Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:1.16.3.1 (ceruloplasmin)
 5,074 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Despite a recent surge of reports about how microRNAs might regulate translation, the question has not been answered. The proposed mechanisms contradict one another, and none is supported by strong evidence. This review explains some deficiencies in the experiments with microRNAs. Some of the problems are traceable to bad habits carried over from older studies of translational regulation, here illustrated by discussing two models involving mRNA binding proteins. One widely-accepted model, called into doubt by recent findings, is the maskin hypothesis for translational repression of cyclin B1 in Xenopus oocytes. The second dubious model postulates repression of translation of ceruloplasmin by mRNA binding proteins. A big fault in the latter case is reconstructing the imagined mechanism before looking carefully at the real thing--a criticism that applies also to studies with microRNAs. Experiments with microRNAs often employ internal ribosome entry sequences (IRESs) as tools, necessitating brief discussion of that topic. A sensitive new assay reveals that many putative IRESs promote expression of downstream cistrons via splicing rather than internal initiation of translation. Recent claims about the biological importance of IRES-binding proteins--including suggestions that these proteins might serve as targets for cancer therapy--are not supported by any meaningful evidence. The bottom line is that older studies of mRNA binding proteins and putative IRESs have created a confusing picture of translational regulation which is not helpful when trying to understand how microRNAs might work. The obvious biological importance of microRNAs makes it essential to understand how they do what they do. Fresh ways of thinking and looking are needed.
 ...
PMID:Faulty old ideas about translational regulation paved the way for current confusion about how microRNAs function. 1869 53

To identify differentially regulated molecules related to early and late stages of tumor promotion in a rat two-stage thyroid carcinogenesis model by an antithyroid agent, sulfadimethoxine, microarray-based microdissected lesion-specific gene expression profiling was carried out. Proliferative lesions for profiling were divided into two categories: (i) focal follicular cell hyperplasias (FFCH) and adenomas (Ad) as early lesions; and (ii) carcinomas (Ca) as more advanced. In both cases, gene expression was compared with that in surrounding non-tumor follicular cells. Characteristically, upregulation of cell cycle-related genes in FFCH + Ad, downregulation of genes related to tumor suppression and transcription inhibitors of inhibitor of DNA binding (Id) family proteins in Ca, and upregulation of genes related to cell proliferation and tumor progression in common in FFCH + Ad and Ca, were detected. The immunohistochemical distributions of molecules included in the altered expression profiles were further examined. In parallel with microarray data, increased localization of ceruloplasmin, cyclin B1, and cell division cycle 2 homolog A, and decreased localization of poliovirus receptor-related 3 and Id3 were observed in all types of lesion. Although inconsistent with the microarray data, thyroglobulin immunoreactivity appeared to reduce in Ca. The results thus suggest cell cycling facilitation by induction of M-phase-promoting factor consisting of cyclin B1 and cell division cycle 2 homolog A and generation of oxidative responses as evidenced by ceruloplasmin accumulation from an early stage, as well as suppression of cell adhesion involving poliovirus receptor-related 3 and inhibition of cellular differentiation regulated by Id3. Decrease of thyroglobulin in Ca may reflect dedifferentiation with progression.
 ...
PMID:Cellular distributions of molecules with altered expression specific to thyroid proliferative lesions developing in a rat thyroid carcinogenesis model. 1929 5