mechanism(s) for AHH autoregulation that also affect Phase II enzyme expression would account for the high basal activities of QR in the AHH-defective mutant (c1).
 ...
PMID:Regulatory mechanisms of monofunctional and bifunctional anticarcinogenic enzyme inducers in murine liver. 340 19

NAD(P)H:menadione oxidoreductase induction by polycyclic hydrocarbons is known to be governed by the aromatic hydrocarbon-responsive (Ah) locus. This cytosolic enzyme was isolated from 3-methylcholanthrene-treated rat liver by a rapid two-step procedure with the use of affinity gel purification and fast-protein liquid chromatography. Polyclonal antiserum to menadione reductase was raised in rabbits. On Western (immuno) blot analysis, large increases in this hepatic menadione reductase protein (NMOR1) of 3-methylcholanthrene-treated C57BL/6N but not DBA/2N mice confirmed that induction of this enzyme by 3-methyl-cholanthrene is regulated by the Ah receptor. A cDNA expression library was constructed in lambda gt11 and screened with antiserum. Positive cDNA clones were plaque purified and further characterized by showing enhanced hybridization to 3-methylcholanthrene-induced poly(A+) RNA from rats; the longest cDNA clone (1,501 base pairs) has an open reading frame (bases 75-899) and a nucleotide sequence consistent with a new gene family. On Northern blot analysis, a single 3-methylcholanthrene-inducible rat liver mRNA (approximately 1.6 kilobases) hybridizes to the cDNA probe. On Southern blot analysis a total of 14-16 kilobases of rat genomic DNA fragments hybridize to the cDNA probe, indicating one or a small number of menadione reductase genes in this family. The amino acid sequence (274 residues) and Mr of 30,946 compare well with the size of the rat enzyme (32 kDa) estimated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The amino acid sequence of two internal fragments of the trypsin-digested purified NMOR1 protein is in complete agreement with that deduced from the cDNA nucleotide sequence. This study represents the first cloning and sequencing of a cDNA encoding a Phase II drug-metabolizing enzyme under control of the Ah locus.
 ...
PMID:NAD(P)H:menadione oxidoreductase. Novel purification of enzyme cDNA and complete amino acid sequence, and gene regulation. 353 15

A number of genes under the control of the arylhydrocarbon (Ah) receptor were tested for the effects of glucocorticoids on their expression in cultured primary rat hepatocytes. Treatment of cultured hepatocytes with 1.0 microM dexamethasone potentiated the induction (2- to 3-fold) of cytochrome P4501A1, glutathione S-transferase Ya subunit (GSTYa), and UDP-glucuronosyltransferase gene expression by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), whereas the glucocorticoid agonist suppressed PAH induction of NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase (QOR) subunit and aldehyde dehydrogenase 3C gene expression by 60-80%. These results were seen at the level of enzyme activity for induction by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and at the level of enzyme activity, protein, and specific mRNA for induction by 1,2-benzanthracene. Two of these rat genes, GSTYa and QOR are also induced by electrophilic agents, such as t-butylhydroquinone. In the presence of t-butylhydroquinone, dexamethasone caused a similar level of potentiation of GSTYa subunit expression and suppression of QOR subunit expression as was seen with the PAH, 1,2-benzanthracene. Studies using the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist, RU38486, demonstrated that the modulation of PAH induction by glucocorticoids of cytochrome P4501A1 and QOR activity is apparently dependent on action of the glucocorticoid receptor. These results suggest that the positive and negative changes observed are the result of specific alterations in the rates of transcription of these genes because of the action of the glucocorticoid receptor, thereby affecting regulation of GSTYa and QOR by both Ah receptor-dependent and independent mechanisms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Regulation of the Ah gene battery via Ah receptor-dependent and independent processes in cultured adult rat hepatocytes. 758 46

We have cloned and sequenced the mouse NMO1 cDNA, which encodes the NAD(P)H:menadione oxidoreductase [also called NAD(P)H:(quinone acceptor) oxidoreductase; quinone reductase; azo dye reductase; DT diaphorase; EC 1.6.99.2]. The cDNA is 1528 bp in length excluding the poly(A+) tail, and has 5' and 3' nontranslated regions of 108 bp and 595 bp, respectively. The deduced protein contains 274 amino acids, including the first methionine (M(r) = 30,959). The mouse NMO1 protein is: 94% similar to the rat NMO1 and 86.5% to the human NMO1 proteins; 49.3% identical to the human NQO2 protein; and < 20% similar to several dozen other proteins in the quinone oxidoreductase superfamily. Southern hybridization analysis of mouse DNA reveals that the Nmo1 gene is likely to span less than a total of 20 kb. The Nmo1 gene is highly inducible by 2,3,7,8,-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (dioxin; TCDD) in mouse liver and mouse cell cultures. TCDD inducibility of NMO1 is detectable at 12 and 18 days of gestation, but markedly elevated at 1-3 weeks post partum as compared with the 6- and 12-week-old mouse. NMO1 mRNA levels are strikingly elevated in the untreated mouse hepatoma Hepa-1c1c7 mutant line c37 lacking CYP1A1 (aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase) activity, and in the untreated 14CoS/14CoS mouse cell line having an 'oxidative stress response' caused by homozygous deletion of about 3800 kb on chromosome 7. Previous work and the data in this report show that the murine Nmo1 gene is regulated by three distinct mechanisms: CYP1A1 metabolism-dependent repression, Ah receptor-mediated induction by TCDD, and activation by the chromosome 7-mediated oxidative stress response.
 ...
PMID:Mouse dioxin-inducible NAD(P)H: menadione oxidoreductase: NMO1 cDNA sequence and genetic differences in mRNA levels. 770 40

The class-3 aldehyde dehydrogenase that is overexpressed (> 100-fold) in human breast adenocarcinoma MCF-7/0 cells made resistant (> 30-fold as judged by LC90s) to oxazaphosphorines, such as mafosfamide, by growing them in the presence of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, e.g., methylcholanthrene (3 microM for 5 days), was isolated and characterized. Its physical and catalytic properties were identical to those of the prototypical human stomach mucosa cytosolic class-3 aldehyde dehydrogenase, type-1 ALDH-3, except that it catalyzed, though not very rapidly, the oxidation of aldophosphamide, whereas the stomach mucosa enzyme essentially did not; hence, it was judged to be a slight variant of the prototypical enzyme. Carcinogens that are not ligands for the Ah receptor, barbiturates known to induce hepatic cytochrome P450s, steroid hormones, an antiestrogen, and oxazaphosphorines did not induce the enzyme or the largely oxazaphosphorine-specific acquired resistance. Whereas methylcholanthrene induced (a) resistance to mafosfamide and (b) class-3 aldehyde dehydrogenase activity, as well as glutathione S-transferase and DT-diaphorase activities, in the estrogen receptor-positive MCF-7/0 cells, it did not do so in two other human breast adenocarcinoma cell lines, MDA-MB-231 and SK-BR-3, each of which is estrogen receptor negative. Expression of the class-3 aldehyde dehydrogenase and the loss of sensitivity to mafosfamide by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-treated MCF-7/0 cells were transient; each returned to essentially basal levels within 15 days when the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon was removed from the culture medium. Insensitivity to the oxazaphosphorines on the part of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-treated MCF-7/0 cells was not observed when exposure to mafosfamide (30 min) was in the presence of benzaldehyde or octanal, each a relatively good substrate for cytosolic class-3 aldehyde dehydrogenases, whereas it was retained when exposure to mafosfamide was in the presence of acetaldehyde, a relatively poor substrate for these enzymes. These observations demonstrate that ligands for the Ah receptor can induce a transient, largely oxazaphosphorine-specific, acquired cellular resistance, and they are consistent with the notion that elevated levels of a cytosolic class-3 aldehyde dehydrogenase nearly identical to the prototypical type-1 class-3 aldehyde dehydrogenase expressed by human stomach mucosa account for the Ah receptor ligand-induced oxazaphosphorine-specific acquired resistance, most probably by catalyzing the detoxification of aldophosphamide.
 ...
PMID:Identification of a methylcholanthrene-induced aldehyde dehydrogenase in a human breast adenocarcinoma cell line exhibiting oxazaphosphorine-specific acquired resistance. 817 25


1 2 3 4 5 6 Next >>