Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:1.1.1.41 (isocitrate dehydrogenase)
 3,101 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Unlike the case with acute myeloid leukemia, there is limited information on the prognostic impact of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). In the current study of 277 patients with MDS, IDH mutations were detected in 34 (12%) cases: 26 IDH2 (all R140Q) and 8 IDH1 (6 R132S and 2 R132C). Mutational frequency was 4% (2 of 56) in refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts, 12% (16 of 130) in refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia, 14% (2 of 14) in MDS-unclassifiable, 14% (6 of 42) in refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB)-1 and 23% (8 of 35) in RAEB-2. Normal karyotype was noted in all but one IDH1-mutated cases and 13 IDH2-mutated cases. Multivariable analysis identified presence of mutant IDH1 (P=0.0004; hazard ration 4.0, 95% confidence interval 1.9-8.8), revised International Prognostic Scoring System risk category (P<0.0001), and red cell transfusion need (P=0.002) as independent predictors of inferior survival. In a similar multivariable analysis, mutant IDH1 was the only variable associated with shortened leukemia-free survival (P=0.001; hazard ration 7.0, 95% confidence interval 2.3-20.8). The presence of IDH2R140Q did not affect the overall (P=0.54) or leukemia-free (P=0.81) survival. The current study suggests a powerful adverse prognostic effect for mutant IDH1 in MDS.
 ...
PMID:Differential prognostic effect of IDH1 versus IDH2 mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes: a Mayo Clinic study of 277 patients. 2203 90

Previous studies on the pathogenesis of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) have identified multiple associated gene mutations, including mutations of tetmethylcytosinedioxygenase 2, isocitrate dehydrogenase [NADP(+)] 1 cytosolic, isocitrate dehydrogenase [NADP(+)] 2 mitochondrial and additional sex combs like 1 transcriptional regulator, all of which may be considered epigenetic regulators. Furthermore, mutations of RAS type GTPase family genes have been identified in 10-15% patients with MDS. The authors' previous study on the gene expression profile of cluster of differentiation 34+ cells using microarray analysis identified elevated expression of RAP1GTPase activating protein 1 (Rap1GAP) in patients with MDS compared with that in non-malignant blood diseases (NM) control group. To further investigate the mechanism of increased Rap1GAP expression, the methylation pattern of the promoter of this gene was determined in 86 patients with MDS (n=29), acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (n=31) or NM (n=26) using bisulfite-specific polymerase chain reaction and DNA sequencing. The results demonstrated that the methylation of Rap1GAP occurred in all 29 patients with MDS at multiple CpG sites. The methylation level of Rap1GAP in patients with MDS was decreased compared with that in patients with NM. Significant differences at 4CpG sites (5,7,8 and 12) of Rap1GAP promoter were identified between MDS and NM. Furthermore, based on the present clinical records of the patient cohort, the methylation status of Rap1GAP promoter did not appear to be associated with the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with MDS, including age, gender and International Prognosis Score System. The difference in methylation level at CpG site 8 of Rap1GAP promoter was identified to be significantly increased in patients with MDS-refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts compared with that in the MDS-refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia or MDS-unclassified groups. The results of the present study suggest that patients with MDS exhibit a lower overall methylation level within Rap1GAP promoter compared with patients with NM or AML. In addition, the methylation level at the four identified CpG sites can distinguish between MDS and NM.
 ...
PMID:Methylation level of Rap1GAP and the clinical significance in MDS. 3054 68