Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:1.5.1.3 (dihydrofolate reductase)
 5,819 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Activity of the dihydrofolate reductase (dhfr) promoter increases at the G1-S-phase boundary of the cell cycle. Mutations that abolish protein binding to an E2F element in the dhfr promoter also abolish the G1-S-phase increase in dhfr transcription, indicating that transcriptional regulation is mediated by the E2F family of proteins. To investigate the mechanism by which E2F regulates dhfr transcription, we moved the E2F element upstream and downstream of its natural position in the promoter. We found that the E2F element confers growth regulation to the dhfr promoter only when it is proximal to the transcription start site. Using a heterologous E2F element, we showed that position-dependent regulation is a property that is promoter specific, not E2F element specific. We demonstrated that E2F-mediated growth regulation of dhfr transcription requires activation of the dhfr promoter in S phase and that the C-terminal activation domains of E2F1, E2F4, and E2F5, when fused to the Gal4 DNA binding domain, are sufficient to specify position-dependent activation. To further investigate the role of activation in dhfr regulation, we tested other transactivation domains for their ability to activate the dhfr promoter. We found that the N-terminal transactivation domain of VP16 cannot activate the dhfr promoter. We propose that, unlike other E2F-regulated promoters, robust transcription from the dhfr promoter requires an E2F transactivation domain close to the transcription start site.
 ...
PMID:Position-dependent transcriptional regulation of the murine dihydrofolate reductase promoter by the E2F transactivation domain. 912 44

Regulation of gene expression in mammals through methylation of cytosine residues at CpG dinucleotides is involved in the development and progression of tumors. Because many genes that are involved in the control of cell proliferation are regulated by members of the E2F family of transcription factors and because some E2F DNA-binding sites are methylated in vivo, we have investigated whether CpG methylation can regulate E2F functions. We show here that methylation of E2F elements derived from the dihydrofolate reductase, E2F1, and cdc2 promoters prevents the binding of all E2F family members tested (E2F1 through E2F5). In contrast, methylation of the E2F elements derived from the c-myc and c-myb promoters minimally affects the binding of E2F2, E2F3, E2F4, and E2F5 but significantly inhibits the binding of E2F1. Consistent with these studies, E2F3, but not E2F1, activates transcription through methylated E2F sites derived from the c-myb and c-myc genes whereas both E2F1 and E2F3 fail to transactivate a reporter gene that is under the control of a methylated dihydrofolate reductase E2F site. Together, these data illustrate a means through which E2F activity can be controlled.
 ...
PMID:CpG methylation as a mechanism for the regulation of E2F activity. 1082 96

High-risk types of HPV express the oncoproteins, E6 and E7, that can inactivate TP53 and RB1, respectively, and thus take control of both cell cycle and apoptosis. Herein, the mRNA expression profiles of 24 G1/S checkpoint genes were analysed in cancer and squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) of the uterine cervix. In total 35 squamous cervical carcinomas, 26 high-grade SIL (HSIL), 33 low-grade SIL (LSIL) tissues, and 28 normal uterine cervix specimens as controls were assessed by RT-PCR. Five genes were found to be upregulated only in tumours, RBL2, E2F2, CDK6, CCNE1 and MYC; eight in tumours and HSILs, E2F1, E2F3, E2F5, CCND1, CDK2, CDKN1B, PCNA and POLA, and five in tumours, HSILs and LSILs, TP53, E2F4, CDKN1A, CDKN2A and DHFR. MDM2 was found to be upregulated in SIL, while RBL1 was found to be downregulated in all three groups of cases. TP73 exhibited lower levels in carcinomas; however, its exon 13-containing isoforms were increased and exon 2-containing isoforms were reduced in both cancer and HSIL. Three genes, RB1, CDK4 and CDKN2D, did not exhibit any significant alteration in gene expression. Hierarchical clustering revealed that this set of G1/S checkpoint genes was able to discriminate the total 122 samples into groups of disease and non-disease with only 8 exceptions (6.6%). Our data suggest that deregulation of G1/S phase transition in cervical carcinogenesis is a progressive process. Certain clusters of genes are activated very early in pre-cancerous SILs while others are activated later, during malignant transformation. The ability of this array of markers to identify disease status suggests that it could be used for diagnostic purposes.
 ...
PMID:Deregulation of the G1/S phase transition in cancer and squamous intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix: a case control study. 1881 14